The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This is the first published report on the validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), a 44-item self-report instrument designed to measure multidimensional quality of life (QL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of the FACT-General (FACT-G) plus the Breast Cancer Subscale (BCS), which complements the general scale with items specific to QL in breast cancer. The FACT-B was developed with an emphasis on patients' values and brevity and is available in nine languages. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two validation samples were used for this report. The first (n = 47) was tested twice over a 2-month period to assess sensitivity to change. Significant sensitivity to change in performance status rating (PSR) was demonstrated for the FACT-B total score, the Physical Well-Being (PWB) subscale, the Functional Well-Being (FWB) subscale, and the BCS. Sensitivity to change in QL as measured by the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) was documented in the FACT-B total score, PWB, FWB, and Emotional Well-Being (EWB). Additional validity and reliability data were obtained from a larger sample (n = 295). The alpha coefficient (internal consistency) for the FACT-B total score was high (alpha = .90), with subscale alpha coefficients ranging from .63 to .86. Evidence supported test-retest reliability, as well as convergent, divergent, and known groups validity. CONCLUSION: The FACT-B is appropriate for use in oncology clinical trials, as well as in clinical practice. It demonstrates ease of administration, brevity, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The observed mean improvements presented within this evaluation exceeded this for both groups.”
In the citing paper
“All measures were validated, brief, and non-redundant, supporting parsimony while enabling comprehensive evaluation of intervention impact.”
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
MCHORNEY, C. A., JOHNE, W., & ANASTASIAE, R. (1993) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 · Cited by 6,681
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Self-citationShort, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale
Strahan, R. F., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2 · Cited by 1,657
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., Franzini, L., Williams, A., de Haes, H. C., Hopwood, P., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2756 · Cited by 1,220
Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980
Parkin, D. M., Läärä, E., & Muir, C. S. (1988) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910410205 · Cited by 1,057
Schipper, H., Clinch, J., McMurray, A., & Levitt, M. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1984.2.5.472 · Cited by 1,052
Zubrod, C. G., Schneiderman, M. A., Frei, E., Brindley, C. O., Gold, G. L., Shnider, B. I., Oviedo, R., Gorman, J. G., Jones, R., Jonsson, U., et al. (1960) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5 · Cited by 1,034
Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?
Slevin, M., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., & Gregory, W. M. (1988) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1988.20 · Cited by 903
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,004
Takayama, T., Yamazaki, Y., & Katsumata, N. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00413-5 · Cited by 133
Eton, D. T., Fairclough, D. L., Cella, D. F., Yount, S., Bonomi, P., & Johnson, D. H. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.07.128 · Cited by 126
Self-citationReid‐Arndt, S. A., Hsieh, C., & Perry, M. C. (2009) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1581 · Cited by 132
“Participants also completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) [38], which has 44 items across six subscales, four of which were the focus of the present study: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being.”
MethodInfluentialWinters, Z., Benson, J. R., & Pusic, A. L. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181e623db · Cited by 127
Kim, E., Han, J. Y., Moon, T. J., Shaw, B. R., Shah, D. V., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1942 · Cited by 124
“…0.66 at pretest ; M 5 1.51, SD 5 0.78, Cronbach’s a 5 0.64 at post-test) is one of the most widely used scales for cancer patients’ quality of life as it addresses breast cancer patients’ emotional, physical, and body image concerns and distress related to treatments and side effects [13,52,56,57].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe quality of life and self-efficacy of Turkish breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy
Akın, S., Can, G., Durna, Z., & Aydıner, A. (2008) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2008.07.006 · Cited by 123
“Finally, the FACT-G and BCS scores were added together to form the FACT-B total score (36 items) (Brady et al.,1997).”
MethodBreast cancer survivorship in a multiethnic sample
Ashing‐Giwa, K. T., PADILLA, G. V., Tejero, J. S., & Kim, J. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20370 · Cited by 123
Yoo, H. J., Ahn, S. H., Kim, S. B., Kim, W. K., & Han, O. S. (2005) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0806-7 · Cited by 122
“After 3 months, however, the PMRT and GI group showed higher EWB (F=6.28, p<0.05) than the control group, but there were no differences in PWB (F=1.13, p>0.29), SFWB (F=0.04, p>0.95), FWB (F=1.97, p>0.17), FACT-G (F=2.25, p>0.14), BCS (F=1.67, p>0.20), and FACT-B (F=2.45, p>0.13).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEpidemiology of Lung Cancer Prognosis: Quantity and Quality of Life
Yang, P. (2009) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_24 · Cited by 122
Development of a Novel Remote Patient Monitoring System
Maguire, R., Ream, E., Richardson, A. M., Connaghan, J., Johnston, B. M., Kotronoulas, G., Pedersen, V. H., McPhelim, J., Pattison, N. A., Smith, A., et al. (2014) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000150 · Cited by 124
Ohe, Y., Ichinose, Y., Nakagawa, K., Tamura, T., Kubota, K., Yamamoto, N., Adachi, S., Nambu, Y., Fujimoto, T., Nishiwaki, Y., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-5143 · Cited by 120
Turner, J., Hayes, S. C., & Reul-Hirche, H. M. (2004) · Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/jso.20065 · Cited by 120
Harrison, S., Hayes, S. C., & Newman, B. M. (2008) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1504 · Cited by 119
“Quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (+4) [22] with the addition of the arm morbidity subscale [23].”
