Cited by 491Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Bulimia nervosa in a Canadian community sample: prevalence and comparison of subgroups.

Paul E. Garfinkel, Elizabeth H.B. Lin, Paula N Goering, Cathy Spegg, David S. Goldbloom, Sidney H. Kennedy, Allan S. Kaplan, D. Blake Woodside·1995·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous epidemiological studies of bulimia nervosa have generated differing estimates of the incidence and prevalence of the disorder. These differences are attributable, in part, to varying definitions of the illness and a range of methodologies. The authors sought to define the prevalence of bulimia nervosa in a nonclinical community sample, examine the clinical significance of DSM-III-R threshold criteria, and examine comorbidity. METHOD: Subjects across Ontario (N = 8,116) were assessed with a structured interview, the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, with specific questions added for bulimia nervosa. Subjects who met DSM-III-R criteria for bulimia nervosa were compared with those who were missing only the frequency criterion (two or more binge-eating episodes per week for 3 months). RESULTS: In this sample, the lifetime prevalence of bulimia nervosa was 1.1% for female subjects and 0.1% for male subjects. The subjects with full- and partial-syndrome bulimia nervosa showed significant vulnerability for mood and anxiety disorders. Lifetime rates of alcohol dependence were high in the full-syndrome group. Rates of parental psychopathologies were high in both bulimic groups but tended to be higher in the subjects with full-syndrome bulimia nervosa. Both bulimic groups were significantly more likely to experience childhood sexual abuse than a normal female comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms other prevalence estimates of bulimia nervosa and its comorbid diagnoses from studies that were based on sound methodologies. It also points to the arbitrary aspects of the frequency of binge eating as a diagnostic threshold criterion for the disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.152.7.1052

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garfinkel, P. E., Lin, E. H. B., Goering, P. N., Spegg, C., Goldbloom, D. S., Kennedy, S. H., Kaplan, A. S., & Woodside, D. B.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
152
Issue
7
Pages
1052-1058
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1810793954
Cited by
491
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 28 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
23.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, prevalence, DSM-III-R criteria, binge eating frequency, comorbidities, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcoholism, parental psychopathology, child sexual abuse, sex differences, Ontario
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Mental Disorders, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review