The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalized Prediction of Psychosis: External Validation of the NAPLS-2 Psychosis Risk Calculator With the EDIPPP Project
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: As part of the second phase of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-2), Cannon and colleagues report, concurrently with the present article, on a risk calculator for the individualized prediction of a psychotic disorder in a 2-year period. The present study represents an external validation of the NAPLS-2 psychosis risk calculator using an independent sample of patients at clinical high risk for psychosis collected as part of the Early Detection, Intervention, and Prevention of Psychosis Program (EDIPPP). METHOD: Of the total EDIPPP sample of 210 subjects rated as being at clinical high risk based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, 176 had at least one follow-up assessment and were included in the construction of a new prediction model with six predictor variables in the NAPLS-2 psychosis risk calculator (unusual thoughts and suspiciousness, symbol coding test performance, verbal learning test performance, decline in social functioning, baseline age, and family history). Discrimination performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The NAPLS-2 risk calculator was then used to generate a psychosis risk estimate for each case in the external validation sample. RESULTS: The external validation model showed good discrimination, with an AUC of 0.790 (95% CI=0.644-0.937). In addition, the personalized risk generated by the risk calculator provided a solid estimation of the actual conversion outcome in the validation sample. CONCLUSIONS: Two independent samples of clinical high-risk patients converge to validate the NAPLS-2 psychosis risk calculator. This prediction calculator represents a meaningful step toward early intervention and the personalized treatment of psychotic disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“176 (16.6, US); 0.79 (AUC) 292 199 (19.1, China); 0.63 (AUC) 293 98 (18.59, US); 0.71 (AUC) 294”
From Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people (2021) · cites this paper as [292]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Stone, N. J., Robinson, J. G., Lichtenstein, A. H., Bairey Merz, C. N., Blum, C. B., Eckel, R. H., Goldberg, A. C., Gordon, D., Levy, D., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a · Cited by 7,081
Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Stuart, A., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2551606 · Cited by 3,403
Lindström, J., & Tuomilehto, J. O. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.725 · Cited by 1,937 · cited 1×
“A number of risk calculators are now freely available to the public and can estimate the risk, for example, of prostate, ovarian, breast, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer(4–6), type 2 diabetes(7, 8), and cardiovascular disease (9–11).”
BackgroundRidker, P. M., Buring, J. E., Rifai, N., & Cook, N. R. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.6.611 · Cited by 1,814
Miller, T. J., McGlashan, T. H., Rosen, J. L., Cadenhead, K. S., Ventura, J., McFarlane, W. R., Perkins, D. O., Pearlson, G. D., & Woods, S. W. (2003) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007040 · Cited by 1,800
Self-citationSome suggestions for measuring predictive performance
Sheiner, L. B., & Beal, S. L. (1981) · Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1007/bf01060893 · Cited by 1,618 · cited 1×
“MPE was calculated as the difference between the risk estimates generated by the external validation model and the NAPLS2 psychosis risk calculator, providing a metric for the tendency for overestimation/underestimation of risk(41).”
MethodBenedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726 · Cited by 1,597
The Psychosis High-Risk State: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review
Fusar-Poli, P., Borgwardt, S., Bechdolf, A., Addington, J., Riecher-Rössler, A., Schultze-Lutter, F., Keshavan, M., Wood, S., Ruhrmann, S., Seidman, L. J., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269 · Cited by 1,483 · cited 1×
“Advances include operationalizing and validating clinical criteria that identify individuals considered to be prodromal or at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, approximately 29% of whom will develop a psychotic illness over two years(13).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?
Moons, K. G. M., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b375 · Cited by 1,337 · cited 1×
“Over time, prevention has progressed from identifying populations at risk to personalizing risk estimates(1, 2).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Keefe R, 1999, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Manual–A: Version 2.1
- Siegel S, 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
- Loewy R, Schizophr Bull
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry
Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N. (2018) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037 · Cited by 966
An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis
Cannon, T. D., Yu, C., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Heinssen, R., Jeffries, C. D., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070890 · Cited by 574
“In a companion article (30), Carrión et al.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPreventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people
Fusar‐Poli, P., Correll, C. U., Arango, C., Berk, M., Patel, V., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20869 · Cited by 497
Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field
Abi‐Dargham, A., Moeller, S. J., Ali, F., DeLorenzo, C., Domschke, K., Horga, G., Jutla, A., Kotov, R., Paulus, M. P., Rubio, J. M., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21078 · Cited by 421
What is the risk‐benefit ratio of long‐term antipsychotic treatment in people with schizophrenia?
