Cited by 129Social and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Relations Between Implicit and Explicit Measures of Attitudes and Measures of Behavior: Evidence of Moderation by Individual Difference Variables

Conner, Mark T., Perugini, Marco, O'Gorman, Rick, Ayres, Karen, Prestwich, Andrew·2007·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The moderating role of individual difference variables (Self-Reported Habit Index [SRHI], Need for Cognition [NFC]) on relationships between implicit (Implicit Association Test [IAT], Extrinsic Affective Simon Test [EAST]) or explicit measures of attitude and behavior is assessed in two studies. A dissociation pattern is found on self-report diary measures of behavior. In Study 1, the EAST—behavior relationship is moderated by SRHI; explicit measures of the attitude—behavior relationship are moderated by NFC. In Study 2, the IAT—behavior relationship is moderated by SRHI; explicit measures of the attitude—behavior relationship are moderated by NFC. Higher levels of SRHI and NFC are associated with stronger relationships between the implicit or explicit measures of attitude and the measure of behavior. In Study 2, the SRHI × IAT interaction is replicated for an objective behavior measure. Implications for understanding the relationship between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167207309194

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conner, M. T., Perugini, M., O'Gorman, R., Ayres, K., & Prestwich, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • University of Kent
Corresponding author
Conner, Mark T.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2007-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
1727-1740
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1982279429
Cited by
129
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
23.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, attitude-behavior relationship, Implicit Association Test, need for cognition, individual differences, moderation, self-reported behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Behavior, England, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychology, Social, Self Disclosure, User-Computer Interface, Evidence-Based Medicine, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review