The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 4 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: While loneliness has been regarded as a risk to mental and physical health, there is a lack of current community data covering a broad age range. This study used a large and representative German adult sample to investigate loneliness. METHODS: Baseline data of the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) collected between April 2007 and April 2012 (N = 15,010; 35-74 years), were analyzed. Recruitment for the community-based, prospective, observational cohort study was performed in equal strata for gender, residence and age decades. Measures were provided by self-report and interview. Loneliness was used as a predictor for distress (depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal ideation) in logistic regression analyses adjusting for sociodemographic variables and mental distress. RESULTS: A total of 10.5% of participants reported some degree of loneliness (4.9% slight, 3.9% moderate and 1.7% severely distressed by loneliness). Loneliness declined across age groups. Loneliness was stronger in women, in participants without a partner, and in those living alone and without children. Controlling for demographic variables and other sources of distress loneliness was associated with depression (OR = 1.91), generalized anxiety (OR = 1.21) and suicidal ideation (OR = 1.35). Lonely participants also smoked more and visited physicians more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the view that loneliness poses a significant health problem for a sizeable part of the population with increased risks in terms of distress (depression, anxiety), suicidal ideation, health behavior and health care utilization.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a large German community sample aged 35–74, 10.5% reported some degree of loneliness, and loneliness was associated with depression, generalized anxiety, suicidal ideation, smoking, and greater health care use after adjustment. The authors conclude loneliness is a significant public health problem in this population.
Key findings
- Among 15,010 participants, 10.5% reported some loneliness: 4.9% slight, 3.9% moderate, and 1.7% severely distressed by loneliness; loneliness declined across age groups.
- Loneliness was more frequent in women, participants without a partner, those without children, and those living alone; SES declined with increasing loneliness.
- Adjusting for sociodemographic variables and other distress, loneliness predicted depression (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.74–2.09), generalized anxiety (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.34), and suicidal ideation (abstract/discussion report OR = 1.35; Table 2 lists OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.19–1.44).
- Severe loneliness was associated with more smoking, physician visits (63% vs. 42% with no loneliness), inpatient treatment (21% vs. 13%), antidepressant use (24.8% vs. 4.5%), and anxiolytic use (3.3% vs. 0.8%).
Methods
- Cross-sectional baseline data from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), collected April 2007–April 2012: population-based, prospective, observational single-center cohort in Mainz and Mainz-Bingen, Germany; N = 15,010, aged 35–74, mean age 54.9 ± 11.1, 49.4% female.
- Recruitment was stratified in equal strata for gender, residence, and age decades; response rate was 60.3%, and 5.8% were excluded for insufficient German language or inability to participate.
- Loneliness was assessed by a single item about being frequently alone/having few contacts and suffering from it, recoded into no, slight, moderate, and severe loneliness; associations with depression (PHQ-8 ≥ 10), generalized anxiety (GAD-2 ≥ 3), and suicidal ideation were tested in multiple generalized linear models with binomial distribution and log link, adjusted for sociodemographic variables and mental distress.
Limitations
- The authors state the cross-sectional design does not permit causal conclusions; loneliness may contribute to distress and suicidality, but depression and anxiety may also lead to social withdrawal.
- The authors state they did not directly assess the size and quality of social networks, so they cannot estimate the effect of social isolation, a confounding variable when investigating loneliness.
