CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 226Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive metabolic profiling of Parkinson’s disease by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Open access
Shao, Yaping, Li, Tianbai, Liu, Zheyi, Wang, Xiaolin, Xu, Xiaojiao, Li, Song, Xu, Guowang, Le, Weidong·2021·Molecular Neurodegeneration
DOI 10.1186/s13024-021-00425-8PMC PMC7825156
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurological disease in the elderly with increasing morbidity and mortality. Despite enormous efforts, rapid and accurate diagnosis of PD is still compromised. Metabolomics defines the final readout of genome-environment interactions through the analysis of the entire metabolic profile in biological matrices. Recently, unbiased metabolic profiling of human sample has been initiated to identify novel PD metabolic biomarkers and dysfunctional metabolic pathways, however, it remains a challenge to define reliable biomarker(s) for clinical use. Methods: We presented a comprehensive metabolic evaluation for identifying crucial metabolic disturbances in PD using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. Plasma samples from 3 independent cohorts (n = 460, 223 PD, 169 healthy controls (HCs) and 68 PD-unrelated neurological disease controls) were collected for the characterization of metabolic changes resulted from PD, antiparkinsonian treatment and potential interferences of other diseases. Unbiased multivariate and univariate analyses were performed to determine the most promising metabolic signatures from all metabolomic datasets. Multiple linear regressions were applied to investigate the associations of metabolites with age, duration time and stage of PD. The combinational biomarker model established by binary logistic regression analysis was validated by 3 cohorts. Results: A list of metabolites including amino acids, acylcarnitines, organic acids, steroids, amides, and lipids from human plasma of 3 cohorts were identified. Compared with HC, we observed significant reductions of fatty acids (FFAs) and caffeine metabolites, elevations of bile acids and microbiota-derived deleterious metabolites, and alterations in steroid hormones in drug-naïve PD. Additionally, we found that L-dopa treatment could affect plasma metabolome involved in phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism and alleviate the elevations of bile acids in PD. Finally, a metabolite panel of 4 biomarker candidates, including FFA 10:0, FFA 12:0, indolelactic acid and phenylacetyl-glutamine was identified based on comprehensive discovery and validation workflow. This panel showed favorable discriminating power for PD. Conclusions: This study may help improve our understanding of PD etiopathogenesis and facilitate target screening for therapeutic intervention. The metabolite panel identified in this study may provide novel approach for the clinical diagnosis of PD in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13024-021-00425-8

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the experimental design. Totally, 460 plasma samples were collected and divided into three independent data sets for metabolomics analysis
Fig. 1 Flow chart of the experimental design. Totally, 460 plasma samples were collected and divided into three independent data sets for metabolomics analysisCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Overview of the detection and identification of metabolites in three cohorts. Briefly, each plasma sample was analyzed by both LC-MS ESI+ mode and ESI- mode to facilitate the ionization and detection of alkaline compounds and acidic compounds, respectively. After peak detection and alignment and metabolite recognition, 226, 202 and 204 metabolites were identified in each cohort
Fig. 2 Overview of the detection and identification of metabolites in three cohorts. Briefly, each plasma sample was analyzed by both LC-MS ESI+ mode and ESI- mode to facilitate the ionization and detection of alkaline compounds and acidic compounds, respectively. After peak detection and alignment and metabolite recognition, 226, 202 and 204 metabolites were identified in each cohortCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Altered metabolic profiles in drug-naïve PD compared with HC. a PLS-DA score plot of DN-PD and HC in cohort 1. R2X = 0.212, R2Y = 0.758, Q2 = 0.594. The analysis of variance was based on cross-validated prediction residuals (CV-ANOVA) data: p = 9.6139E-014, F factor = 26.7611. b Volcano plot of the differential metabolites in DN-PD filtered by univariate analysis. c Venn plot of the differential metabolites filtered by PLS-DA model and univariate analysis. d Heat map of the 50 differential metabolites in DN-PD. Blue indicates a decreased level, orange indicates an increased level. e Associations of metabolites with disease severity, duration time and age. DT: duration time; IAA: indolelactic acid; Ald: aldosterone; Pan: pantothenic acid; AceMet: N-acetyl-L-methionine