Correll, C. U., Rubio, J. M., & Kane, J. M. (2018) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20516 · Cited by 324
Association of Neurocognition With Transition to Psychosis
Seidman, L. J., Shapiro, D. I., Stone, W. S., Woodberry, K. A., Ronzio, A., Cornblatt, B. A., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., et al. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2479 · Cited by 276
Self-citationKoutsouleris, N., Dwyer, D. B., Degenhardt, F., Maj, C., Urquijo-Castro, M. F., Sanfelici, R., Popovic, D., Oeztuerk, O., Haas, S. S., Weiske, J., et al. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3604 · Cited by 275
de Pablo, G. S., Studerus, E., Vaquerizo‐Serrano, J., Irving, J., Catalán, A., Oliver, D., Baldwin, H., Danese, A., Fazel, S., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa120 · Cited by 234
Suijkerbuijk, Y. B., Schaafsma, F. G., van Mechelen, J., Ojajärvi, A., Corbière, M., & Anema, J. R. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011867.pub2 · Cited by 215
The Science of Prognosis in Psychiatry: A Review
Fusar-Poli, P., Hijazi, Z., Stahl, D., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2530 · Cited by 197
Hafeman, D., Merranko, J. A., Goldstein, T. R., Axelson, D., Goldstein, B. I., Monk, K., Hickey, M. B., Sakolsky, D. J., Diler, R. S., Iyengar, S., et al. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1763 · Cited by 173
Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia: An expert group paper on the current state of the art
Harvey, P. D., Bosia, M., Cavallaro, R., Howes, O. D., Kahn, R. S., Leucht, S., Müller, D., Penadés, R., & Vita, A. (2022) · Schizophrenia Research Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.scog.2022.100249 · Cited by 185
Early Detection and Preventive Intervention in Schizophrenia: From Fantasy to Reality
Lieberman, J. A., Small, S. A., & Girgis, R. R. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19080865 · Cited by 165
Perkins, D. O., Loohuis, L. M. O., Barbee, J., Ford, J. R., Jeffries, C. D., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., Cornblatt, B. A., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18060721 · Cited by 125
Self-citationCalkins, M. E., Moore, T. M., Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Turetsky, B. I., Roalf, D. R., Merikangas, K. R., Ruparel, K., Kohler, C. G., Gur, R. C., et al. (2017) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20386 · Cited by 127
Carrión, R. E., Auther, A. M., McLaughlin, D., Olsen, R. H., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2018) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby126 · Cited by 107
Self-citationFusar-Poli, P., Werbeloff, N., Rutigliano, G., Oliver, D., Davies, C., Stahl, D., McGuire, P., & Osborn, D. (2019) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sby070 · Cited by 95
From the psychosis prodrome to the first-episode of psychosis: No evidence of a cognitive decline
Carrión, R. E., Walder, D. J., Auther, A. M., McLaughlin, D., Zyla, H. O., Adelsheim, S. N., Calkins, R., Carter, C. S., McFarland, B. H., Melton, R. P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.014 · Cited by 94
“…ME; Glen Oaks, NY; Ann Arbor, MI; Salem, OR; Sacramento, CA; Albuquerque, NM. Details of the study design, study implementation, assessments, psychosocial and pharmacological treatments, methods, and sample characteristics have been reported elsewhere (Carrión et al., 2016; McFarlane et al., 2015).”
MethodSelf-citationFusar-Poli, P., Sullivan, S. A., Shah, J. L., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774 · Cited by 92
“This is a substantial advantage compared with the current CHR-P strategy, which is limited by group-level prediction, at risk or not at risk, with few exceptions such as the risk calculator by Cannon et al (58, 59).”
