The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deny, Distance, or Dismantle? How White Americans Manage a Privileged Identity
Open accessAbstract
Social scientists have traditionally argued that whiteness-the attribute of being recognized and treated as a White person in society-is powerful because it is invisible. On this view, members of the racially dominant group have the unique luxury of rarely noticing their race or the privileges it confers. This article challenges this "invisibility thesis," arguing that Whites frequently regard themselves as racial actors. We further argue that whiteness defines a problematic social identity that confronts Whites with 2 psychological threats: the possibility that their accomplishments in life were not fully earned (meritocratic threat) and the association with a group that benefits from unfair social advantages (group-image threat). We theorize that Whites manage their racial identity to dispel these threats. According to our deny, distance, or dismantle (3D) model of White identity management, dominant-group members have three strategies at their disposal: deny the existence of privilege, distance their own self-concepts from the White category, or strive to dismantle systems of privilege. Whereas denial and distancing promote insensitivity and inaction with respect to racial inequality, dismantling reduces threat by relinquishing privileges. We suggest that interventions aimed at reducing inequality should attempt to leverage dismantling as a strategy of White identity management.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“White youth are socialized into a society that rewards both whiteness and silence on whiteness—denial about, ignorance of, and self‐distancing from the racist status quo (Knowles et al., 2014; Spanierman & Cabrera, 2014).”
From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Knowles et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“This insight derives from classic work in attribution theory—in particular, Harold Kelley’s examination of the lay theories, or “schemata,” that embody people’s beliefs about how multiple causes produce an effect (Kelley, 1973).”
MethodWhite Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Spears, R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 · Cited by 1,826 · cited 1×
“Yet if the invisibility thesis is correct, then attempts to measure White identity in any of its possible senses—whether as a mental association between categories of the self and ingroup (Smith & Henry, 1996; Tropp & Wright, 2001), an emotional investment in the ingroup (Leach et al., 2008; Wohl, Branscombe, & Klar,…”
BackgroundWegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x · Cited by 1,245
Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one's group has done wrong or been wronged
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280600574815 · Cited by 339
Research works printed but not linked: 100
- Allport G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- 10.1177/0956797610384741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0011990 · DOI
- Baldwin J. A., 1965, Ebony, 20, 47
- Bennet L., 1965, Ebony, 20, 29
- 10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jesp.1996.0018 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1364 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01163.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.348 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520938755 · DOI
- 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ejsp.175 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.2001.1512 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0031017 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167212475224 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123401000102 · DOI
- Clark K. B., 1965, Ebony, 20, 69
- 10.1023/A:1022148418210 · DOI
- Deaux K., 1996, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 777
- Delgado R., 1997, Critical White studies: Looking behind the mirror
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Dyson M. E., 2000, I may not get there with you: The true Martin Luther King, Jr
- 10.1215/9780822381044-004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.669 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91 · DOI
- 10.1080/15298868.2011.556804 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00712.x · DOI
- Haney-López I., 1996, White by law: The legal construction of race
- Haney-López I., 2014, Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class
- 10.2307/1341787 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.403 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1268 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319 · DOI · Paper page
- Higgins E. T., 1996, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 133
- 10.1177/0146167202239047 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.893 · DOI
- Kelley H. H., 1987, Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior, 1
- 10.1080/15298868.2010.542015 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0013595 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223 · DOI
- Kozol J., 1991, Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools
- Lipsitz G., 1998, The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics
- 10.1037/a0024598 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167207303016 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167292183006 · DOI · Paper page
- Macrae C. N., 1996, Stereotypes and stereotyping
- 10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72 · DOI
- 10.1177/002200278102500401 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122322 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.511 · DOI
- McIntosh P., 2004, Race, class, and gender: An integrated study, 188
- 10.1037/h0076486 · DOI · Paper page
- Morris M. W., 2001, Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, 143