- The authors state loneliness was measured with only a single item, and they recommend caution interpreting p-values because no adjustments for multiple testing were performed in this exploratory study; they also note that individuals under 35 years old were not studied. Evident from the text: the sample is from one German region and relies on self-report/interview measures, with a 60.3% response rate.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
24 Own result · 9 Own method · 3 Not checked yet · 3 Own interpretation
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“about 10-20% of the participants living alone indicated feeling lonely.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Loneliness was stronger in women, in participants without a partner, and in those living alone and without children.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Loneliness was more frequent in women, in participants without a partner or without children.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Loneliness was more frequent in women, in participants without a partnership, without children and in those living alone.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the age range of 45-54 years (14.2% vs. 15.4%) and 65-74 years (10.7% vs. 10.6%), no significant gender differences were observed when participant lived alone.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Type D increased considerably with the degree of loneliness.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Loneliness was stronger in women, in participants without a partner, and in those living alone and without children.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Loneliness was more frequent in women, in participants without a partner or without children.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Loneliness was more frequent in women, in participants without a partnership, without children and in those living alone.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Loneliness declined across age groups.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“loneliness declined with age.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Overall, mean age of lonely participants was lower.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“few men (1.4 to 2.7%) reported feeling lonely, whereas more than twice as many women reported feeling lonely (up to 5.9%).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“about twice as many women in partnerships (up to 5.9%) reported feeling lonely in comparison to men (1.4% to 2.7%).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SES declined with increasing loneliness.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Socioeconomic status declined with increasing loneliness.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No significant increases were found for previous unemployment, although there was a descriptive trend of a positive link between feeling lonely and previous unemployment.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no association with BMI.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“but not to other risk factors such as alcohol use or diet (BMI).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- The quote only partly states this claim. 8
- It may state two separate claims as one. 8
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lonely participants also smoked more and visited physicians more frequently.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The majority of participants (63%) with a strong degree of loneliness had visited a physician (vs. 42% with no feelings of loneliness)”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“the majority of participants (63%) with a strong degree of loneliness had visited a physician (vs. 42% without loneliness)”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average alcohol consumption was negatively linked to loneliness.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“more than half of the loneliest participants were also depressed (vs. 5% in the group with feelings of loneliness), and over 40% in this group reported anxiety and suicidal ideation (which increased from 6% to 42%) and 30% panic attacks in the past 4 weeks.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among those living alone, the highest proportion of loneliness was found in the youngest group of women in the range from 35 to 44 years (20.7%), whereas men tended to report heightened loneliness in the range from 45 to 54 years (15.4%).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there were strong increases in the intake of anxiolytics and antidepressants among lonely participants.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“generalized anxiety (OR = 1.21)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“loneliness also positively predicted anxiety (OR = 1.21)”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 10.5% of participants reported some degree of loneliness (4.9% slight, 3.9% moderate and 1.7% severely distressed by loneliness).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“A total of 10.5% reported some degree of loneliness: 4.9% were slightly, 3.9% moderately and 1.7% severely distressed by feeling lonely.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“we found that one in 10 (10.5%) participants reported some degree of loneliness.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“21% (vs. 13%) had had inpatient treatments.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“21% had had inpatient treatments.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“loneliness was associated with depression (OR = 1.91)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Loneliness as one of the predictors of the first regression model almost doubled the likelihood of depression (OR = 1.91).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lonely participants also smoked more and visited physicians more frequently.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The proportion of current smokers almost doubled with increasing loneliness.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Loneliness also contributed to smoking as an indicator for an unhealthy lifestyle”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suicidal ideation (OR = 1.35)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Prediction of suicidal ideation by loneliness was also substantial (OR = 1.35)”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“for suicidal ideation and generalized anxiety, 1.35 and 1.21”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interpretation of our findings is limited by the cross-sectional character of our study which does not permit causal conclusions.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded 5.8% of the sample due to insufficient knowledge of German language, physical or mental inability to participate.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“According to [25], caseness was defined by a PHQ-8 sum score of ≥10, achieving a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81(1):61–6. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Strengths of this study reside in the large sample size and the use of standardized self-report instruments to measure distress.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we did not directly assess the size and quality of social networks, we cannot estimate the effect of social isolation in our study which is a confounding variable when investigating loneliness.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Recruitment was performed stratified in equal strata for gender, residence and for age decades.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No adjustments for multiple testing were performed, as this was an exploratory study.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sample was drawn at random from the local registries of the city of Mainz and the adjacent district of Mainz-Bingen.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“According to [27], the sum score of the answers (0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = over half the days, and 3 = nearly every day) assesses generalized anxiety with good sensitivity (86%) and specificity (83%).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Michal M, Wiltink J, Till Y, Wild PS, Münzel T, Blankenberg S, et al. Type-D personality and depersonalization are associated with suicidal ideation in the German general population aged 35–74: results from the Gutenberg Heart Study. J Affect Disord. 2010;125(1):227–33. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The findings support the view that loneliness poses a significant health problem for a sizeable part of the population with increased risks in terms of distress (depression, anxiety), suicidal ideation, health behavior and health care utilization.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Our findings support the view that loneliness poses a significant health problem for a sizeable part of the population with increased risks in terms of distress (depression, anxiety), suicidal ideation, health behavior and health care utilization.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Conclusions
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The response rate amounted to 60.3%.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-response (response rate 60.3%) and exclusions (5.8%) did not substantially bias the prevalence and association estimates in the Gutenberg Health Study sample.
