Cited by 72Protist diversity and phylogenyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

A late origin of the extant eukaryotic diversity: divergence time estimates using rare genomic changes

Open access
Chernikova, Diana, Motamedi, Sam, Csürös, Miklós, Koonin, Eugene V, Rogozin, Igor B·2011·Biology Direct

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of the divergence time of the extant eukaryotes is a fundamentally important but extremely difficult problem owing primarily to gross violations of the molecular clock at long evolutionary distances and the lack of appropriate calibration points close to the date of interest. These difficulties are intrinsic to the dating of ancient divergence events and are reflected in the large discrepancies between estimates obtained with different approaches. Estimates of the age of Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA) vary approximately twofold, from ~1,100 million years ago (Mya) to ~2,300 Mya. Results: We applied the genome-wide analysis of rare genomic changes associated with conserved amino acids (RGC_CAs) and used several independent techniques to obtain date estimates for the divergence of the major lineages of eukaryotes with calibration intervals for insects, land plants and vertebrates. The results suggest an early divergence of monocot and dicot plants, approximately 340 Mya, raising the possibility of plant-insect coevolution. The divergence of bilaterian animal phyla is estimated at ~400-700 Mya, a range of dates that is consistent with cladogenesis immediately preceding the Cambrian explosion. The origin of opisthokonts (the supergroup of eukaryotes that includes metazoa and fungi) is estimated at ~700-1,000 Mya, and the age of LECA at ~1,000-1,300 Mya. We separately analyzed the red algal calibration interval which is based on single fossil. This analysis produced time estimates that were systematically older compared to the other estimates. Nevertheless, the majority of the estimates for the age of the LECA using the red algal data fell within the 1,200-1,400 Mya interval. Conclusion: The inference of a "young LECA" is compatible with the latest of previously estimated dates and has substantial biological implications. If these estimates are valid, the approximately 1 to 1.4 billion years of evolution of eukaryotes that is open to comparative-genomic study probably was preceded by hundreds of millions years of evolution that might have included extinct diversity inaccessible to comparative approaches. Reviewers: This article was reviewed by William Martin, Herve Philippe (nominated by I. King Jordan), and Romain Derelle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6150-6-26

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LECA estimate from the species tree analysis falls within published molecular clock estimates, placing LECA within a broad interval of approximately 1-2.4 Ga.

    “The LECA estimate (1.93–1.84 Ga, 95% highest posterior density) from our species tree analysis falls within published molecular clock estimates, placing LECA within a broad interval ~1–2.4 Ga25–27,97–99 (Fig. 5A, C, Supplementary Fig. 16, Supplementary Data 10).”

    From ATP synthase evolution on a cross-braced dated tree of life (2023) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the paper's LECA estimate of about 1.1–1.2 Ga agrees with previous relaxed molecular-clock estimates. It does not establish a published interval of approximately 1–2.4 Ga; instead, it says its estimate is clearly inconsistent with an older molecular-clock estimate of about 2.5 Ga. The citing authors' 1.93–1.84 Ga species-tree estimate is their own result, not this paper's. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Parker A In the blink of an eye 2003 London: Free Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chernikova, D., Motamedi, S., Csürös, M., Koonin, E. V., & Rogozin, I. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Koonin, Eugene V
Venue
Biology Direct
Published
2011-05-19
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067593790
Cited by
72
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Biology Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
last eukaryotic common ancestor, conserved residues, molecular clock, plant-insect coevolution, Cambrian explosion, eukaryotic origin
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Amino Acid Substitution, Genetic Speciation, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review