Cited by 452Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Elevated cerebrospinal fluid and blood concentrations of oxytocin following its intranasal administration in humans

Open access
Striepens, Nadine, Kendrick, Keith M., Hanking, Vanessa, Landgraf, Rainer, Wüllner, Ullrich, Maier, Wolfgang, Hurlemann, René·2013·Scientific Reports

Abstract

There has been an unprecedented interest in the modulatory effects of intranasal oxytocin on human social cognition and behaviour, however as yet no study has actually demonstrated that this modality of administration increases concentrations of the peptide in the brain as well as blood in humans. Here using combined blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling in subjects receiving either 24 IU of oxytocin (n = 11) or placebo (n = 4) we have shown that oxytocin levels significantly increased in both plasma and CSF. However, whereas oxytocin plasma concentrations peaked at 15 min after intranasal administration and decreased after 75 min, CSF concentrations took up to 75 min to reach a significant level. Moreover, there was no correlation (r = <0.10) between oxytocin plasma and CSF concentrations. Together, these data provide crucial insights into the plasma and CSF kinetics of intranasally administered oxytocin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep03440

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one study has studied the exact pharmacokinetics of intranasal oxytocin; it showed an elevation of CSF oxytocin 75 minutes after intranasal administration.

    “only one study [23] has studied its exact pharmacokinetics. This study showed an elevation of CSF OT occurs 75 minutes after intranasal administration (whereas most of the behavioral tasks in the literature take place 45 minutes post-administration).”

    From Failed Replication of Oxytocin Effects on Trust: The Envelope Task Case (2015) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results report significantly elevated CSF oxytocin 75 minutes after intranasal administration, and the Discussion describes this as the first study to show increased human CSF concentrations. The broader claim that only one study had examined the exact pharmacokinetics is not supported: the paper cites earlier studies of plasma concentrations and says the precise duration of elevated CSF concentrations remains unknown. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four studies raised oxytocin concentrations above 20 pg/ml from basal levels below 5 pg/ml; Dal Monte et al. reported a rise to 80 pg/ml after nasal spray but no significant rise with a nebuliser, and Modi et al. reported a 100-fold plasma increase in macaques to more than 300 pg/ml and a rise to about 60 pg/ml after nebuliser application.

    “Of the above-mentioned studies, four (20,22,24,25) achieved oxytocin concentrations in excess of 20pg/ml from basal levels of <5pg/ml, while Dal Monte et al. reported a rise to 80pg/ml after nasal spray, but no significant rise with a nebulariser (23).Modi et al. reported a 100-fold increase in plasma in the macaque (to >300pg/ml), and a rise to ~60pg/ml (from 10pg/ml) after nebulariser”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [20]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A study by Heinrichs and colleagues suggested that oxytocin may have anxiolytic properties in humans.

    “As a study by Heinrichs and colleagues suggested that OT may also have anxiolytic proprieties in humans (25)”

    From Is there a Publication Bias in Behavioural Intranasal Oxytocin Research on Humans? Opening the File Drawer of One Laboratory (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) discusses potential benefits of intranasal oxytocin for conditions including social anxiety, which is consistent with a tentative anxiolytic effect in humans. But the paper reports changes in cerebrospinal fluid and blood oxytocin concentrations, not anxiety outcomes, and our copy does not identify a Heinrichs-led study making this finding. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 11 patients given 24 IU intranasal oxytocin, Striepens et al. observed no CSF increase at 45 or 60 minutes, although three patients sampled at 75 minutes had CSF oxytocin 64% above controls.

    “Striepens et al. (20) measured CSF oxytocin in 11 patients given 24IU oxytocin intranasally.Whereas Born et al. saw an increase after 10min (albeit with vasopressin, at a larger dose) (17), Striepens et al. saw no increase at 45 or 60min.However, three patients sampled at 75min had CSF levels 64% higher than controls (at ~30pg/ml).”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Recent findings have demonstrated that intranasal oxytocin increases oxytocin concentration in cerebrospinal fluid in both humans and animals.

    “Recent findings have demonstrated that IN-OT increases OT concentration in CSF in both human (25) and animal (38,39).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M. B., Spitzer R. L., Gibbon M. & Williams J. B. W. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-patient Edition, SCID-I/NP. (Biometrics Research Dept., New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Striepens, N., Kendrick, K. M., Hanking, V., Landgraf, R., Wüllner, U., Maier, W., & Hurlemann, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Corresponding author
Hurlemann, René
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2013-12-06
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
3440-3440
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115046242
Cited by
452
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 34
FWCI
61.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91132720)
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, intranasal administration, cerebrospinal fluid, plasma concentration, social cognition
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxytocin, Radioimmunoassay, Time Factors, Drug Monitoring, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review