“The response rate amounted to 60.3%.”
“We excluded 5.8% of the sample due to insufficient knowledge of German language, physical or mental inability to participate.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“associations between feelings of loneliness or lack of social support and anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and self-harming behaviours tend to be stronger among young females than among males (Beutel et al., 2017; Elbogen et al., 2021).”
From Pathways of association between disordered eating in adolescence and mental health outcomes in young adulthood during the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as Beutel et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The burden of mental illness in young adulthood often stems from factors experienced during adolescence, with loneliness being a significant, yet understudied factor [9, 10].”
From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, Beutel et al. [12] highlighted a strong association between loneliness and generalized anxiety and depression, especially among middle and late adulthood individuals.”
From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and is also associated with anxiety [12, 14].”
From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research shows that loneliness represents a risk factor for depression [12, 13]”
From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Especially loneliness has been associated with an increased risk for several mental disorders and somatic diseases in general (Beutel et al., 2017; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015; Valtorta et al., 2018; Luhmann and Hawkley, 2016) and during the current pandemic (Palgi et al., 2020; González-Sanguino et al., 2020; Luchetti et al., 2020).”
From Lockdown, quarantine measures, and social distancing: Associations with depression, anxiety and distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults from Germany (2020) · cites this paper as Beutel et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“These prospective reviews have found loneliness to be a stronger predictor of later depression, when compared to anxiety or substance abuse as outcome variables”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Beutel et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Collectively, the evidence points to no gender difference in the association between loneliness and SIB crosssectionally”
From Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies (2020) · cites this paper as Beutel et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“in non-pandemic contexts, evidence suggests that the prevalence of loneliness ranges from 6–76%; with variations across demographic groups [5,13–17] and countries [18,19].”
From Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Loneliness is associated with worse physical and mental health [5–8] and increases mortality risk [9,10].”
From Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“In non-pandemic contexts, geographical isolation, living alone, and lack of social engagement predicts loneliness in adult and older adult populations [5,13,15,20,29–31].”
From Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Methods
“Loneliness was used as a predictor for distress (depression, generalized anxiety, and suicidal ideation) in logistic regression analyses adjusting for sociodemographic variables and mental distress.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
“loneliness was used as a predictor in multiple generalized linear models with a binominal distribution and a log link function adjusted for sociodemographic variables.”
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Abstract > Results
“Controlling for demographic variables and other sources of distress loneliness was associated with depression (OR = 1.91), generalized anxiety (OR = 1.21) and suicidal ideation (OR = 1.35).”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
“| Loneliness | 1.91 | 1.74-2.09 | < 0.0001 | 1.21 | 1.09-1.34 | 0.0002 | 1.31 | 1.19-1.44 | <0.0001 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Discussion
“On the other hand, middle-aged men (between 45 and 64 years) were slightly more affected than women.”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
“Women living alone in the age range 35-44 years (20.7% vs. 13.9%) and 55-64 years (19.3% vs. 11.6%) were considerably more affected by loneliness than men.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Results
“more than half of the loneliest participants were also depressed (vs. 5% in the group with feelings of loneliness)”
§ Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health > Methods > Study sample
“| Current depression (PHQ-8 ≥ 10) | 5.2 | 19.3 | 30.5 | 52.6 | < 0.0001 |”
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
(2013) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/103.1437-1588 · Cited by 11,769
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272 · cited 1×
“In a recent meta-analysis, lack of functional and structural social integration predicted a 50% increase in mortality, which is comparable to traditional risk factors [19].”
