Cited by 151Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural dynamics and brain function

Posttraining Sleep Enhances Automaticity in Perceptual Discrimination

Open access
Atienza, Mercedes, Cantero, Jose L., Stickgold, Robert·2004·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Perceptual learning can develop over extended periods, with slow, at times sleep-dependent, improvement seen several days after training. As a result, performance can become more automatic, that is, less dependent on voluntary attention. This study investigates whether the brain correlates of this enhancement of automaticity are sleep-dependent. Event-related potentials produced in response to complex auditory stimuli were recorded while subjects' attention was focused elsewhere. We report here that following training on an auditory discrimination task, performance continued to improve, without significant further training, for 72 hr. At the same time, several event-related potential components became evident 48–72 hr after training. Posttraining sleep deprivation prevented neither the continued performance improvement nor the slow development of cortical dynamics related to an enhanced familiarity with the task. However, those brain responses associated with the automatic shift of attention to unexpected stimuli failed to develop. Thus, in this auditory learning paradigm, posttraining sleep appears to reduce the voluntary attentional effort required for successful perceptual discrimination by facilitating the intrusion of a potentially meaningful stimulus into one's focus of attention for further evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892904322755557

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep after training of perceptual and motor skills like visual texture discrimination and finger sequence tapping can produce significant improvement (gain in skill at later retesting).

    “With regard to procedural memory, findings that sleep after training of perceptual and motor skills like visual texture discrimination and finger sequence tapping can produce significant improvement (i.e., a gain in skill at a later retesting) have pointed towards an active reprocessing of skill representations occurring during sleep that sharpens the respective representations (47,57,147,274,275,”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atienza, M., Cantero, J. L., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
  • University Pablo de Olavide, Spain
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2004-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
53-64
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2144302036
Cited by
151
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
perceptual learning, automaticity, auditory discrimination, sleep deprivation, event-related potentials, attentional effort, attentional shift, voluntary attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Discrimination Learning, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Field Dependence-Independence, Humans, Memory, Practice, Psychological, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review