- 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.331 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.167 · DOI · Paper page
- Nagel T., 1986, The view from nowhere
- 10.1177/1745691611406922 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01810.x · DOI
- Oliver M. L., 1995, Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality
- 10.1215/9780822383659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167206287182 · DOI
- 10.1080/10478401003676501 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167204271713 · DOI
- 10.1111/0004-5608.00182 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Roediger D. R., 1991, The wages of whiteness: Race and the making of the American working class
- 10.1177/0146167207311200 · DOI
- Saguy T., 2009, Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities, 213
- 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00562.x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.378 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822381044-003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.805 · DOI
- 10.1080/10463280601095240 · DOI
- 10.1177/1368430209344869 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0032250 · DOI
- Sidanius J., 2000, Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America, 191
- 10.1177/106939719502900302 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167296226008 · DOI
- Smith E. R., 2008, Handbook of emotions, 428
- 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167299025004008 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167201275007 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610392926 · DOI
- Turner J. C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.259 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 · DOI
- Weber M., 2001, The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.635 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00440.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420250102 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jardina, A. E. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108645157 · Cited by 1,223
Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change
Brügger, A., Dessai, S., Devine-Wright, P., Morton, T., & Pidgeon, N. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2760 · Cited by 327
Mixed Signals: The Unintended Effects of Diversity Initiatives
Dover, T. L., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2019) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12059 · Cited by 349
Toward a Social Psychology of Race and Race Relations for the Twenty-First Century
Richeson, J. A., & Sommers, S. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115 · Cited by 243
Moving Beyond Implicit Bias Training: Policy Insights for Increasing Organizational Diversity
Onyeador, I. N., Hudson, S. T. J., & Lewis, N. A. (2021) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732220983840 · Cited by 272
“Some practitioners prefer to focus on implicit and unconscious biases because, for instance, White people are often defensive about allegations of racism (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundIyer, A. (2022) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12666 · Cited by 192
Knowles, E. D., & Tropp, L. R. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618759326 · Cited by 142
“White identification was regressed on neighborhood diversity, reflecting the positive association between exposure to non-Whites and identification with Whites (Knowles et al., 2014; Knowles & Peng, 2005).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationToward an understanding of structural racism: Implications for criminal justice
Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj7779 · Cited by 135
Herd Invisibility: The Psychology of Racial Privilege
Phillips, L. T., & Lowery, B. S. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417753600 · Cited by 124
“General strategies to deny and to distance from privilege have been reviewed elsewhere, as has the role of maintenance motives in driving many of these behaviors (Knowles et al., 2014; Leach et al., 2002; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrannon, T. N., Carter, E. R., Murdock‐Perriera, L. A., & Higginbotham, G. D. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12040 · Cited by 122
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81
“White youth are socialized into a society that rewards both whiteness and silence on whiteness—denial about, ignorance of, and self-distancing from the racist status quo (Knowles et al., 2014; Spanierman & Cabrera, 2014).”
BackgroundRoles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity and teacher beliefs in academic grading
Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12541 · Cited by 108
Do Children Distinguish Between Resource Inequalities With Individual Versus Structural Origins?
Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., & Vanderbilt, K. E. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13181 · Cited by 102
Moving beyond social categories by incorporating context in social psychological theory
Cikara, M., Martinez, J. E., & Lewis, N. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00079-3 · Cited by 114
“The initial encounter with an environment’s constraints (such as imposed categorization rules and associated consequences) can start a cascade of psychological processes, including changes in belongingness and identification 117,118 .”
Tropp, L. R., & Barlow, F. K. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417743282 · Cited by 109
“…range from not seeing the impact of race in their own lived experience (McDermott & Samson, 2005) to feeling threatened and motivated to preserve their own privileged position in a multiracial society (Knowles et al., 2014; Sidanius, Cotterill, Sheehy-Skeffington, Kteily, & Carvacho, 2016).”