BackgroundJournal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 · Cited by 4,782
A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies
Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027504268574 · Cited by 4,781
Löwe, B., Decker, O., Müller, S., Brähler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318160d093 · Cited by 4,527
Self-citationJoiner, T. E. (2007) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjghv2f · Cited by 2,891
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Groarke, J. M., Berry, E., Graham-Wisener, L., McKenna-Plumley, P. E., McGlinchey, E., & Armour, C. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239698 · Cited by 727
Benke, C., Autenrieth, L. K., Asselmann, E., & Pané-Farré, C. A. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113462 · Cited by 585
Suicidal thoughts and behaviors and social isolation: A narrative review of the literature
Calati, R., Ferrari, C., Brittner, M., Oasi, O., Olié, E., Carvalho, A. F., & Courtet, P. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.022 · Cited by 584
The Effect of Loneliness on Distinct Health Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis
Park, C., Majeed, A., Gill, H., Tamura, J., Ho, R. C., Mansur, R. B., Nasri, F., Lee, Y., Rosenblat, J. D., Wong, E., et al. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113514 · Cited by 604
Lee, S. L., Pearce, E., Ajnakina, O., Johnson, S., Lewis, G., Mann, F., Pitman, A., Solmi, F., Sommerlad, A., Steptoe, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30383-7 · Cited by 572
Wang, F., Gao, Y., Han, Z., Yu, Y., Long, Z., Jiang, X., Wu, Y., Pei, B., Cao, Y., Ye, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01617-6 · Cited by 507
Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cardiovascular Health
Xia, N., & Li, H. (2017) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7312 · Cited by 538
The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care
Bucci, S., Schwannauer, M., & Berry, N. (2019) · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12222 · Cited by 444
Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Newby, J. M., O’Moore, K., Tang, S., Christensen, H., & Faasse, K. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236562 · Cited by 471
McClelland, H., Evans, J. J., Nowland, R., Ferguson, E., & O'Connor, R. C. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.004 · Cited by 466
Bu, F., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113521 · Cited by 462
Viertiö, S., Kiviruusu, O. H., Piirtola, M., Kaprio, J. A., Korhonen, T., MARTTUNEN, M. J., & Suvisaari, J. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10560-y · Cited by 528
Lim, M. H., Eres, R., & Vasan, S. (2020) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 · Cited by 438
Emerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G. M., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2020) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965 · Cited by 420
Loneliness at Universities: Determinants of Emotional and Social Loneliness among Students
Diehl, K., Jansen, C., Ishchanova, K., & Hilger-Kolb, J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15091865 · Cited by 373
Loneliness and risk of dementia
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Luchetti, M., & Terracciano, A. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby112 · Cited by 331
Lee, E. E., Depp, C., Palmer, B. W., Glorioso, D., Daly, R., Liu, J., Tu, X. M., Kim, H.-C., Tarr, P., Yamada, Y., et al. (2019) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610218002120 · Cited by 286
Review: Alleviating loneliness in young people – a meta‐analysis of interventions
Eccles, A. M., & Qualter, P. (2021) · Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1111/camh.12389 · Cited by 285
Buecker, S., Mund, M., Chwastek, S., Sostmann, M., & Luhmann, M. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000332 · Cited by 347
Achdut, N., & Refaeli, T. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197163 · Cited by 277
Risk factors for loneliness: A literature review
Barjaková, M., Garnero, A., & d’Hombres, B. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163 · Cited by 296
The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation
Spreng, R. N., Dimas, E., Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, L., Dagher, A., Koellinger, P., Nave, G., Ong, A., Kernbach, J. M., Wiecki, T. V., Ge, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20039-w · Cited by 236
Neurobiology of loneliness: a systematic review
Lam, J. A., Murray, E. R., Yu, K. E., Ramsey, M., Nguyen, T. T., Mishra, J., Martis, B., Thomas, M. L., & Lee, E. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01058-7 · Cited by 250
Beck, J. S., Lundwall, R. A., Gabrielsen, T., Cox, J. C., & South, M. (2020) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361320912147 · Cited by 224
Buecker, S., & Horstmann, K. T. (2021) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000453 · Cited by 225
Leddy, A. M., Weiser, S. D., Palar, K., & Seligman, H. K. (2020) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqaa226 · Cited by 228
