Cited by 90Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaCognitive Abilities and Testing

Memory and executive functioning in 12‐year‐old children with a history of institutional rearing

Open access
Bick, Johanna, Zeanah, Charles H, Fox, Nathan A, Nelson, Charles A·2018·Child Development

Abstract

We examined visual recognition memory and executive functioning (spatial working memory [SWM], spatial planning, rule learning, and attention shifting) in 12-year-olds (n = 150) who participated in the Bucharest Early Intervention Project, a randomized controlled trial of foster care for institutionally reared children. Similar to prior reports at 8 years of age, institutionally reared children showed significant deficits in visual recognition memory and SWM. Deficits in attention shifting and rule learning were also apparent at this time point. These data suggest that early experiences continue to shape the development of memory, learning, and executive functioning processes in preadolescence, which may explain broader cognitive and learning difficulties commonly associated with severe early life neglect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12952

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bick, J., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., & Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Charles A
Venue
Child Development
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
495-508
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2756433854
Cited by
90
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
28.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Binder Family Foundation
  • NIMH (MH091363)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
institutional upbringing, visual recognition memory, spatial working memory, executive function, spatial planning, rule induction, attentional shift, foster care, Bucharest Early Intervention Project, preadolescents, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child Development, Child, Institutionalized, Female, Humans, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Romania, Space Perception, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Recognition, Psychology, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review