Cited by 133Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Adding prediction risk to the theory of reward learning

Open access
PREUSCHOFF, KERSTIN, BOSSAERTS, PETER·2007·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

This article analyzes the simple Rescorla-Wagner learning rule from the vantage point of least squares learning theory. In particular, it suggests how measures of risk, such as prediction risk, can be used to adjust the learning constant in reinforcement learning. It argues that prediction risk is most effectively incorporated by scaling the prediction errors. This way, the learning rate needs adjusting only when the covariance between optimal predictions and past (scaled) prediction errors changes. Evidence is discussed that suggests that the dopaminergic system in the (human and nonhuman) primate brain encodes prediction risk, and that prediction errors are indeed scaled with prediction risk (adaptive encoding).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1390.005

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When some amount of uncertainty is expected, learning rates should decrease.

    “When some amount of uncertainty is expected (also referred to as outcome variance or risk), learning rates should decrease.10–14”

    From Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PREUSCHOFF, K., & BOSSAERTS, P.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
BOSSAERTS, PETER
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05
Volume
1104
Issue
1
Pages
135-146
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2136500228
Cited by
133
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swiss Finance Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
prediction risk, reward learning, adaptive learning rate, dopaminergic system, adaptive coding, reinforcement learning, primate brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Brain, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Classical, Dopamine, Humans, Learning, Neurons, Probability, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Risk, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review