Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,632Team Dynamics and PerformanceSport Psychology and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?

Klimoski, Richard, Mohammed, Susan·1994·Journal of Management
DOI 10.1177/014920639402000206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There has been a recent resurgence of interest in group cognition in the field of organizational science. However, despite the apparent enthusiasm for the notion of the group mind in some modern guise, important conceptual work is needed to examine the concept critically. We attempt to do this in our treatment of the content, form, function, antecedents, and consequences of team mental models. In addition, we illustrate how the construct can bring explanatory power to theories of team performance and offer other implications for research and practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014920639402000206

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Axelrod, R. (1976). The structure of decision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. Pp. 413-484 in G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), 77rehandbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, 3rd ed..
  4. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. & Converse, S. A. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Human Factors Bulletin, 33: 1-4.
  5. Clark, N. K.& Stephenson, G. M. (1989). Group remembering. pp. 357-391 in P. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group inf7uence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Converse, S. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (1991). Shared mental models: A theory and some methodological issues. Pp. 1417-1421 in Proceedings of the human factors society: Thirty-fifth annual meeting.
  7. Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  8. 10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277657 · Paper page
  9. Dukerich, J. M. & Milliken, F. J. (1993). Insights into issue interpretation: The effect of issue characteristics on attention and interpretation processes. Working paper, University of Texas.
  10. 10.2307/258231 · doi:10.2307/258231 · Paper page
  11. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.
  12. 10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · Paper page
  13. Gioia, D. A. & Sims, H. P. (1986). Introduction: Social cognition in organizations. Pp. 1-19 in H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  14. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). A conceptual framework for a research program on groups as information processors. A technical report submitted to the Logistics and Human Factors Division, AF Human Resources Division, AF Human Resources Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
  15. Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. Pp. 193-218 in J. R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Tutorials in learning and memory. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  16. Kaplan, A. (1964). 77reconduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
  17. Kleinman, D. L. & Serfaty, D. (1989). Team performance assessment in distributed decision making. In R. Gilson, J., P. Kincaid & B. Goldiez (Eds.), Proceedings of the interactive networked simulation for training conference. Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
  18. Klimoski, R. & Jones, R. In press. Suppose we took staffing for effective group decision making seriously? In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  19. Kraiger, K. (1993). Further evidence of structural assessment as a valid measure for training evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, CA.
  20. Martin, D. (1993). Team think: Using the sport connection to develop, motivate, and manage a winning business team. New York: Penguin USA.
  21. McDougall, W. (1920). Group mind. New York: G. Putnam’s Sons.
  22. Orasanu, J. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision making, Technical Report No. 46. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory.
  23. Osigweh, C. A. B. (1989). Managing employee rights and responsibilities. New York: Quorum Booly.
  24. 10.5465/amr.1990.4308155 · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4308155 · Paper page
  25. Rasmussen, J. (1979). On the structure of knowledge-A morphology of mental models in a man-machine system context. Technical Report No. Riso-M-2192. Riso National Laboratory, Roskilda, Denmark.
  26. Rentsch, J. R., Heffner, T. S. & Duffy, L. T. (1993). Teamwork schema representations: The role of team experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
  27. Schmitt, N. W. & Klimoski, R. J. (1992). Research methods in human resource management. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Company.
  28. Schuler, R. & Harris, D. L. (1991). Determining quality improvement: Implications for human resources management as illustrated in a small company. Human Resources Planning, 12(3): 191-207.
  29. Shea, G. P. & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. Pp. 323-356 in K. M. Rowland & G. P. Ferris (Eds.). Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  30. Smircich, L. (1983). Organizations as shared meanings. Pp. 55-65 in L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
  31. Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. Pp. 48-67 in S. Worchel, W. Wood & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity. Newbury Park: Sage.
  32. 10.1037/0003-066X.34.3.214 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.3.214 · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.2.120 · Paper page
  34. Weick, K. E. & Bougon, M. G. (1986). Organizations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. Pp. 102-135 in H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organization social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  35. Wellens, A. R. (1993). Group situation awareness and distributed decision making: From military to civilian applications. Pp. 267-291 in N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  36. Young, R. M. (1983). Surrogates and mappings: Two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. Pp. 35-52 in D. Genter & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by

See all 1,632

Metadata

Authors
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Klimoski, Richard
ORCID
Klimoski, Richard
Venue
Journal of Management
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1994-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
403-437
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
DOI
10.1177/014920639402000206
OpenAlex
W2002052638
Cited by
1,632
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 98
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
team mental models, group cognition, group mind, team performance, organizational science, conceptual analysis, antecedents and consequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.