MethodResultZhang, T., Xu, L., Tang, Y., Li, H., Tang, X., Cui, H., Wei, Y., Wang, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, X., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718002738 · Cited by 82
“Moreover, the accuracy of the SIPS-RC reported in this study (AUC = 0.74) is comparable with the results of previous studies developing and evaluating the performance of the NAPLS-2 calculator (0.71 and 0.79, respectively) (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016).”
MethodResultInfluentialWannan, C., Nelson, B., Addington, J., Allott, K., Anticevic, A., Arango, C., Baker, J. T., Bearden, C. E., Billah, T., Sylvain Bouix, A., et al. (2024) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbae011 · Cited by 96
Self-citationBirmaher, B., Merranko, J. A., Goldstein, T. R., Gill, M. K., Goldstein, B. I., Hower, H., Yen, S., Hafeman, D., Strober, M., Diler, R. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.05.023 · Cited by 81
Sanfelici, R., Dwyer, D. B., Antonucci, L. A., & Koutsouleris, N. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.009 · Cited by 82
“(74) UHR Multimodal: symptoms, environment,”
‘At risk mental state’ clinics for psychosis – an idea whose time has come – and gone!
Ajnakina, O., David, A. S., & Murray, R. M. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718003859 · Cited by 82
“Some more recent reports, however, have suggested that the transition rates from the ARMS phase to clinical psychosis are as low as 8–17% within a 2-year period (Morrison et al., 2012; Carrion et al., 2016; Conrad et al., 2017; Malla et al., 2017).”
The Maudsley environmental risk score for psychosis
Vassos, E., Sham, P. C., Kempton, M. J., Trotta, A., Stilo, S. A., Gayer-Anderson, C. E., Forti, M. D., Lewis, C. M., Murray, R. M., & Morgan, C. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002319 · Cited by 88
“Other existing risk calculators focus on the prediction of psychosis among individuals who have already developed a prodromal risk syndrome (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016) or patients accessing secondary mental health care (Fusar-Poli et al.”
Ho, N. F., Holt, D. J., Cheung, M. W. ‐., Iglesias, J. E., Goh, A., Wang, M., Lim, J. K. W., de Souza, J., Poh, J. S., See, Y. M., et al. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.5 · Cited by 80
“(Cannon et al, 2008; Yung et al, 2003), although they are similar to recent at-risk cohorts across multiple worldwide sites (Cannon et al, 2016; Carrion et al, 2016; Ruhrmann et al, 2010); indeed, rates of conversion have been steadily declining over the past decade to ~ 7–15% (FusarPoli et al,…”
ResultBrucato, G., Masucci, M. D., Arndt, L. Y., Ben‐David, S., Colibazzi, T., Corcoran, C. M., Crumbley, A. H., Crump, F. M., Gill, K. E., Kimhy, D., et al. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717000319 · Cited by 78
“Some recent studies (Cannon et al. 2016; Carrion et al. 2016) have proposed combining current CHR criteria with specific demographic factors, as well as various neurocognitive, psychosocial and/or biometric assessments, to develop algorithms with improved predictive power.”
BackgroundZhang, T., Li, H., Tang, Y., Niznikiewicz, M. A., Shenton, M. E., Keshavan, M. S., Stone, W. S., McCarley, R. W., Seidman, L. J., & Wang, J. (2018) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010036 · Cited by 71
Hamilton, H., Roach, B. J., Bachman, P., Belger, A., Carrión, R. E., Duncan, E., Johannesen, J., Light, G. A., Niznikiewicz, M. A., Addington, J., et al. (2022) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1417 · Cited by 72
Self-citationCollins, M. A., Ji, J. L., Chung, Y., Lympus, C. A., Afriyie-Agyemang, Y., Addington, J., Goodyear, B. G., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Mirzakhanian, H., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01870-7 · Cited by 67
Self-citationPredictors of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk
Addington, J., Farris, M. S., Stowkowy, J., Santesteban‐Echarri, O., Metzak, P. D., & Kalathil, M. S. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1027-y · Cited by 69
Sydnor, V. J., & Roalf, D. R. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.06.028 · Cited by 68
Labad, J. (2018) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.028 · Cited by 67
Bolt, L. K., Amminger, G. P., Farhall, J., McGorry, P. D., Nelson, B., Markulev, C., Yuen, H. P., Schäfer, M. R., Mossaheb, N., Schlögelhofer, M., et al. (2018) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.013 · Cited by 66
Woods, S. W., Walsh, B. C., Powers, A. R., & McGlashan, T. H. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17336-4_5 · Cited by 65
Peh, O. H., Rapisarda, A., & Lee, J. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171800394x · Cited by 61
“This is because 6–17% of UHR individuals develop psychosis during the observational window (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016), and this risk is significantly higher when individuals are not identified early to receive intervention services (Simon and Umbricht, 2010; Fusar-Poli et al.,…”
BackgroundKoutsouleris, N., Worthington, M., Dwyer, D., Kambeitz‐Ilankovic, L., Sanfelici, R., Fusar‐Poli, P., Rosen, M., Ruhrmann, S., Anticevic, A., Addington, J., et al. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.023 · Cited by 58
Self-citationDean, D. J., Walther, S., Bernard, J. A., & Mittal, V. A. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618773759 · Cited by 57
“Each CHR participant was also rated on a recently developed calculation of probability for psychosis conversion (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016) at the same time point as the motor assessment.”
