Cited by 648Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyHistory, Medicine, and Leadership

Comparing Clinical and Social‐Personality Conceptualizations of Narcissism

Miller, Joshua D., Campbell, W. Keith·2008·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a lack of consensus surrounding the conceptualization of narcissism. The present study compared two measures of narcissism—one used in clinical settings (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire, PDQ‐4+; Hyler, 1994) and one used in social‐personality research (Narcissistic Personality Inventory, NPI; Raskin & Terry, 1988)—across two samples. Sample 1 (N=271) was composed of undergraduates, whereas Sample 2 (N=211) was composed of parents of the Sample 1 participants. The scales were significantly interrelated but manifested divergent relations with general personality traits, personality disorders (including expert prototypal ratings of narcissism), recollections of parenting received, and psychological distress and self‐esteem. PDQ‐4 narcissism captured an emotionally unstable, negative‐affect‐laden, and introverted variant of narcissism; NPI narcissism captured an emotionally resilient, extraverted form. The clinical and social‐personality conceptualizations of narcissism primarily share a tendency to use an antagonistic interpersonal style. Implications for the DSM‐V are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00492.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings mirror other studies demonstrating strong empirical ties between vulnerable narcissism and the majority of DSM-based PDs.

    “These findings mirror other studies that demonstrate strong empirical ties between vulnerable narcissism and the majority of DSM-based PDs (Miller & Campbell 2008, Miller et al. 2011).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Campbell 2008

  • The samples chosen may depend on beliefs about the core of narcissism, such that social-personality psychologists use undergraduate or online panel samples, whereas clinical psychologists and psychiatrists prefer clinical samples.

    “The samples chosen may depend on beliefs about the core of narcissism (Ackerman et al. 2016a, Miller & Campbell 2008) such that social-personality psychologists, who are most interested in grandiose narcissism, use undergraduate or online panel samples, whereas clinical psychologists”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Miller & Campbell 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Joshua D.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-08
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
449-476
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1987739816
Cited by
648
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 30
FWCI
33.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
Keywords
narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, personality disorders, self-esteem, psychological distress, parenting, DSM-V, narcissistic personality traits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Concept, Intergenerational Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review