Factors Associated With Loneliness: An Umbrella Review Of Observational Studies
Solmi, M., Veronese, N., Galvano, D., Favaro, A., Ostinelli, E. G., Noventa, V., Favaretto, E., Tudor, F., Finessi, M., Shin, J. I., et al. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.075 · Cited by 227
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Loneliness and Social Isolation: A Multi-Country Study
O’Sullivan, R., Burns, A., Leavey, G., Leroi, I., Burholt, V., Lubben, J., Holt‐Lunstad, J., Victor, C. R., LAWLOR, B. A., Vilar‐Compte, M., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18199982 · Cited by 239
Otten, D., Tibubos, A. N., Schomerus, G., Brähler, E., Binder, H., Kruse, J., Ladwig, K., Wild, P. S., Grabe, H. J., & Beutel, M. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.553071 · Cited by 253
Self-citationMariani, R., Renzi, A., Di Trani, M., Trabucchi, G., Danskin, K., & Tambelli, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.587724 · Cited by 199
Menec, V. H., Newall, N. E., Mackenzie, C. S., Shooshtari, S., & Nowicki, S. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211143 · Cited by 192
Psycho-Neuroendocrine-Immune Interactions in COVID-19: Potential Impacts on Mental Health
Raony, Í., de Figueiredo, C. S., Pandolfo, P., Giestal-de-Araujo, E., Oliveira-Silva Bomfim, P., & Savino, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01170 · Cited by 185
Smartphone usage among older adults
Busch, P. A., Hausvik, G. I., Ropstad, O. K., & Pettersen, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106783 · Cited by 218
Mund, M., Maes, M., Drewke, P. M., Gutzeit, A., Jaki, I., & Qualter, P. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221077227 · Cited by 192
Franssen, T., Stijnen, M., Hamers, F., & Schneider, F. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09208-0 · Cited by 180
Brunes, A., Hansen, M. B., & Heir, T. (2019) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1096-y · Cited by 203
Hoffart, A., Johnson, S. U., & Ebrahimi, O. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.589127 · Cited by 176
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Loneliness: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Käll, A., Jägholm, S., Hesser, H., Andersson, F., Mathaldi, A., Norkvist, B. T., Shafran, R., & Andersson, G. (2019) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.001 · Cited by 176
Emotional and social loneliness and their unique links with social isolation, depression and anxiety
Wolters, N. E., Mobach, L., Wuthrich, V. M., Vonk, P., der Heijde, C. M. V., Wiers, R. W. H. J., Rapee, R. M., & Klein, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.096 · Cited by 197
Kan, F. P., Raoofi, S., Rafiei, S., Khani, S., Hosseinifard, H., Tajik, F., Raoofi, N., Ahmadi, S., Aghalou, S., Torabi, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.073 · Cited by 174
Shaw, R. J., Cullen, B., Graham, N., Lyall, D. M., Mackay, D., Okolie, C., Pearsall, R., Ward, J., John, A. M., & Smıth, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.026 · Cited by 181
Sun, S., Lin, D., Goldberg, S., Shen, Z., Chen, P., Qiao, S., Brewer, J., Loucks, E., & Operario, D. (2022) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000568 · Cited by 138
Gasteiger, N., Loveys, K., Law, M., & Broadbent, E. (2021) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s282709 · Cited by 153
The economic costs of loneliness: a review of cost-of-illness and economic evaluation studies
Mihalopoulos, C., Le, L. K., Chatterton, M. L., Bucholc, J., Holt‐Lunstad, J., Lim, M. H., & Engel, L. (2019) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01733-7 · Cited by 159
Loneliness, Individualism, and Smartphone Addiction Among International Students in China
Jiang, Q., Li, Y., & Shypenka, V. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0115 · Cited by 153
Tso, I. F., & Park, S. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113423 · Cited by 138
Seppala, E. M., Bradley, C. M., Moeller, J., Harouni, L., Nandamudi, D., & Brackett, M. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00590 · Cited by 171
Pignon, B., Gourevitch, R., Tebeka, S., Dubertret, C., Cardot, H., Dauriac‐Le Masson, V., Trebalag, A., Barruel, D., Yon, L., Hemery, F., et al. (2020) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13104 · Cited by 134
Does unemployment lead to greater levels of loneliness? A systematic review
Morrish, N., & Medina‐Lara, A. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114339 · Cited by 149
Risk factors for suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among medical students: A meta-analysis
Seo, C., Carlo, C. D., Dong, S. X., Fournier, K., & Haykal, K.-A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261785 · Cited by 157
Tahara, M., Mashizume, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18010131 · Cited by 141
Müller, F., Röhr, S., Reininghaus, U., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18073615 · Cited by 144
The paradox of social distancing: Implications for older adults in the context of COVID-19.