Methodde Pablo, G. S., Besana, F., Arienti, V., Catalán, A., Vaquerizo‐Serrano, J., Cabras, A., Pereira, J. F., Soardo, L., Coronelli, F., Kaur, S., et al. (2021) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100909 · Cited by 57
“While a plethora of prediction models have been developed and validated on the transition to psychosis and psychosis onset in CHR-P [64-72], only a few have evaluated non-psychotic outcomes [73,74].”
BackgroundProgression from being at-risk to psychosis: next steps
Addington, J., Farris, M. S., Devoe, D. J. A., & Metzak, P. D. (2020) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-020-00117-0 · Cited by 59
Chan, V. (2017) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.014 · Cited by 68
Rosen, M., Betz, L. T., Schultze‐Lutter, F., Chisholm, K., Haidl, T. K., Kambeitz‐Ilankovic, L., Bertolino, A., Borgwardt, S., Brambilla, P., Lencer, R., et al. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.032 · Cited by 55
Prediction of conversion to psychosis in individuals with an at-risk mental state
Riecher‐Rössler, A., & Studerus, E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000320 · Cited by 61
Kline, E. R., Seidman, L. J., Cornblatt, B. A., Woodberry, K. A., Bryant, C., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.05.032 · Cited by 58
“This work complements recent research establishing individualized risk prediction from clinical and neuropsychological factors that can easily be assessed in individuals meeting SIPS criteria for high risk states (see Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA predictive model for conversion to psychosis in clinical high-risk patients
Ciarleglio, A., Brucato, G., Masucci, M. D., Altschuler, R., Colibazzi, T., Corcoran, C. M., Crump, F. M., Horga, G., Lehembre-Shiah, E., Leong, W., et al. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171800171x · Cited by 53
“developed a risk calculator that was published online and allows a clinician to obtain individualized 2-year conversion risks by way of an assessment battery that includes the SIPS, neurocognitive tests, and several clinical measures inclusive of stressful life events (Carrión et al., 2016).”
MethodOliver, D., Spada, G., Colling, C., Broadbent, M., Baldwin, H., Patel, R., Stewart, R., Stahl, D., Dobson, R., McGuire, P., et al. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.007 · Cited by 49
Kafadar, E., Mittal, V. A., Strauss, G. P., Chapman, H. C., Ellman, L. M., Bansal, S., Gold, J. M., Alderson‐Day, B., Evans, S., Moffatt, J. A., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.017 · Cited by 50
“, 2016) and the use of clinical measures alone, while promising, is nonetheless limited inpredicting course and triggering treatment initiation (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLongitudinal perspectives on the psychosis spectrum in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Tang, S. X., & Gur, R. E. (2017) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.38500 · Cited by 48
“…to psychosis among individuals at elevated clinical risk by higher levels of unusual thought content and suspiciousness, greater decline in social functioning, younger baseline age, and impairments in verbal learning, memory, and processing speed (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016).”