BackgroundIntergroup contact and social change: An integrated Contact‐Collective Action Model
Hässler, T., Uluğ, Ö., Kappmeier, M., & Travaglino, G. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n3xby · Cited by 77
I ain't no fortunate one: On the motivated denial of class privilege.
Phillips, L. T., & Lowery, B. S. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000240.supp · Cited by 75
“For instance, recent work has described meritocratic threat as a threat to self-regard: to claim positive self-regard, people in meritocratic contexts need to attribute outcomes to themselves (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationShuman, E., Saguy, T., van Zomeren, M., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rvgup · Cited by 74
“…in apathy and a passive lack of support for policies that would address inequality (e.g., the principle-implentation gap; Dixon et al., 2017), whereas other strategies involve active denial of inequality and defense of the hierarchy (for a review see, Knowles et al., 2014; Lowery et al., 2006).”
BackgroundWillingness to engage in intergroup contact: A multilevel approach.
Ron, Y., Solomon, J., Halperin, E., & Saguy, T. (2017) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1037/pac0000204 · Cited by 78
“Indeed, research on advantaged group members has indicated tendencies to deny privilege, distance oneself from it, or endorse beliefs that legitimize existing inequality (Knowles et al., 2014; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999).”
BackgroundSocial creativity: Reviving a social identity approach to social stability
van Bezouw, M. J., van der Toorn, J., & Becker, J. C. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2732 · Cited by 82
Onyeador, I. N., Daumeyer, N. M., Rucker, J. M., Duker, A., Kraus, M. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220942625 · Cited by 102
Freedom of racist speech: Ego and expressive threats.
White, M., & Crandall, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000095 · Cited by 84
Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change
Craig, M. A., Badaan, V., & Brown, R. M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002 · Cited by 67
Abaied, J. L., Perry, S., Cheaito, A., & Ramirez, V. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12767 · Cited by 65
“These findings are consistent with extant theory and research demonstrating that, for many White people, race is not a central feature of their identity (Helms, 2003; Knowles et al., 2014).”
ResultNeed satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change.
Häßler, T., Ullrich, J., Sebben, S., Shnabel, N., Bernardino, M., Valdenegro, D., van Laar, C., González, R., Visintin, E. P., Tropp, L. R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000365 · Cited by 70
The political is personal: The costs of daily politics.Preprint
Ford, B., Feinberg, M., Thai, S., Gatchpazian, A., & Lassetter, B. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hdz97 · Cited by 54
“…and although many often-used forms can be demotivating for taking action (e.g., reframing the situation as less severe or as out of one ’ s hands; Knowles et al., 2014), other forms may be less demotivating (e.g., reframing the situation as an opportunity to gain ef fi cacy, or to cultivate a…”
BackgroundHolt, L. F., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1524788 · Cited by 59
Teixeira, C. P., Spears, R., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000195 · Cited by 106
White fear, dehumanization, and low empathy: Lethal combinations for shooting biases.
Mekawi, Y., Bresin, K., & Hunter, C. D. (2015) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/cdp0000067 · Cited by 52
Uluğ, Ö. M., & Tropp, L. R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12731 · Cited by 54
“…make it more challenging for members of advantaged racial groups to deny that such differential treatment exists (Wilkins & Kaiser, 2014; see also Knowles et al., 2014), or to presume that members of disadvantaged racial groups are somehow exaggerating or inaccurately reporting on such…”
BackgroundMANdatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress
van Laar, C., Rossum, A. V., Kosakowska‐Berezecka, N., Bongiorno, R., & Block, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1263313 · Cited by 71
“…political battles in societies on gender, socioeconomic status and immigration - where privileged high-status groups may focus on their own victimhood (see also Norton and Sommers, 2011; Knowles et al., 2014; Esteve et al., 2016; West, 2016; Williams, 2017; Does et al., 2018; West et al., 2021).”
