Cited by 154Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Pharmacology and metabolism of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin in the treatment of invasive candidosis - review of the literature

Open access
Kofla, G, Ruhnke, M·2011·European Journal of Medical Research

Abstract

Echinocandins represent the newest class of antifungal agents. Currently, three echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin are licensed for clinical use in various indications. They act as inhibitors of β-(1,3)-glucan synthesis in the fungal cell wall and have a favorable pharmacological profile. They have a broad spectrum of activity against all Candida species. Higher MIC's have been observed against C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii. Data from clinical trials for invasive Candida infections / candidaemia suggest that the clinical outcome of patients treated with either drug may be very similar. A comparison has been done between caspofungin and micafungin but for anidulafungin a comparative trial with another echinocandin is still lacking. All three drugs are highly effective if not superior to treatment with either fluconazole or Amphotericin B, particularly in well-defined clinical settings such as invasive Candida infections, Candida oesophagitis and candidaemia. Differences between the three echinocandins with regard to the route of metabolism, requirement for a loading dose, dose adjustment in patients with moderate to severe hepatic disease and different dosing schedules for different types of Candida infections have to be considered. Relevant drug-drug interactions of Caspofungin and Micafungin are minimal. Anidulafungin has no significant drug interactions at all. However, echinocandins are available only for intravenous use. All three agents have an excellent safety profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2047-783x-16-4-159

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rezafungin has a half-life of over 130 h in humans, compared to 24, 9-11, and 10-17 h for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively.

    “It is highly soluble in aqueous systems and has a half-life of over 130 h in humans, compared to 24, 9–11, 10–17 h half-lives of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively (Kofla and Ruhnke, 2011; Sandison et al., 2017).”

    From Fungal Cell Wall: Emerging Antifungals and Drug Resistance. (2019) · cites this paper as Kofla and Ruhnke, 2011

    Table 1 in the Pharmacokinetics section gives the cited elimination half-lives for anidulafungin (24 h), caspofungin (9–11 h), and micafungin (10–17 h). The supplied passages do not address rezafungin, so this source does not support the attributed half-life of over 130 h or its aqueous solubility. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Semisynthetic natural products derived from echinocandins showed improved properties over the parental compounds.

    “Finally, the last group includes compounds which are derived from semisynthetic natural products, such as compounds derived from echinocandins: micafungin sodium, anidulafungin, caspofungin acetate, and pneumocandin. These agents showed improved properties over the parental compounds [50, 141].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kofla, G., & Ruhnke, M.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Ruhnke, M
Venue
European Journal of Medical Research
Published
2011
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
159
ISSN
  • 0949-2321 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-783X
OpenAlex
W2072639782
Cited by
153
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • European journal of medical research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, echinocandins, invasive candidiasis, candidemia, Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, liver dysfunction, loading dose, dosing regimen, fluconazole, amphotericin B
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Drug Interactions, Humans, Molecular Structure, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides, Candidiasis, Invasive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review