Cited by 86Mind wandering and attentionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

States of mind: characterizing the neural bases of focus and mind-wandering through dynamic functional connectivity

Mooneyham, Benjamin W., Mrazek, Michael D., Mrazek, Alissa J., Mrazek, Kaita L., Phillips, Dawa T., Schooler, Jonathan W.·2017·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

During tasks that require continuous engagement, the mind alternates between mental states of focused attention and mind-wandering. Existing research has assessed the functional connectivity of intrinsic brain networks underlying the experience and training of these mental states using "static" approaches that assess connectivity across an entire task. To disentangle the different functional connectivity between brain regions that occur as the mind fluctuates between discrete brain states, we employed a dynamic functional connectivity approach that characterized brain activity using a sliding window. This approach identified distinct states of functional connectivity between regions of the executive control, salience, and default networks during a task requiring sustained attention to the sensations of breathing. The frequency of these distinct brain states demonstrated opposing correlations with dispositional mindfulness, suggesting a correspondence to the mental states of focused attention and mind-wandering. We then determined that an intervention emphasizing the cultivation of mindfulness increased the frequency of the state that had been associated with a greater propensity for focused attention, especially for those who improved most in dispositional mindfulness. These findings provide supporting evidence that mind-wandering involves the corecruitment of brain regions within the executive and default networks. More generally, this work illustrates how emerging neuroimaging methods may allow for the characterization of discrete brain states based on patterns of functional connectivity even when external indications of these states are difficult or impossible to measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_01066

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mindfulness research, meta-analyses and systematic reviews regularly lament the lack of consistency in findings, often citing the absence of consensus in construct specificity and operational definitions as a root cause.

    “Yet meta-analyses and systematic reviews regularly lament the lack of consistency in findings, often citing the absence of consensus in construct specificity and operational definitions as a root cause (Bishop et al., 2004; Mooneyham et al., 2016; Van Dam et al., 2018; Anālayo, 2019; Phan-Le et al., 2022).”

    From Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding (2024) · cites this paper as Mooneyham et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mooneyham, B. W., Mrazek, M. D., Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, K. L., Phillips, D. T., & Schooler, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
495-506
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2536168263
Cited by
86
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Institute of Education Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mind wandering, focused attention, dynamic functional connectivity, trait mindfulness, mindfulness-based interventions, frontoparietal network, salience network, default mode network, sustained attention, breathing, brain states, sliding window analysis
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Respiration, Thinking, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult, Executive Function, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review