BackgroundHow Microaggressions Reinforce and Perpetuate Systemic Racism in the United States
Skinner, A. L., Sarmal, A., Andre, C. J., & Rogbeer, K. G. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211002543 · Cited by 70
“, affirmative action) designed to challenge systemic discrimination because such policies are perceived to taint the selection process, such that it is no longer based solely on merit (Knowles et al., 2014; Lawton, 2000).”
BackgroundTropp, L. R., Uluğ, Ö. M., & Uysal, M. S. (2020) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.10.012 · Cited by 50
Undergraduates’ awareness of White and male privilege in STEM
Dancy, M., Rainey, K. D., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., & Möller, S. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3 · Cited by 74
How well-intentioned white male physicists maintain ignorance of inequity and justify inaction
Dancy, M., & Hodari, A. K. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00433-8 · Cited by 57
“Many others have identified similar patterns (Daniels, 2021; Finders & Kwame-Ross, 2020; Hytten & Warren, 2003; Knowles et al., 2014; Matias, 2016).”
BackgroundResultCallaghan, B., Harouni, L., Dupree, C. H., Kraus, M. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108875118 · Cited by 54
Knowles, E. D., Tropp, L., & Mogami, M. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211030009 · Cited by 38
“It may be possible to blunt the threat of lost privilege, for instance, by encouraging White people to regard their group’s status as unearned and bad for its moral reputation (Knowles et al., 2014; Lowery et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCollective existential threat mediates White population decline’s effect on defensive reactions
Bai, H., & Federico, C. M. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430219839763 · Cited by 38
Hegemonic whiteness: Expanding and operationalizing the conceptual framework
Miller, P. K. (2022) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12973 · Cited by 50
Relational Reconciliation: Socializing Others across Demographic Differences
Lakshmi Ramarajan, B., & Reid, E. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0506 · Cited by 46
Change, Challenge, and Prospects for a Diversity Paradigm in Social Psychology
Jones, J. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12039 · Cited by 46
Interrogating Whiteness in Community Research and Action
Coleman, B. R., Collins, C. R., & Bonam, C. M. (2020) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12473 · Cited by 42
A framework for understanding effective allyship
Pietri, E. S., Moser, C. E., Derricks, V. S., & Johnson, I. R. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00359-0 · Cited by 47
“Luckily, working to dismantle systems that afford privilege — such as allyship — is an effective coping mechanism to combat uncom-fortable feelings regarding unearned privilege 81,172,173 .”
Psychology must grapple with Whiteness
Remedios, J. D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00024-4 · Cited by 44
Personal relative deprivation and the belief that economic success is zero-sum.
Ongis, M., & Davidai, S. (2021) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0001144 · Cited by 32
“Just as admitting one ’ s racial privilege fosters willingness to challenge the status quo (e.g., Knowles et al., 2014), acknowledging how economic advantages can negatively affect worse-off others may foster support for policies that reduce economic disparities.”
BackgroundDefend, Deny, Distance, and Dismantle: A New Measure of Advantaged Identity Management
Shuman, E., van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., Knowles, E. D., & Halperin, E. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231216769 · Cited by 49
Self-citationRacial Inequality in Organizations: A Systems Psychodynamic Perspective
Mobasseri, S., Kahn, W. A., & Ely, R. J. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0446 · Cited by 45
“position it occupies in society’s power-status hierarchy (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialBey, G., Ulbricht, C. M., & Person, S. D. (2018) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-018-0507-9 · Cited by 43
Vezzali, L., Andrighetto, L., Capozza, D., Bernardo, G. A. D., & Saguy, T. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/jts5.12 · Cited by 28
Verkuyten, M., & Martinović, B. (2015) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0248-4 · Cited by 32
“For example, majority members tend to be aware of their privileged identity status (Knowles et al., 2014), attribute more positive self-defining characteristics to their in-group, and can consider their in-group culture as providing the self-evident and invariant standard for judgment.”