Tyrrell, C. J., & Williams, K. N. (2020) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000845 · Cited by 140
Latikka, R., Hernández, R. R., Lohan, E. S., Rantala, J., Fernández, F. N., Laitinen, A., & Oksanen, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28022 · Cited by 142
The neuroscience of sadness: A multidisciplinary synthesis and collaborative review
Arias-López, J. A., Williams, C., Raghvani, R., Aghajani, M., Báez, S., Belzung, C., Booij, L., Busatto, G. F., Chiarella, J., Fu, C. H. Y., et al. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.006 · Cited by 140
Ren, Y. L., Savadlou, A., Park, S., Siska, P., Epp, J. R., & Sargin, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101061 · Cited by 137
Development of the Japanese version of the three-item loneliness scale
Igarashi, T. (2019) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0285-0 · Cited by 141
Bonsaksen, T., Ruffolo, M. C., Price, D., Leung, J., Thygesen, H., Lamph, G., Kabelenga, I., & Geirdal, A. Ø. (2023) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2022.2158089 · Cited by 187
Loneliness and mental health: The mediating effect of perceived social support
Hutten, E., Jongen, E. M. M., Vos, A. E. C. C., van den Hout, A. J. H. C., & van Lankveld, J. J. D. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182211963 · Cited by 117
Loneliness in Primary Care Patients: A Prevalence Study
Mullen, R. A., Tong, S., Sabo, R. T., Liaw, W. R., Marshall, J., Nease, D. E., Krist, A. H., & Frey, J. J. (2019) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2358 · Cited by 115
Only the lonely: A study of loneliness among university students in Norway
Hysing, M., Petrie, K. J., Bøe, T., Lønning, K. J., & Sivertsen, B. (2020) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.v2i1.2781 · Cited by 130
Phenome-wide investigation of health outcomes associated with genetic predisposition to loneliness
Abdellaoui, A., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Sealock, J., Treur, J. L., Dennis, J. K., Fontanillas, P., Elson, S. L., Nivard, M. G., Ip, H. F., van der Zee, M. D., et al. (2019) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddz219 · Cited by 106
The Effect of Gender and Culture on Loneliness: A Mini Review
Rokach, A. (2018) · Emerging Science Journal · doi:10.28991/esj-2018-01128 · Cited by 109
Hajek, A., & König, H. (2020) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2020.104080 · Cited by 105
Kerahrodi, J. G., Brähler, E., Wiltink, J., Michal, M., Schulz, A., Wild, P. S., Münzel, T. F., Toenges, G., Lackner, K. J., Pfeiffer, N., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56440-9 · Cited by 98
Self-citationLoneliness and Its Association With Social Media Use During the COVID-19 Outbreak
Bonsaksen, T., Ruffolo, M. C., Leung, J., Price, D., Thygesen, H., Schoultz, M., & Geirdal, A. Ø. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211033821 · Cited by 122
Fumagalli, E., Dolmatzian, M. B., & Shrum, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620739 · Cited by 96
Greenstone, H., Wootton, R. E., Abdellaoui, A., Denys, D. A. J. P., Verweij, K. J. H., Munafo, M. R., & Treur, J. L. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15142 · Cited by 99
Loneliness in sexual minority and heterosexual individuals: A comparative meta-analysis
Gorczynski, P. F., & Fasoli, F. (2021) · Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health · doi:10.1080/19359705.2021.1957742 · Cited by 115
Petroutsou, A., Hassiotis, A., & Ali, A. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.12432 · Cited by 92
Li, S., & Xu, Q. (2020) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105320971697 · Cited by 115
Cumulative effect of loneliness and social isolation on health outcomes among older adults
Barnes, T. L., MacLeod, S., Tkatch, R., Ahuja, M., Albright, L., Schaeffer, J. A., & Yeh, C. S. (2022) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2021.1940096 · Cited by 97
Interventions for reducing loneliness: An umbrella review of intervention studies
Veronese, N., Galvano, D., D'Antiga, F., Vecchiato, C., Furegon, E., Allocco, R., Smith, L., Gelmini, G., Gareri, P., Solmi, M., et al. (2020) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13248 · Cited by 93
Effects of selected leisure activities on preventing loneliness among older Chinese
Teh, J. K. L., & Tey, N. P. (2019) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100479 · Cited by 91
Risk factors of loneliness across the life span
Hutten, E., Jongen, E. M. M., Hajema, K., Ruiter, R. A. C., Hamers, F. J. M., & Bos, A. E. R. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075211059193 · Cited by 99
Age disparities in mental health during the COVID19 pandemic: The roles of resilience and coping
Na, L., Yang, L., Mezo, P. G., & Liu, R. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115031 · Cited by 94
Psychometric Properties of Flourishing Scales From a Comprehensive Well-Being Assessment
Węziak‐Białowolska, D., Białowolski, P., Lee, M. T., Chen, Y., VanderWeele, T. J., & McNeely, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652209 · Cited by 86
Evaluation of anxiety, depression and sleep quality in full-time teleworkers
Afonso, P., Fonseca, M., & Teodoro, T. P. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab164 · Cited by 88
