Cited by 829Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingChild and Animal Learning Development

Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure.

Wiebe, Sandra A., Espy, Kimberly Andrews, Charak, David·2008·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Although many tasks have been developed recently to study executive control in the preschool years, the constructs that underlie performance on these tasks are poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether executive control is composed of multiple, separable cognitive abilities (e.g., inhibition and working memory) or whether it is unitary in nature. A sample of 243 normally developing children between 2.3 and 6 years of age completed a battery of age-appropriate executive control tasks. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare multiple models of executive control empirically. A single-factor, general model was sufficient to account for the data. Furthermore, the fit of the unitary model was invariant across subgroups of children divided by socioeconomic status or sex. Girls displayed a higher level of latent executive control than boys, and children of higher and lower socioeconomic status did not differ in level. In typically developing preschool children, tasks conceptualized as indexes of working memory and inhibitory control in fact measured a single cognitive ability, despite surface differences between task characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some preschool factor analytic studies have revealed a single latent variable.

    “certain preschool executive function factor analytic studies have revealed a single latent variable”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Wiebe, Espy & Charak, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2008-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
575-587
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2109462020
Cited by
829
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 33
FWCI
27.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 MH065668; R01 DA014661; R01 HD050309; 5P01 HD038051)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
executive function, preschool children, latent structure, inhibition, working memory, socioeconomic status, sex differences, typically developing children, cognitive ability
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Reference Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Personal Construct Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review