Cooley, E., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Cottrell, D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103885 · Cited by 29
Advancing research and practice of psychological intergroup interventions
Čehajić‐Clancy, S., & Halperin, E. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00330-z · Cited by 30
In Good Company: When Gender Diversity Boosts a Company’s Reputation
Wilton, L. S., Sanchez, D. T., Unzueta, M. M., Kaiser, C. R., & Caluori, N. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318800264 · Cited by 34
“White individuals do not support diversity policies when they believe that these policies will harm ingroup members (Knowles et al., 2014) or when the diversity policy is construed as targeting or excluding individuals on the basis of social identity (Collins, 2011a, 2011b; Kravitz et al., 1997;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationShuman, E., Johnson, D. R., Saguy, T., & Halperin, E. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218768800 · Cited by 32
“For example, denying the existence of the transgression or internally rationalizing it does little to repair the image of the group in the eyes of others (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundIgnorance of History and Political Differences in Perception of Racism in the United States
Zell, E., & Lesick, T. L. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211056493 · Cited by 33
“Consistent with the identity relevance explanation (Doosje et al., 1998; Knowles et al., 2014; Phillips & Lowery, 2018), White Republicans may identify more strongly with their racial group than White Democrats, which may exacerbate the denial of racism.”
BackgroundMarshburn, C. K., Folberg, A. M., Crittle, C. S., & Maddox, K. B. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220981417 · Cited by 37
“When the goal is self-interest (e.g., wanting to be liked) or to regulate self-focused emotions (e.g., guilt), the feelings of White allies and perpetrators are prioritized more than those of Blacks harmed by racism (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundIgnorance of critical race theory predicts White Americans’ opposition to it
Richmond, B. S., Toosi, N. R., Wellman, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2024) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12601 · Cited by 27
“…problem illustrates the effects of racial ignorance (Bonam et al., 2019; Nelson et al., 2013), while a focus on anticipated harm to White people echoes previous research on White racial identity threat curtailing efforts for equality (Chow et al., 2013; Knowles et al., 2014; Lowery et al., 2006).”
BackgroundWhy benefiting from discrimination is less recognized as discrimination.
Phillips, L. T., & Jun, S. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000298 · Cited by 26
“Speci fi cally, group inequity can be described as a dis advantage for those who suffer from the inequity, or as an ad vantage for those who bene fi t from the same inequity (Branscombe, 1998; Chow et al., 2008; Knowles et al., 2014; Lowery et al., 2012; Rosette & Koval, 2018).”
BackgroundMarshburn, C. K., & Campos, B. (2021) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984211034961 · Cited by 28
“White people’s anxieties during cross-race interactions stem from inexperience, a fear of being labeled racist, and a desire to protect their selfesteem against knowledge of systematic unfair racial advantage (Knowles et al., 2014; Toosi et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLee, C., Gligorić, K., Kalluri, P., Harrington, M., Durmus, E., Sanchez, K. L., San, N., Tse, D., Zhao, X., Hamedani, M. G., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322764121 · Cited by 26
Perceptions of White Women’s Stigma-Based Solidarity Claims and Disingenuous Allyship
Chaney, K. E., Cipollina, R., & Sanchez, D. T. (2023) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231188757 · Cited by 26
“Furthermore, White women generally hold higher societal power than Black Americans due to racial privilege (Case, 2012; Knowles et al., 2014; McIntosh, 2018) and have historically excluded Black Americans from efforts toward gender equality (Roth, 2004).”
BackgroundDominant groups support digressive victimhood claims to counter accusations of discrimination
Danbold, F., Onyeador, I. N., & Unzueta, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104233 · Cited by 32
“In response, they may deny their relative advantage (Knowles, Lowery, Chow, & Unzueta, 2014; SimanTov-Nachlieli & Shnabel, 2014) or dismiss charges of discrimination as illegitimate (Teixeira, Spears, & Yzerbyt, 2020).”
