Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exosome-mediated amplification of endogenous brain repair mechanisms and brain and systemic organ interaction in modulating neurological outcome after stroke

Venkat, Poornima, Chen, Jieli, Chopp, Michael·2018·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is caused by a regional interruption of cerebral blood flow to the brain. Rigorous pre-clinical and clinical research has made landmark progress in stroke treatment using thrombolytics and endovascular thrombectomy. Although numerous successful neuroprotective therapeutic agents for ischemic stroke have been reported in pre-clinical studies, most of them failed in clinical testing. Persistent pre-clinical research has demonstrated that the ischemic brain is not only passively dying but is also actively recovering. Within the neurovascular niche in the peri-infarct tissue, repair mechanisms thrive on the interactions between the neural and vascular compartments. In this review, we discuss exogenous therapy using mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes to amplify endogenous brain repair mechanisms and to induce neurorestorative effects after stroke. Emerging evidence indicates that multiple communication axes between the various organs such as the brain, heart, kidney and gut, and whole body immune response mediated by the spleen can also affect stroke outcome. Therefore, in this review, we summarize this evidence and initiate a discussion on the potential to improve stroke outcome by amplifying multiple brain repair mechanisms after stroke, and by targeting peripheral organs and downstream events to enhance recovery in the injured brain and promote over all well being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0271678x18782789

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 143

  1. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3390/ijms161024895 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nm.2399 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1056/NEJM199512143332401 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1136/jnnp.48.1.7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00003-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0 · DOI
  9. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00382 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/ijms130911753 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s12975-016-0461-y · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s12975-016-0517-z · DOI
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0414-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000041283.53351.CB · DOI
  16. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014686 · DOI
  17. 10.1161/JAHA.117.005819 · DOI
  18. 10.1161/hs0901.094282 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/scrt159 · DOI
  20. 10.3727/096368912X658674 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.646224 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.33 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113972 · DOI
  24. 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00011 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00004647-200404000-00009 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/ana.10393 · DOI
  27. Hua T, 2007, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 28, 764
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0603512103 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.101034998 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600172 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.004 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0408258102 · DOI
  33. 10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.177 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.051 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/glia.22406 · DOI
  36. 10.1161/01.STR.25.1.202 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0165-5728(03)00134-6 · DOI
  38. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7268 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/emboj.2009.45 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00149 · DOI
  41. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-68 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nn.2334 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/brain/awr008 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s12017-009-8074-1 · DOI
  45. 10.1189/jlb.1109766 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659656 · DOI
  47. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034339 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.10.008 · DOI
  49. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00377 · DOI
  50. 10.2174/15680266113139990106 · DOI
  51. 10.2174/1567202614666171005153434 · DOI
  52. 10.1134/S1990747816020112 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nrd3978 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1177/0271678X17708917 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.152 · DOI
  56. 10.1517/14728214.2015.1061993 · DOI
  57. 10.1155/2016/5736059 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.007 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.08.036 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1002/stem.2575 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2002.00450.x · DOI
  63. 10.1161/01.RES.0000063425.51108.8D · DOI
  64. 10.1002/stem.1409 · DOI
  65. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015204 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/stem.1129 · DOI
  67. 10.5966/sctm.2015-0078 · DOI
  68. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163645 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/srep44433 · DOI
  70. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00231 · DOI
  71. 10.3390/ijms18071450 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/s12035-016-9851-0 · DOI
  73. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00182 · DOI
  74. 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.223 · DOI
  75. 10.3727/096368916X693031 · DOI
  76. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009854 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/emm.2017.63 · DOI
  78. 10.1089/scd.2013.0479 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/sctm.16-0363 · DOI
  80. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000206077.13705.6d · DOI
  81. 10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1307 · DOI
  82. 10.1007/s10157-012-0594-6 · DOI
  83. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.008 · DOI
  84. 10.1002/ar.21490 · DOI
  85. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011800 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.061 · DOI
  87. 10.1186/s12974-017-1038-8 · DOI
  88. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600217 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.02.002 · DOI
  90. 10.1111/jnc.13036 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.15252/emmm.201606271 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03368-1 · DOI
  93. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6523 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.03.017 · DOI
  95. 10.1002/jnr.21661 · DOI
  96. 10.1385/NMM:7:3:229 · DOI
  97. 10.1084/jem.20021098 · DOI
  98. 10.1186/1471-2377-11-110 · DOI
  99. 10.1186/s12883-016-0627-y · DOI
  100. 10.1055/s-2002-33033 · DOI
  101. 10.1002/stem.2600 · DOI
  102. Dames C, Winek K, Beckers Y, et al. Immunomodulatory treatment with systemic GM-CSF augments pulmonary immune responses and improves neurological outcome after experimental stroke. J Neuroimmunol . Epub ahead of print 9 March 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.03.005. · DOI
  103. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219563.87204.7d · DOI
  104. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678995 · DOI
  105. 10.1161/01.STR.15.6.990 · DOI
  106. 10.1002/ana.21459 · DOI
  107. 10.1161/01.STR.22.8.983 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.036 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70291-5 · DOI
  110. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000202684.29640.60 · DOI
  111. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.037531 · DOI
  112. 10.1161/01.STR.0000099964.34430.2D · DOI
  113. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311170 · DOI
  114. 10.1007/s12975-017-0520-z · DOI · Paper page
  115. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001714 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.001 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.090 · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1038/35013070 · DOI · Paper page
  119. 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90678-3 · DOI
  120. Schomig A, 1990, Circulation, 82, Ii13
  121. 10.1161/01.STR.17.3.387 · DOI
  122. 10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.WMP84 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1186/1471-2377-13-178 · DOI
  125. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.160 · DOI
  126. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.038 · DOI
  127. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e110 · DOI
  128. 10.2215/CJN.04110808 · DOI
  129. 10.1093/ndt/gfm591 · DOI
  130. Baud L, 1986, Am J Physiol, 251, F765
  131. 10.1681/ASN.2004050425 · DOI
  132. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.012 · DOI
  133. 10.1093/ndt/gfr015 · DOI
  134. 10.1038/nm.4068 · DOI · Paper page
  135. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1114-16.2016 · DOI
  136. 10.1038/nature12726 · DOI · Paper page
  137. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00392 · DOI · Paper page
  138. 10.18632/aging.100952 · DOI
  139. 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000262 · DOI
  140. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
  141. 10.1002/stem.544 · DOI
  142. 10.1164/rccm.201001-0010OC · DOI
  143. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00339 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 65

Metadata

Authors
Venkat, P., Chen, J., & Chopp, M.
Affiliations
Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
2165-2178
ISSN
  • 0271-678X
  • 1559-7016
Cited by
65
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exosome-mediated amplification of endogenous brain repair mechanisms and brain and systemic organ interaction in modulating neurological outcome after stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0271678x18782789
The paper
Venkat, P., Chen, J., & Chopp, M. (2018). Exosome-mediated amplification of endogenous brain repair mechanisms and brain and systemic organ interaction in modulating neurological outcome after stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x18782789