Fig. 3 Altered metabolic profiles in drug-naïve PD compared with HC. a PLS-DA score plot of DN-PD and HC in cohort 1. R2X = 0.212, R2Y = 0.758, Q2 = 0.594. The analysis of variance was based on cross-validated prediction residuals (CV-ANOVA) data: p = 9.6139E-014, F factor = 26.7611. b Volcano plot of the differential metabolites in DN-PD filtered by univariate analysis. c Venn plot of the differential metabolites filtered by PLS-DA model and univariate analysis. d Heat map of the 50 differential metabolites in DN-PD. Blue indicates a decreased level, orange indicates an increased level. e Associations of metabolites with disease severity, duration time and age. DT: duration time; IAA: indolelactic acid; Ald: aldosterone; Pan: pantothenic acid; AceMet: N-acetyl-L-methionineCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Impacts of drug therapies on plasma metabolome of PD. a PLS-DA score plot of DN-PD and DO-PD in cohort 2. R2X = 0.179, R2Y = 0.863, Q2 = 0.323. CV-ANOVA data: p = 0.0030, F factor = 5.0488. b Volcano plot of the significantly changed metabolites in the plasma of PD patients after L-dopa treatment. c Heat map of differential metabolites between treated PD and DN-PD, which showed possible drug effects to the plasma metabolome
Fig. 4 Impacts of drug therapies on plasma metabolome of PD. a PLS-DA score plot of DN-PD and DO-PD in cohort 2. R2X = 0.179, R2Y = 0.863, Q2 = 0.323. CV-ANOVA data: p = 0.0030, F factor = 5.0488. b Volcano plot of the significantly changed metabolites in the plasma of PD patients after L-dopa treatment. c Heat map of differential metabolites between treated PD and DN-PD, which showed possible drug effects to the plasma metabolomeCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Differential metabolites in PD compared with HC and NDC. a OPLS-DA score plot of PD, HC and NDC in cohort 3. R2X = 0.389, R2Y = 0.543, Q2 = 0.347. CV-ANOVA data: p = 0, F factor = 17.7056. b ~ e Box plots of FFA 10:0, FFA 12:0, indolelactic acid and phenylacetyl-L-glutamine in three groups. Data were expressed as means ± SE. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001. The ROC curves of the metabolite panel to discriminate PD from control groups. f DN-PD vs. HC in cohort 1. The ranges of AUC values at the 95% confidence interval (CI) for FFA 10:0, FFA 12:0, indolelactic acid, phenylacetyl-L-glutamine and metabolite panel were 0.584 ~ 0.820, 0.534 ~ 0.776, 0.547 ~ 0.787, 0.585 ~ 0.816 and 0.742 ~ 0.922, respectively. g PD vs. HC in cohort 2. The AUC value ranges from 0.704 to 0.898 at 95% CI. h PD vs. HC in cohort 3. The AUC value ranges from 0.778 to 0.889 at 95% CI. i. PD vs. (HC + NDC) in cohort 3. The AUC value ranges from 0.711 to 0.822 at 95% CI
Fig. 5 Differential metabolites in PD compared with HC and NDC. a OPLS-DA score plot of PD, HC and NDC in cohort 3. R2X = 0.389, R2Y = 0.543, Q2 = 0.347. CV-ANOVA data: p = 0, F factor = 17.7056. b ~ e Box plots of FFA 10:0, FFA 12:0, indolelactic acid and phenylacetyl-L-glutamine in three groups. Data were expressed as means ± SE. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001. The ROC curves of the metabolite panel to discriminate PD from control groups. f DN-PD vs. HC in cohort 1. The ranges of AUC values at the 95% confidence interval (CI) for FFA 10:0, FFA 12:0, indolelactic acid, phenylacetyl-L-glutamine and metabolite panel were 0.584 ~ 0.820, 0.534 ~ 0.776, 0.547 ~ 0.787, 0.585 ~ 0.816 and 0.742 ~ 0.922, respectively. g PD vs. HC in cohort 2. The AUC value ranges from 0.704 to 0.898 at 95% CI. h PD vs. HC in cohort 3. The AUC value ranges from 0.778 to 0.889 at 95% CI. i. PD vs. (HC + NDC) in cohort 3. The AUC value ranges from 0.711 to 0.822 at 95% CICC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Metabolic disturbances in PD. a Alterations in PUFA metabolism. b. Alterations in bile acid synthesis pathway. The red frame indicates cytotoxic bile acid, the green frame indicates neuroprotective bile acid. c The proteolytic metabolism products were increased in PD. d Alterations in tryptophan metabolism
Fig. 6 Metabolic disturbances in PD. a Alterations in PUFA metabolism. b. Alterations in bile acid synthesis pathway. The red frame indicates cytotoxic bile acid, the green frame indicates neuroprotective bile acid. c The proteolytic metabolism products were increased in PD. d Alterations in tryptophan metabolismCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 226

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shao, Y., Li, T., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Xu, X., Li, S., Xu, G., & Le, W.
Affiliations
  • Dalian Medical University (CN)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Guowang
  • Le, Weidong
ORCID
Venue
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-01-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
1750-1326 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s13024-021-00425-8
PMC
PMC7825156
OpenAlex
W3125488374
Cited by
226
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 11
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1306600)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771521, 21876169, 22004013)
  • Key Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2018B030337001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, plasma metabolomics, metabolic biomarkers, diagnostic biomarker panel, fatty acids, bile acids, L-dopa treatment, phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism, caffeine metabolites, gut microbiota metabolites, steroid hormones, indolelactic acid, Parkinson's disease diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Metabolomics, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review