Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,066

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance

Anderson, Rolph E.·1973·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

Four psychological theories are considered in determining the effects of disconfirmed expectations on perceived product performance and consumer satisfaction. Results reveal that too great a gap between high consumer expectations and actual product performance may cause a less favorable evaluation of a product than a somewhat lower level of disparity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224377301000106

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · cited 1×

    “An unconfirmed expectancy, according to Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance, creates a state of dissonance or "psychological discomfort" because the outcome contradicts the consumer's original hypothesis [13].”

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
1973-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W1979756272
Cited by
1,066
References
1
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.