BackgroundCollin, G., Nieto-Castañón, A., Shenton, M. E., Pasternak, O., Kelly, S., Keshavan, M. S., Seidman, L. J., McCarley, R. W., Niznikiewicz, M. A., Li, H., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102108 · Cited by 46
“This analysis showed that while the association between DMN hyperconnectivity and poor outcome is indeed driven by the converter group, the association between FPN hyperconnectivity and poor outcome seems to be driven mainly by the treatment-refractory group, who show significantly higher FPN within-network connectivi…”
BackgroundInfluentialPredictors of transition in patients with clinical high risk for psychosis: an umbrella review
Andreou, C., Eickhoff, S., Heide, M., de Bock, R., Obleser, J., & Borgwardt, S. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02586-0 · Cited by 50
“Large samples and harmonization of methods are necessary to overcome the limitations of a currently still very heterogeneous fi eld of research.”
BackgroundAlterations in facial expressivity in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.
Gupta, T., Haase, C. M., Strauss, G. P., Cohen, A. S., & Mittal, V. A. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000413 · Cited by 44
“Carrión and colleagues (2016) also replicated these results in an independent sample using the same calculation procedure (Carrión et al., 2016).”
Worthington, M., & Cannon, T. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770774 · Cited by 47
Neurocognitive profiles in the prodrome to psychosis in NAPLS-1
Velthorst, E., Meyer, E. C., Giuliano, A. J., Addington, J., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., Cornblatt, B. A., McGlashan, T. H., Perkins, D. O., Tsuang, M. T., et al. (2018) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.038 · Cited by 44
“Advances have been made in developing “risk calculators” for the prediction of conversion to psychosis using combinations of symptoms, neurocognitive scores, social and role function measures and environmental variables (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016; Michel et al., 2014), and some have begun to incorporat…”
BackgroundSelf-citationCui, H., Giuliano, A. J., Zhang, T., Xu, L., Wei, Y., Tang, Y., Qian, Z., Stone, L., Li, H., Whitfield, S., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.06.018 · Cited by 45
Psychosis superspectrum I: Nosology, etiology, and lifespan development
Jonas, K. G., Cannon, T. D., Docherty, A. R., Dwyer, D., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., Nelson, B., Reininghaus, U., & Kotov, R. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02388-2 · Cited by 45
“Reality distortion symptoms are the strongest predictor of transition to psychotic disorder in CHR-P [166, 183], but personality disorders do not consistently predict transition [174].”
Woods, S. W., Bearden, C. E., Sabb, F. W., Stone, W. S., Torous, J. B., Cornblatt, B. A., Perkins, D. O., Cadenhead, K. S., Addington, J., Powers, A. R., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.020 · Cited by 41
Self-citationMalda, A., Boonstra, N., Barf, H., de Jong, S., Aleman, A., Addington, J., Pruessner, M., Nieman, D. H., de Haan, L., Morrison, A. P., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00345 · Cited by 39
“(16) [which has been externally validated (17)], the pretest risk enrichment stratification algorithm by Fusar-Poli et al.”
MethodUsing Electronic Health Records to Facilitate Precision Psychiatry
Oliver, D., Arribas, M., Perry, B. I., Whiting, D., Blackman, G., Krakowski, K., Seyedsalehi, A., Osimo, E. F., Griffiths, S. L., Stahl, D. R., et al. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.02.1006 · Cited by 40
Hatzimanolis, A., Avramopoulos, D., Arking, D. E., Moes, A., Bhatnagar, P., Lencz, T., Malhotra, A. K., Giakoumaki, S. G., Roussos, P., Smyrnis, N., et al. (2017) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx074 · Cited by 39
Youth at-risk for serious mental illness: methods of the PROCAN study
Addington, J., Goldstein, B. I., Wang, J., Kennedy, S. H., Bray, S., Lebel, C. A., Hassel, S., Marshall, C., & MacQUEEN, G. M. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1801-0 · Cited by 37
Fusar‐Poli, P., Stringer, D., Durieux, A. M. S., Rutigliano, G., Bonoldi, I., Micheli, A. D., & Stahl, D. R. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0600-9 · Cited by 37
Social decline in the psychosis prodrome: Predictor potential and heterogeneity of outcome
Carrión, R. E., Auther, A. M., McLaughlin, D., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cannon, T. D., Keshavan, M., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.09.006 · Cited by 36
“We propose that CHR heterogeneity can be used to refine risk profiles, point to false positive identifications, and potentially provide additional information about long-term functioning in addition to conversion to psychosis (Cornblatt and Carrión, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationOsborne, K. J., & Mittal, V. A. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.034 · Cited by 31
“On the basis of previous work showing good discrimination performance for both the NAPLS-2 and SIPS-RC in CHR samples (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018b), and discrimination performance less than chance (AUC < .”
