Cited by 246Social and Intergroup PsychologyMental Health Treatment and AccessRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The Burden of Stigma on Health and Well-Being: A Taxonomy of Concealment, Course, Disruptiveness, Aesthetics, Origin, and Peril Across 93 Stigmas

Open access
Pachankis, John E., Hatzenbuehler, Mark L., Wang, Katie, Burton, Charles L., Crawford, Forrest W., Phelan, Jo C., Link, Bruce G.·2018·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Most individuals are stigmatized at some point. However, research often examines stigmas separately, thus underestimating the overall impact of stigma and precluding comparisons across stigmatized identities and conditions. In their classic text, Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships, Edward Jones and colleagues laid the groundwork for unifying the study of different stigmas by considering the shared dimensional features of stigmas: aesthetics, concealability, course, disruptiveness, origin, peril. Despite the prominence of this framework, no study has documented the extent to which stigmas differ along these dimensions, and the implications of this variation for health and well-being. We reinvigorated this framework to spur a comprehensive account of stigma’s impact by classifying 93 stigmas along these dimensions. With the input of expert and general public raters, we then located these stigmas in a six-dimensional space and created discrete clusters organized around these dimensions. Next, we linked this taxonomy to health and stigma-related mechanisms. This quantitative taxonomy offers parsimonious insights into the relationship among the numerous qualities of numerous stigmas and health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167217741313

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implicit and explicit bias against people with obesity is widespread among physicians, nurses, students, and nutritionists.

    “Implicit and explicit bias against people with obesity is widespread among physicians, nurses, students, and nutritionists,”

    From Effectiveness and safety of drugs for obesity (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The General Discussion (page unavailable) identifies obesity as a commonly endorsed stigmatized status, but that describes participants’ statuses, not bias among healthcare professionals. Searches for implicit and explicit obesity bias and for physicians, nurses, students, and nutritionists found no passage assessing its prevalence in those groups. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Crocker J Major B 1989 Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma Psychological Review 96 4 608 630
  2. Hebl MR Tickle J Heatherton TF 2000 Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals Heatherton TF Kleck RE Hebl MR Hull JG The Social Psychology of Stigma 275 306 New York Guilford Press
  3. Wheaton B 1994 Sampling the Stress Universe Avidson WR Gotlib IH Stress and Mental Health 77 114 Springer US

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pachankis, J. E., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Wang, K., Burton, C. L., Crawford, F. W., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Pachankis, John E.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2017-12-31
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
451-474
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2781876295
Cited by
246
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH109413, T32MH020031)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA032558)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP2HD091799)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
stigma, well-being, social stigma
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Healing, Social Stigma, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review