Cited by 73Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The other side of the coin: oxytocin decreases the adherence to fairness norms

Open access
Radke, Sina, de Bruijn, Ellen R. A.·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Oxytocin (OXT) has been implicated in prosocial behaviors such as trust and generosity. Yet, these effects appear to strongly depend on characteristics of the situation and the people with whom we interact or make decisions. Norms and rules can facilitate and guide our actions, with fairness being a particularly salient and fundamental norm. The current study investigated the effects of intranasal OXT administration on fairness considerations in social decision-making in a double-blind, placebo-controlled within-subject design. After having received 24 IU of OXT or placebo (PLC), participants completed a one-shot Dictator Game (DG) and played the role of the responder in a modified version of the Ultimatum Game (UG), in which an unfair offer of eight coins for the proposer and two coins for the responder is paired with either a fair-(5:5) or no-alternative (8:2). Rejection rates were higher when a fair alternative had been available than when there was no alternative to an unfair offer. Importantly, OXT did not de-or increase rejection rates overall, but reduced the sensitivity to contextual fairness, i.e., the context of alternatives in which an offer was made. As dictators, participants allocated less coins to the recipient when given OXT than when given PLC, indicating a decline in generosity. These results suggest that OXT decreases the adherence to fairness norms in social settings where others are likely to be perceived as not belonging to one's ingroup. While our findings do not support the prosocial conception of OXT, they corroborate recent ideas that the effects of OXT are more nuanced than assumed in the past.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00193

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with a placebo, participants given oxytocin were less sensitive to cues that stimulated perspective taking of an anonymous partner in an interactive economic game.

    “Compared with a placebo, participants given OT were less sensitive to cues that stimulated perspective taking of an anonymous partner in an interactive economic game (Radke and de Bruijn, 2012).”
  • Oxytocin has been implicated in many social behaviors, from promoting trust, generosity and cooperation to aggravating mistrust and aggressive behavior.

    “Oxytocin has been implicated in many social behaviors, from promoting trust, generosity and cooperation 21,22,46,47 to aggravating mistrust and aggressive behavior 48,49 .”
  • OXT has been emphasized as an important regulator of fairness, trust, cooperation, and competition in humans.

    “OXT has been emphasized as an important regulator of fairness, trust, cooperation, and competition in humans (De Dreu, 2012; Kosfeld, Heinrichs, Zak, Fischbacher, & Fehr, 2005; Radke & De Bruijn, 2012; Zak, Stanton, & Ahmadi, 2007).”
  • The enhancement of prosociality by OXT is not universal; OXT reduces sensitivity to fairness based on perspective-taking and generosity, and reduces conformity to 'social norms'.

    “the enhancement of prosociality by OXT is not universal, as other work has shown that OXT reduces sensitivity to fairness based on perspective-taking and generosity, and more generally, OXT reduces conformity to ‘social norms’ (Radke & De Bruijn, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radke, S., & de Bruijn, E. R. A.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Radke, Sina
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
193-193
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119397947
Cited by
73
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (036.011.867, 451-07-022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
oxytocin, fairness norms, social decision-making, dictator game, ultimatum game, rejection of unfair offers, generosity, prosocial behavior, intranasal administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review