MethodResultInfluentialLee, J., Jang, H. G., Kim, J.-K., & Min, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38886-z · Cited by 35
Zhang, T., Xu, L., Li, H., Woodberry, K. A., Kline, E. R., Jiang, J., Cui, H., Tang, Y., Tang, X., Wei, Y., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171900360x · Cited by 34
“Consistent with the NAPLS-2-RC (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016) and our previous findings (Li et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017), the baseline severity level of positive symptoms, global function decline, and the BACS neurocognitive tests were significant predictors of psychosis in the…”
BackgroundResultStuderus, E., Beck, K., Fusar‐Poli, P., & Riecher‐Rössler, A. (2019) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz059 · Cited by 32
An Update on Promising Biomarkers in Schizophrenia
Goldsmith, D. R., Crooks, C. L., Walker, E. F., & Cotes, R. O. (2018) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20170046 · Cited by 32
Incorporating cortisol into the NAPLS2 individualized risk calculator for prediction of psychosis
Worthington, M., Walker, E. F., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., Perkins, D. O., Seidman, L. J., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.09.022 · Cited by 31
“Although the original model has already been validated in an external sample and validity has been established (Carrión et al., 2016), in the present study, the models were evaluated with and without the same bootstrapping method for consistency.”
MethodSelf-citationOliver, D., Wong, C. M. J., Bøg, M., Jönsson, L., Kinon, B. J., Wehnert, A., Jørgensen, K. T., Irving, J., Stahl, D. R., McGuire, P. K., et al. (2020) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-020-01032-9 · Cited by 29
Fortea, A., Batalla, A., Raduà, J., van Eijndhoven, P., Baeza, I., Albajes‐Eizagirre, A., Fusar‐Poli, P., Castro‐Fornieles, J., de la Serna, E., Luna, L., et al. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2021.05.008 · Cited by 27
Enhancing Psychosis Risk Prediction Through Computational Cognitive Neuroscience
Gold, J. M., Corlett, P. R., Strauss, G. P., Schiffman, J. E., Ellman, L. M., Walker, E. F., Powers, A. R., Woods, S. W., Waltz, J. A., Silverstein, S. M., et al. (2020) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa091 · Cited by 25
MacNeill, L. A., Allen, N. B., Poleon, R. B., Vargas, T., Osborne, K. J., Damme, K. S. F., Barch, D. M., Krogh‐Jespersen, S., Nielsen, A. N., Norton, E. S., et al. (2021) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579421000651 · Cited by 25
“…of the research on mental health risk calculators, albeit small, is on the conversion to psychosis from prodromal stages (Cannon et al., 2008, 2016; Carrión et al., 2016; Ciarleglio et al., 2019; Fusar-Poli, Davies et al., 2019; Fusar-Poli et al., 2017; Fusar-Poli, Werbeloff et al., 2019; Irving…”
BackgroundConrad, A. M., Lewin, T. J., Sly, K. A., Schall, U., Halpin, S. A., Hunter, M., & Carr, V. J. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.005 · Cited by 25
“, 2015); personalised calculation of psychosis risk (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016); non-transition and symptom remission (Lin et al.”