Self-citationOnyeador, I. N., Mobasseri, S., McKinney, H., & Martin, A. E. (2024) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2023.0230 · Cited by 29
The “gay agenda:” How the myth of gay affluence impedes the progress toward equality
Bettinsoli, M. L., Napier, J. L., & Carnaghi, A. (2021) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2762 · Cited by 26
Starck, J. G., Hurd, K., Perez, M. J., & Marshburn, C. K. (2024) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12606 · Cited by 33
Ehrke, F., Ashoee, A., Steffens, M. C., & Louvet, E. (2020) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12665 · Cited by 38
“In this context, McIntosh (2012) emphasised that “we all have both privilege and disadvantage” (p. 203), implying that people enjoy privilege due to some of their group memberships (e.g., White), and disadvantage due to others (e.g., woman). Regarding the relationship between privilege awareness and intergroup attitud…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntergroup Inequality Heightens Reports of Discrimination Along Alternative Identity Dimensions
Brown, R. M., & Craig, M. A. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219880186 · Cited by 26
Kteily, N., & Richeson, J. A. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1215212 · Cited by 37
“…Kteily et al., 2013; Phillips & Lowery, 2015; Saguy & Kteily, 2014), as well as adopting ideologies (e.g., meritocracy), social policies (e.g., support for minimum wage), and stereotypes (e.g., of outgroups as incompetent, lazy or aggressive) that rationalize their advantage (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundKnowlton, K. K., Carton, A. M., & Grant, A. M. (2022) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100180 · Cited by 25
“My Aim Is True”: An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity
Moser, C. E., & Wiley, S. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241273354 · Cited by 28
Racial equity in social psychological science: A guide for scholars, institutions, and the field
Torrez, B., Hudson, S. T. J., & Dupree, C. H. (2022) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12720 · Cited by 25
‘Blockchain for good’: Exploring the notion of social good inside the blockchain scene
Semenzin, S. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231205479 · Cited by 30
“Research in the fi eld of social psychology has shown that those higher up in the social hierarchy are particularly inclined to embrace the ideology of meritocracy (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundAmericans Misperceive Racial Disparities in Economic Mobility
Davidai, S., & Walker, J. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211024115 · Cited by 28
Psychologising meritocracy: A historical account of its many guises
Trevisan, F., Rusconi, P., Hanna, P., & Hegarty, P. V. (2021) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593543211057098 · Cited by 31
Phillips, L. T., Kreps, T. A., & Chugh, D. (2024) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104333 · Cited by 20
Talaifar, S., Buhrmester, M. D., Ayduk, Ö. N., & Swann, W. B. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620958003 · Cited by 25
Weiss‐Klayman, N., Hameiri, B., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12651 · Cited by 23
Scale dichotomization reduces customer racial discrimination and income inequality
Botelho, T. L., Jun, S., Humes, D., & DeCelles, K. A. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08599-7 · Cited by 17
Allidina, S., & Cunningham, W. A. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231172255 · Cited by 28
“Members of dominant groups can react in a variety of ways to their privilege, such as by denying the existence of their privilege, distancing themselves from the privileged group, or working to dismantle systems of oppres-sion (Knowles et al., 2014; Leach et al., 2009).”
Greenland, K., West, K., & van Laar, C. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12902 · Cited by 17
Vollhardt, J. R., Ünal, H., & Nair, R. (2022) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12554 · Cited by 19
An Integrative Model for the Development of Anti-Racist Behavior in White Adolescents
Woolverton, G. A., & Marks, A. K. (2022) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/07435584221091492 · Cited by 18
“White adolescents who hold color-blind views may also not identify as racial or may distance themselves from being white (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRace, politics, and perceptions of anti-Black and anti-White discrimination over time
Peacock, N., & Biernat, M. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211040107 · Cited by 17
“Pointing out White privilege threatens meritocratic beliefs and groupbased morality, and denying that one has racial privilege is one of the strategies White people use to dispel those threats (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundTyler, K. M., Stevens-Watkins, D. J., Burris, J. L., Fisher, S. D., & Hargons, C. N. (2021) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984211034948 · Cited by 18
“White privilege is granted without recognition or permission and exists even when White people seek to deny, distance, or dis-identify with being White (Leonardo, 2009; Knowles et al., 2014; Phillips & Lowery, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialDerricks, V. S., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2021) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843211005447 · Cited by 31
“, 1999) or on long-standing differences in social privilege and disadvantage that favor Whites (Knowles et al., 2014; Unzueta & Lowery, 2008).”
