Cited by 17Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Motivated cultural worldview adherence and culturally loaded test performance

Landau, Mark J., Greenberg, Jeff, Rothschild, Zachary K.·2009·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Academic tests and their conditions of administration are culturally loaded when they make salient culturally specific knowledge structures in addition to measuring the intended cognitive ability. Cultural loading demonstrably influences test performance, but why? Drawing on converging perspectives on the psychological function of culture, this article proposes that one factor is the individual's internal motivation to affirm and uphold the cultural worldview. This possibility is tested within the framework of terror management theory, which claims that cultural worldview adherence defends against mortality-related concerns. It is hypothesized that making mortality salient would (a) improve performance on standardized test items when, incidental to the problem structure, the correct answers affirm prevailing cultural stereotypes and (b) impair test performance when excelling violates stereotypic expectancies for one's group. Two studies provide support for these hypotheses. Implications for test validity are briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167208329630

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience improves performance on academic tasks such as reading comprehension.

    “Other work has similarly shown that MS enhances basketball performance [36] and improves performance on academic tasks (e.g., reading comprehension) [37,38].”

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landau, M. J., Greenberg, J., & Rothschild, Z. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Landau, Mark J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2009-01-22
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
442-453
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2054742909
Cited by
17
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
test performance, terror management theory, mortality salience, cultural stereotypes, standardized testing, test validity
MeSH terms
Culture, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Identification, Stereotyping, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review