BackgroundHengartner, M. P., Heekeren, K., Dvorsky, D. N., Walitza, S., Wulf Rössler, A., & Theodoridou, A. (2017) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.026 · Cited by 30
“On a descriptive level, the prognostic accuracy of this model is markedly better than the 71% [17] and 79% [18] reported”
ResultPrediction of psychosis: model development and internal validation of a personalized risk calculator
Lee, T. Y., Hwang, W. J., Kim, N. S., Park, I., Lho, S. K., Moon, S.-Y., Oh, S., Lee, J., Kim, M., Woo, C.-W., et al. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720004675 · Cited by 24
Community Psychosis Risk Screening: An Instrument Development Investigation
Ellman, L. M., Schiffman, J. E., & Mittal, V. A. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science · doi:10.20900/jpbs.20200019 · Cited by 25
“Additionally, there are a number of other symptom domains and risk factors that are commonly found in both the prodromal and premorbid periods of psychosis, that likely can improve prediction of CHR for psychosis when assessed along with APPS (see Preliminary Studies) and have been demonstrated to improve prediction o…”
BackgroundReilly, T. J., Mechelli, A., McGuire, P. K., Fusar‐Poli, P., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2019) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/14581 · Cited by 22
“Carrión et al 2016 [54]”
BackgroundPersonalized medicine for schizophrenia
Buckley, P. F., & Miller, B. J. (2017) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-016-0001-5 · Cited by 21
Puntis, S., Oliver, D., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2021) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2021.01.005 · Cited by 21
Chung, Y., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., Perkins, D. O., Seidman, L. J., Tsuang, M. T., et al. (2019) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.026 · Cited by 20
Self-citationDiscovery and Validation of Prediction Algorithms for Psychosis in Youths at Clinical High Risk
Worthington, M., Cao, H., & Cannon, T. D. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006 · Cited by 21
Osborne, K. J., Vargas, T., & Mittal, V. A. (2019) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579419000385 · Cited by 19
“Discriminant validity for classifying CHR individuals who did and did not convert was demonstrated in a well-powered study (Cannon et al., 2016) that was replicated in an independent sample (Carrión et al., 2016).”
MethodResultKotlicka‐Antczak, M., Karbownik, M. S., Stawiski, K., Pawełczyk, A. M., Żurner, N., Pawełczyk, T., Strzelecki, D., & Fusar‐Poli, P. (2019) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.02.007 · Cited by 19
Zhang, T., Yang, S., Xu, L., Tang, X., Wei, Y., Cui, H., Li, H., Tang, Y., Hui, L., Li, C., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002174 · Cited by 17
“Finally, as emphasized by Cannon (Cannon et al., 2016) and Carrion (Carrion et al., 2016), the risk calculator remains experimental.”
BackgroundWorthington, M., Miklowitz, D. J., O’Brien, M. P., Addington, J., Bearden, C. E., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Mathalon, D. H., McGlashan, T. H., Perkins, D. O., et al. (2020) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12914 · Cited by 17
“, 2016) which has been validated in external samples (Carrión et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationGawęda, Ł., Pionke‐Ubych, R., Arciszewska, A., Prochwicz, K., Frydecka, D., Misiak, B., Cechnicki, A., Cicero, D. C., & Nelson, B. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.044 · Cited by 18
“In the clinical context, it was shown that considering a combination of different risk factors increase the predictive power for the development of full-blown psychosis above the presence of subclinical psychotic symptoms (Cannon et al., 2016; Carrión et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMoore, T. M., Calkins, M. E., Rosen, A. F. G., Butler, E. R., Ruparel, K., Fusar‐Poli, P., Koutsouleris, N., McGuire, P. K., Cannon, T. D., Gur, R. C., et al. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720005231 · Cited by 16
“This calculator was later replicated and extended by Carrión et al. (2016), Zhang et al. (2018) and Osborne and Mittal (2019).”
MethodCrouse, J. J., Ho, N., Scott, J., Parker, R., Park, S. H., Couvy-Duchesne, B., Mitchell, B. L., Byrne, E. M., Hermens, D. F., Medland, S. E., et al. (2022) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.23 · Cited by 14
“First, feeling threatened by others at 19Up was associated with progression to a psychotic-like subthreshold syndrome, consistent with reports from the USA [7, 40] and China [41] showing that higher levels of suspiciousness predict conversion from a clinical high risk state to a full-threshold psychotic disorder; it i…”
ResultInfluentialComputerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk
Mittal, V. A., Ellman, L. M., Strauss, G. P., Walker, E. F., Corlett, P. R., Schiffman, J. E., Woods, S. W., Powers, A. R., Silverstein, S. M., Waltz, J. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science · doi:10.20900/jpbs.20210011 · Cited by 18
“One important product from this effort is the North American Prodromal Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) risk-calculator [17,18], which is a tool that shows Mittal et al.”