BackgroundHigh power mindsets reduce gender identification and benevolent sexism among women (But not men)
Vial, A. C., & Napier, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.012 · Cited by 20
Wiley, S., Park, J. W., & Catalina, N. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231162042 · Cited by 15
“Existing research and theory also demonstrate that advantaged group members employ privilege denial as a strategy to defend against threats to their (moral) reputation and self-worth (Knowles et al., 2014; Phillips & Lowery, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialDover, T. L. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211018741 · Cited by 20
“Several research programs have demonstrated that members of privileged groups are averse to thinking about their unearned advantages (Branscombe, 1998; Knowles et al., 2014; Powell et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialWalker, J., & Gilovich, T. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000256 · Cited by 15
Color‐Blind and Multicultural Strategies in Medical Settings
West, T. V., & Schoenthaler, A. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12029 · Cited by 17
European Americans' intentions to confront racial bias: Considering who, what (kind), and why
Brown, R. M., Craig, M. A., & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104123 · Cited by 16
Kteily, N., & McClanahan, K. J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.030 · Cited by 23
Marshburn, C. K., & Knowles, E. D. (2017) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430216681178 · Cited by 9
“Although a form of identity distancing (Knowles et al., 2014), this process entails altering one’s explicit beliefs about ingroup identity and is distinct from thought suppression.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerceptions of the social status hierarchy and its cultural and economic sources
Breyer, M. (2024) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12712 · Cited by 14
“It is not surprising that high-status groups agree with or at least acknowledge the sources of the current status hierarchy, even though this acknowledgement can also motivate them to deny or distance themselves from profiting from inequality (Knowles et al., 2014).”
Wilton, L. S., Sullivan, J. L., Albuja, A. F., & Perry, S. (2023) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12098 · Cited by 16
Vine, M., & Greenwood, R. M. (2021) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12563 · Cited by 12
“At the same time, use of such strategies may also block transformational solidarity work that requires honest conversations about power asymmetries (Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHeterosexual Identity Management: How Social Context Affects Heterosexual Marking Practices
Davis‐Delano, L. R., & Morgan, E. M. (2016) · Identity · doi:10.1080/15283488.2016.1229611 · Cited by 15
“Thus, we are able to illustrate through our findings that an unequal social context can affect not only subordinate identity management practices but also dominant identity management practices (e.g., Knowles et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMosley, A. J., Biernat, M., & Adams, G. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104487 · Cited by 17
Preston, M. C. (2025) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2023.1421 · Cited by 15
Diversity Discourse as Racialized and Double-edged: Findings from a National Survey
Rajasekar, N., Aguilar-Champeau, M., & Hartmann, D. (2022) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/23326492221078303 · Cited by 14
“…racial inequality, and opinions about racebased policy; findings often show that racial attitudes and racial identity are associated with how participants respond to different items about diversity (e.g., Bauman, Trawalter, and Unzueta 2014; Knowles et al. 2014; Unzueta, Knowles, and Ho 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M., & Unzueta, M. M.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 594-609
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2144841272
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- whiteness, White Americans, privilege, denial, distancing, dismantling, racial inequality, anti-racism interventions, dominant group members
- MeSH terms
- Awareness, Humans, Models, Psychological, Race Relations, Self Concept, Social Identification, United States, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review