CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,748Face Recognition and PerceptionEmotion and Mood RecognitionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 444 of the 444 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Open access
Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Adolphs, Ralph, Marsella, Stacy, Martinez, Aleix M., Pollak, Seth D.·2019·Psychological Science in the Public Interest
DOI 10.1177/1529100619832930PMC PMC6640856
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions . This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view , and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1529100619832930

Cites

444 of 444 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–400 of 444

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2049 · DOI
  2. Baum S. (Creator) & Grazer B. (Producer). (2009, January 21). Lie to me [Television series]. Los Angeles, CA: Fox.
  3. Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G., Larsen J. H., Poehlmann K. M., Ito T. A. (2000). The psychophysiology of emotion. In Lewis R., Haviland-Jones J. M. (Eds.), The handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 173–191). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Camras L. A., Fatani S. S., Fraumeni B. R., Shuster M. M. (2016). The development of facial expressions. In Barrett L. F., Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp. 255–271). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  5. Cleese J. (Writer), Erskine J., Stewart D. (Directors). (2001, March 7). The human face [Television series]. London, England: BBC.
  6. Clore G. L., Ortony A. (2008). Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M., Barrett L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 628–642). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  7. Docter P., Del Carmen R. (Directors), LeFauve M., Cooley J. (Writers), & Lasseter J. (Producer). (2015). Inside out [Motion picture]. Emeryville, CA: Pixar.
  8. Dondi M., Gervasi M. T., Valente A., Vacca T., Bogana G., De Bellis I., . . . Oster H. (2012). Spontaneous facial expressions of distress in fetuses. In De Sousa C., Oliveira A. M.(Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Facial Expression: New Challenges for Research (pp. 16–18). Coimbra, Portugal: University of Coimbra.
  9. Duran J. I., Reisenzein R., Fernández-Dols J.-M. (2017). Coherence between emotions and facial expressions: A research synthesis. In Fernández-Dols J.-M., Russell J. A. (Eds.), The science of facial expression (pp. 107–129). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  10. Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. (1989). Human ethology (Wiessner-Larsen P., Heunemann A., Trans.). New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
  11. 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.268 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ekman P., Friesen W. V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  13. Ekman P., Friesen W. V., Hager J. C. (2002). Facial Action Coding System: The manual On CD ROM. Salt Lake City, UT: The Human Face.
  14. Feng D., Jeong D., Krämer N., Miller L., Marsella S. (2017). “Is it just me?” Evaluating attribution of negative feedback as a function of virtual instructor’s gender and proxemics. In Proceedings of AAMAS ‘16 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 810–818). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
  15. Granchrow J. R., Steiner J. E., Daher M. (1983). Neonatal facial expressions in response to different qualities and intensities of gustatory stimulation. Infant Behavior & Development, 6, 153–157.
  16. Izard C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  17. Keltner D., Cordaro D. T. (2017). Understanding multimodal emotional expressions: Recent advances in Basic Emotion Theory. In Fernández-Dols J.-M., Russell J. A. (Eds.), The science of facial expression (pp. 57–75). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  18. Lindquist K. A., Barrett L. F. (2008). Emotional complexity. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M., Barrett L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 513–530). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  19. Marsella S., Gratch J. (2016). Computational models of emotion as psychological tools. In Barrett L. F., Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp 113–132). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  20. Matsumoto D., Keltner D., Shiota M., O’Sullivan M., Frank M. (2008). Facial expressions of emotions. In Lewis M., Haviland-Jones J. M., Barrett L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 211–234). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  21. Oster H. (2005). The repertoire of infant facial expressions: An ontogenetic perspective. In Nadel J., Muir D. (Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 261–292). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  22. Pliskin A. (Associate Producer). (2015 January 15). Episode 4515 [Television series episode]. In Sesame street. New York New York: Sesame Workshop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y28GH2GoIyc
  23. 10.31234/osf.io/7vm5w · DOI
  24. Smith T. W. (2016). The book of human emotion. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
  25. Tinbergen N. (1953). The herring gull’s world. London, England: Collins.
  26. Valentine E. (Writer) & Lehmann B. (Producer). (2015 January 13). Episode 4517 [Television series episode]. In Sesame street. New York NY: Sesame Workshop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxfJicfyCdg
  27. Walker-Andrews A. S., Dickson L. R. (1997). Infants’ understanding of affect. In Hala S. (Ed.), Studies in developmental psychology: The development of social cognition (pp. 161–186). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.105 · DOI
  29. Yin Y. Nabian M. Ostadabbas S. Fan M. Chou C. Gendron M. (2018). Facial expression and peripheral physiology fusion to decode individualized affective experiences. ArXive.org. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07392v1 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,748

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett, Lisa Feldman
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Science in the Public Interest
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2019-07
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1-68
ISSN
  • 1529-1006 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-0031
DOI
10.1177/1529100619832930
PMC
PMC6640856
OpenAlex
W2912483755
Semantic Scholar
c489b6787c5af8aca97f4761343a66f3f189b35d
Cited by
1,748
References
444
Citations by year
2026: 238 · 2025: 266 · 2024: 230 · 2023: 302 · 2022: 269 · 2021: 227 · 2020: 186 · 2019: 26
FWCI
102.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2019-11-15)
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychological Science in the Public Interest (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113234, P50MH094258, R01MH109464, R01MH061285)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY020834)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA193632)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC014498)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD090256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
facial expressions, emotion recognition, facial motion, emotion categories, mixed emotions, social communication, emotion perception, anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review