Predictors and consequences of loneliness during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Rumas, R., Shamblaw, A. L., Jagtap, S., & Best, M. W. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113934 · Cited by 90
Liu, S., Heinzel, S., Haucke, M. N., & Heinz, A. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57010053 · Cited by 81
Meaning in Life, Religious Coping, and Loneliness During the Coronavirus Health Crisis in Turkey
Yıldırım, M., KIZILGEÇİT, M., Seçer, İ., Karabulut, F., ANGIN, Y., DAĞCI, A., Vural, M. E., Bayram, N. N., & Çinici, M. (2021) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-020-01173-7 · Cited by 104
In a Lonely Place: Investigating Regional Differences in Loneliness
Buecker, S., Ebert, T., Götz, F. M., Entringer, T. M., & Luhmann, M. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620912881 · Cited by 96
Hubbard, G., den Daas, C., Johnston, M., & Dixon, D. L. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-021-09967-z · Cited by 88
Emotionally focused therapy: Attachment, connection, and health
Greenman, P. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.015 · Cited by 99
“Social Ties, Health and Wellbeing: A Literature Review and Model”,
Kemp, A. H., Arias, J. A., & Fisher, Z. (2017) · Neuroscience and Social Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_17 · Cited by 79
Pan, Y., Yang, Z., Han, X., & Qi, S. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110490 · Cited by 96
Toward an anthropology of loneliness
Silva, C. O., & Parsons, M. A. (2020) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461520961627 · Cited by 79
Käll, A., Shafran, R., Lindegaard, T., Bennett, S. D., Cooper, Z., Coughtrey, A. E., & Andersson, G. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000454 · Cited by 78
Lippke, S., Fischer, M. A., & Ratz, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617267 · Cited by 87
Hettich, N., Entringer, T. M., Kroeger, H., Schmidt, P. S., Tibubos, A. N., Brähler, E., & Beutel, M. E. (2022) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-022-02311-0 · Cited by 76
Self-citationFactors associated with social isolation in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study
Merchant, R. A., Liu, G., Lim, J. Y., Fu, X., & Chan, Y. H. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02493-7 · Cited by 75
Bidirectional longitudinal associations between loneliness and pain, and the role of inflammation
Loeffler, A., & Steptoe, A. (2020) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002082 · Cited by 76
Hymas, R., Badcock, J. C., & Milne, E. (2022) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-022-00330-w · Cited by 81
Werneck, A. O., da Silva, D. R. P., Malta, D. C., Júnior, P. R. B. D. S., Azevedo, L. O., Barros, M. B. D. A., & Szwarcwald, C. L. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110292 · Cited by 70
Ernst, M., Klein, E. M., Beutel, M. E., & Brähler, E. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.085 · Cited by 84
Self-citationLoneliness, Social Isolation, and All-Cause Mortality in a Large Sample of Older Adults
Barnes, T. L., Ahuja, M., MacLeod, S., Tkatch, R., Albright, L., Schaeffer, J. A., & Yeh, C. S. (2022) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/08982643221074857 · Cited by 84
Screening for loneliness in representative population samples: Validation of a single-item measure
Reinwarth, A. C., Ernst, M., Krakau, L., Brähler, E., & Beutel, M. E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279701 · Cited by 78
Self-citationLoneliness correlates and associations with health variables in the general population in Indonesia
Peltzer, K., & Pengpid, S. (2019) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-019-0281-z · Cited by 93
Han, Z., Wang, Z., & Li, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664612 · Cited by 81
Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Older Adults With Chronic Conditions
Polenick, C. A., Perbix, E. A., Salwi, S. M., Maust, D. T., Birditt, K. S., & Brooks, J. (2021) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464821996527 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutel, M. E., Klein, E. M., Brähler, E., Reiner, I., Jünger, C., Michal, M., Wiltink, J., Wild, P. S., Münzel, T., Lackner, K. J., & Tibubos, A. N.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Tibubos, Ana N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Psychiatry
- Published
- 2017-03-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-97
- ISSN
- 1471-244X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5359916
- OpenAlex
- W2602706681
- Cited by
- 1,223
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 57.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation (AZ 961-386261/733)
- Wissen schafft Zukunft
- Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB)
- Boehringer Ingelheim and PHILIPS Medical Systems
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- loneliness, prevalence, mental health, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, suicidal ideation, living alone, singlehood, gender differences, age differences, smoking, health care utilization, Gutenberg Health Study
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Germany, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
