Cited by 81Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attention

From State-to-Trait Meditation: Reconfiguration of Central Executive and Default Mode Networks

Open access
Bauer, C. C. C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Díaz, J. L., Pasaye, E. H., Barrios, F. A.·2019·eneuro

Abstract

While brain default mode network (DMN) activation in human subjects has been associated with mind wandering, meditation practice has been found to suppress it and to increase psychological well-being. In addition to DMN activity reduction, experienced meditators (EMs) during meditation practice show an increased connectivity between the DMN and the central executive network (CEN). However, the gradual change between DMN and CEN configuration from pre-meditation, during meditation, and post-meditation is unknown. Here, we investigated the change in DMN and CEN configuration by means of brain activity and functional connectivity (FC) analyses in EMs across three back-to-back functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans: pre-meditation baseline (trait), meditation (state), and post-meditation (state-to-trait). Pre-meditation baseline group comparison was also performed between EMs and healthy controls (HCs). Meditation trait was characterized by a significant reduction in activity and FC within DMN and increased anticorrelations between DMN and CEN. Conversely, meditation state and meditation state-to-trait periods showed increased activity and FC within the DMN and between DMN and CEN. However, the latter anticorrelations were only present in EMs with limited practice. The interactions between networks during these states by means of positive diametric activity (PDA) of the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFFs) defined as CEN fALFF¯ − DMN fALFF¯revealed no trait differences but significant increases during meditation state that persisted in meditation state-to-trait. The gradual reconfiguration in DMN and CEN suggest a neural mechanism by which the CEN negatively regulates the DMN and is probably responsible for the long-term trait changes seen in meditators and reported psychological well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/eneuro.0335-18.2019

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging studies revealed reduced default mode network activation and enhanced default mode network-central executive network connectivity in experienced meditators, suggesting the central executive network negatively regulates the default mode network.

    “Neuroimaging studies revealed reduced default mode network (DMN) activation and enhanced DMN-central executive network (CEN) connectivity in experienced meditators, suggesting that CEN negatively regulates the DMN (Bauer et al., 2019; Brewer et al., 2011; Garrison et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shapiro DH Jr, Walsh RN (1984) Meditation: classic and contemporary perspectives. Piscataway: Aldine Transactions Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, C. C. C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Díaz, J. L., Pasaye, E. H., & Barrios, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bauer, C. C. C.
  • Barrios, F. A.
Venue
eneuro
Published
2019-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
ENEURO.0335-18.2019
ISSN
2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987339752
Cited by
81
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CB167271, 250718 Doctoral fellowship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
meditation, default mode network, frontoparietal network, mind wandering, functional connectivity, experienced meditators, fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations, anticorrelation, psychological well-being, network reconfiguration
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Meditation, Functional Neuroimaging, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review