Cited by 491Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingEmotions and Moral Behavior

The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality

Wai, Michael, Tiliopoulos, Niko·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Tiliopoulos, Niko
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
794-799
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124824556
Cited by
491
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
26.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
Dark Triad, psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, facial expression recognition, primary psychopathy, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review