MethodThe many roads to psychosis: recent advances in understanding risk and mechanisms
Bearden, C. E., & Forsyth, J. K. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.16574.1 · Cited by 16
Zhang, T., Xu, L., Tang, Y., Cui, H., Wei, Y., Tang, X., Hu, Q., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Jiang, L., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32215-6 · Cited by 15
Guo, J. Y., Niendam, T. A., Auther, A. M., Carrión, R. E., Cornblatt, B. A., Ragland, J. D., Adelsheim, S. N., Calkins, R., Sale, T. G., Taylor, S. F., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002332 · Cited by 17
Self-citationTarbox-Berry, S. I., Perkins, D. O., Woods, S. W., & Addington, J. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717002343 · Cited by 14
“…prediction of unusual thought content and suspiciousness is particularly noteworthy given that these twopositive symptomsare central to theAPSSdiagnosis and are key predictors of psychosis in APSS youth (Cannon et al. 2008, 2016; Addington et al. 2015; Carrion et al. 2016; Brucato et al. 2017).”
BackgroundBhattacharyya, S., Schoeler, T., Patel, R., Forti, M. D., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.09.016 · Cited by 14
Addington, J., Liu, L., Braun, A., Brummitt, K., Cadenhead, K. S., Cornblatt, B. A., Holden, J. L., & Granholm, E. (2023) · Schizophrenia Bulletin Open · doi:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad020 · Cited by 14
Self-citationA genetics-guided approach to the clinical management of schizophrenia
Besterman, A. D. (2023) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2023.09.042 · Cited by 15
Limited generalizability of multivariate brain-based dimensions of child psychiatric symptoms
Xu, B., Dall’Aglio, L., Flournoy, J. C., Bortsova, G., Tervo‐Clemmens, B., Collins, P. F., de Bruijne, M., Luciana, M. M., Marquand, A. F., Wang, H., et al. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00063-y · Cited by 17
“Thishasbeen widelyimplementedinthevalidationofpredictionmodelsinmedical research 22,23 and recommended as a necessary step in prediction models 24 .”
Mamah, D. T., Mutiso, V., & Ndetei, D. M. (2022) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.031 · Cited by 13
“Other symptom domains such as negative symptoms or cognition are likely relevant and may increase the effectiveness of psychosis-risk screening tools (Cannon et al., 2008; Cannon et al., 2016; Carrion et al., 2016; Ellman et al., 2020; Woods et al., 2009).”
BackgroundLoch, A. A., Gondim, J. M., Argôlo, F. C., Lopes-Rocha, A. C., Andrade, J. C., van de Bilt, M. T., de Jesus, L. P., Haddad, N. M., Cecchi, G., Mota, N. B., et al. (2023) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2023.07.011 · Cited by 15
“There are several studies addressing risk of conversion within ARMS samples — including the development of several risk calculators (Carri ´ on et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019) — but those aiming to distinguish between ARMS and control individuals are…”
BackgroundResultZhang, T., Wei, Y., Cui, H., Tang, X., Xu, L., Hu, Y., Tang, Y., Liu, H., Chen, T., Li, C., et al. (2023) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115385 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrión, R. E., Cornblatt, B. A., Burton, C. Z., Tso, I. F., Auther, A. M., Adelsheim, S., Calkins, R., Carter, C. S., Niendam, T., Sale, T. G., Taylor, S. F., & McFarlane, W. R.
- Affiliations
- Northwell Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 989-996
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- PMC
- PMC5048503
- OpenAlex
- W2462155653
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 23.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000434)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061523, P30MH074543, R01MH059883, K23MH087708, R21MH101676, K23MH108823, U01MH081857)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- psychosis prediction, clinical high risk for psychosis, external validation, early detection and intervention, prodromal psychosis, transition to psychosis, suspicion, symbol coding, verbal learning, family history (medicine), personalized treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult, Prodromal Symptoms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
