Cited by 890Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Future of Intervention Science: Process-Based Therapy

Open access
Hofmann, Stefan G., Hayes, Steven C.·2019·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Clinical science seems to have reached a tipping point. It appears that a new paradigm is beginning to emerge that is questioning the validity and utility of the medical illness model, which assumes that latent disease entities are targeted with specific therapy protocols. A new generation of evidence-based care has begun to move toward process-based therapies to target core mediators and moderators based on testable theories. This could represent a paradigm shift in clinical science with far-reaching implications. Clinical science might see a decline of named therapies defined by set technologies, a decline of broad schools, a rise of testable models, a rise of mediation and moderation studies, the emergence of new forms of diagnosis based on functional analysis, a move from nomothetic to idiographic approaches, and a move toward processes that specify modifiable elements. These changes could integrate or bridge different treatment orientations, settings, and even cultures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702618772296

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hayes S. C., Hofmann S. G. (Eds.). (2018). Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
  2. 10.1177/0145445503253829 · DOI
  3. Wilson D. S., Hayes S. C. (Eds.). (2018). Evolution and contextual behavioral science: An integrated framework for understanding, predicting, and influencing human behavior. Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.
  4. Zettle R. D., Hayes S. C., Barnes-Holmes D., Biglan T. (2016). (Eds.). The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. Chichester, UK: Wiley/Blackwell.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2018-05-29
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
37-50
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2807203549
Cited by
888
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 145 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 13
FWCI
72.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099021, R34MH099311, U01MH108168)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
process-based therapy, intervention research, evidence-based care, mediating and moderating effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review