The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy
Abstract
The gig economy has captured public and policy interest and is growing as an area of academic inquiry, prompting debate about the future of work, labour regulation, and the impact of technology and job quality. This special issue provides a timely intervention into that debate with this article providing an introductory overview, positioning the articles within a comprehensive literature review of existing scholarship on the gig economy. These articles add to our understanding of the organisation and experience of work in the digitally enabled gig economy in a variety of national settings. They explore aspects such as job quality, forms of collectivity, identity development, and algorithmic management and control. This article also delineates avenues for further research regarding conditions for gig workers, the impact of gig work and information, technology and gig work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839218759646 · Cited by 744
Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?
(2019) · OECD Economics Department Working Papers · doi:10.1787/fdb0570b-en · Cited by 137
Chan, N. K. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819837736 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Abhinav K, Dubey A, Jain S, et al. (2017) CrowdAdvisor: A framework for freelancer assessment in online marketplace. In: IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track (ICSE-SEIP) , 20–28 May, Buenos Aires, pp. 93–102. · DOI
- 10.1093/oxrep/gry006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-018-3975-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_25 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Bajwa U, 2018, Globalization and Health, 14
- 10.1111/ntwe.12038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1086026619846455 · DOI
- 10.1057/s11369-018-00106-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-49454-8_8 · DOI
- 10.1287/msom.2017.0618 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19376812.2019.1607149 · DOI
- 10.1177/0893318916687397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17645/mac.v6i2.1316 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444817729149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Daher N, 2018, CNBC @Work
- De Stefano V, 2016, Industrial Law Journal, 46, 185, 10.1093/indlaw/dww034 · DOI
- De Stefano V, 2016, The Rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the ‘gig economy’
- 10.1177/1056492619832119 · DOI
- 10.1002/soej.12338 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.23086 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022185618800518 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022185619839428 · DOI
- Fox MA, 2018, Environment International, 115
- 10.4337/roke.2014.02.03 · DOI · Paper page
- Gandhi A, Hidayanto A, Sucahyo Y, et al. (2018) Exploring people’s intention to become platform-based gig workers: An empirical qualitative study. In: 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) , 22–26 October, Conference Proceedings, pp. 266–271. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0022185618817069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/9781108255882.025 · DOI
- 10.17979/ejge.2018.7.1.4330 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017018760136 · DOI · Paper page
- Jiang L, Wagner C and Nardi B (2015) Not just in it for the money: A qualitative investigation of workers’ perceived benefits of micro-task crowdsourcing. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 5–8 January Conference Proceedings, pp. 773–782. · DOI
- Johnston H, 2018, Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy
- 10.1177/0022185619848461 · DOI
- Kaine S, The Research Agenda for the Future of Work
- Kaine S, Contemporary Work and the Future of Employment in Developed Societies
- 10.1017/jmo.2016.30 · DOI
- Leximancer, 2018, Leximancer User Guide, Release 4.5
- 10.1177/1440783319837604 · DOI
- Manyika J, 2016, Independent Work: Choice, Necessity, and the Gig Economy
- 10.1080/17439884.2018.1504792 · DOI
- Minifie J, 2016, Peer to peer pressure: Policy for the sharing economy.
- 10.1080/13683500.2019.1618249 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10672-018-9318-8 · DOI
- Prudential, 2017, Gig Workers in America
- Prudential, 2018, Gig Economy Impact by Generation
- 10.1111/jpim.12312 · DOI · Paper page
- Renan-Barzilay A, 2017, Seton Hall Law Review, 47, 393
- 10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.007 · DOI
- Salinesi C, Kusumah I, Rohleder C, et al. (2018) New approach for supporting future collaborative business in automotive industry. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) , Stuttgart, 17–20 June, Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–9. · DOI
- Sarasua C, Thimm M. Crowd work CV: Recognition for micro work. InInternational Conference on Social Informatics 2014 Nov 10 (pp. 429–437). Springer, Cham. · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240907400104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13600869.2018.1457001 · DOI
- Scholz T, 2017, Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers are Disrupting the Digital Economy
- 10.1177/0730888418762263 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-017-3484-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1035304617722461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.trb.2019.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/1046669X.2017.1347003 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818773727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1024258917701381 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017019836911 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang J, Pan J and Li Y (2018) The optimal strategies of online car-hailing platform based on the cost difference of drivers. In: 2018 15th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM) , Hangzhou, 21–22 July, Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–5. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.003 · DOI
- 10.4159/9780674726123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0038038519828906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ntwe.12112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0022185619854472 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.004 · DOI
Cited by
Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research
Wu, D., & Huang, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2775 · Cited by 168
Boundaryless careers and algorithmic constraints in the gig economy
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1953565 · Cited by 129
Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Ishizaka, A., Gupta, M., & Shankar, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.023 · Cited by 104
Technologically mediated human resource management in the gig economy
McDonnell, A., Carbery, R., Burgess, J., & Sherman, U. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1986109 · Cited by 82
Barriers to entry of gig workers in the gig platforms: exploring the dark side of the gig economy
Behl, A., Rajagopal, K., Sheorey, P., & Mahendra, A. (2022) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2021-0235 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaine, S., & Josserand, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-08-20
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-501
- ISSN
- 0022-1856 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-9296
- OpenAlex
- W2969542118
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 44.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022185619865480
- The paper
- Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2019). The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. Journal of Industrial Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619865480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