MethodQuality of life: a new perspective for cancer patients
Fallowfield, L. J. (2002) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc930 · Cited by 116
Gall, T. L., Kristjansson, E., Charbonneau, C., & Florack, P. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-008-9182-3 · Cited by 118
“The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is a measure of health-related quality of life specific to breast cancer (Brady et al. 1997).”
BackgroundMindfulness meditation practise as a healthcare intervention: A systematic review
Mars, T. S., & Abbey, H. (2010) · International journal of osteopathic medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2009.07.005 · Cited by 124
Liu, C., Zhuang, Y., Momeni, A., Luan, J., Chung, M. T., Wright, E. J., & Lee, G. (2014) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2981-z · Cited by 117
Sparano, J. A., Makhson, A. N., Семиглазов, В. Ф., Tjulandin, S., Balashova, O. I., Bondarenko, I., Bogdanova, N. V., Manikhas, G. M., Oliynychenko, G. P., Chatikhine, V. A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.5013 · Cited by 116
Nyssen, O. P., Taylor, S. J., Wong, G., Steed, E., Bourke, L., Lord, J., Ross, C. A., Hayman, S., Field, V., Higgins, A., et al. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20270 · Cited by 115
Scott, J. M., Iyengar, N. M., Nilsen, T. S., Michalski, M., Thomas, S. M., Herndon, J. E., SASSO, J. P., Yu, A. F., Chandarlapaty, S., Dang, C. T., et al. (2018) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31368 · Cited by 115
Zhou, K., Wang, W., Zhao, W., Li, L., Zhang, M., Guo, P., Zhou, C., Li, M., An, J., Li, J., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103565 · Cited by 116
Reid‐Arndt, S. A., Yee, A., Perry, M. C., & Hsieh, C. (2009) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347330903183117 · Cited by 118
“Pearson correlation analyses were performed to better understand the relationships between the multiple measures of functional outcomes, which included FACT-B (Brady et al., 1997), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ; Willer et al.”
MethodInfluentialA prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: Function
Campbell, K. L., Pusic, A. L., Zucker, D. S., McNeely, M. L., Binkley, J. M., Cheville, A. L., & Harwood, K. J. (2012) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.27464 · Cited by 117
“The FACT-B is designed to measure multidimensional quality of life in breast cancer survivors.(74) The FACT-B consists of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and the Breast Cancer Subscale.”
MethodMills, P. J., Parker, B. A., Dimsdale, J. E., Sadler, G. R., & Ancoli‐Israel, S. (2005) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.007 · Cited by 113
Objective and Subjective Upper Body Function Six Months Following Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
Hayes, S. C., Battistutta, D., & Newman, B. M. (2005) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-005-5991-z · Cited by 113
Efficace, F., Osoba, D., Gotay, C. C., Sprangers, M. A. G., Coens, C., & Bottomley, A. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl494 · Cited by 112
“In addition, several other commonly used cancer site-specific measures, such as the EORTC QLQ-BR23 and the FACT-B were published later in 1996 and 1997, respectively [22, 23].”
Perez, E. A., Barrios, C. H., EIERMANN, W., Toi, M., Im, Y., Conte, P., Martín, M., Pieńkowski, T., Pivot, X. B., Burris, H. A., et al. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.32392 · Cited by 112
Victorson, D., Barocas, J., Song, J., & Cella, D. (2008) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9398-2 · Cited by 141
“In the end, 23% of published studies in = 78) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients from the current study in which data were collected (these articles [2, 17-75] are denoted with an asterisk in the References).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEakin, E., Lawler, S., WINKLER, E. A. H., & Hayes, S. C. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9324-7 · Cited by 111
“These instruments have been widely used in cancer research and have excellent reliability and validity [37–39].”
BackgroundMethodAnderson, R. T., Kimmick, G. G., McCoy, T. P., Hopkins, J. O., Levine, E. A., Miller, G., Ribisl, P. M., & Mihalko, S. L. (2011) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0208-4 · Cited by 118
What has been learned from measuring health-related quality of life in clinical oncology
Osoba, D. (1999) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00192-6 · Cited by 111
Gudenkauf, L. M., Antoni, M. H., Stagl, J. M., Lechner, S. C., Jutagir, D. R., Bouchard, L. C., Blomberg, B. B., Glück, S., Derhagopian, R. P., Giron, G. L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000020 · Cited by 108
“FACT emotional well-being—Because the current study specifically targeted psychological adaptation to BCa, emotional adjustment was measured using the Emotional Well-being (EWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast (FACT-B; Brady et al., 1997).”
MethodOh, P. J., & Cho, J.-R. (2018) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000689 · Cited by 110
“This questionnaire has good validity and reliability properties.(23) Regarding internal consistency, the Cronbach's α was .”
BackgroundHan, J. Y., Kim, J.-H., Yoon, H. J., Shim, M., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2011) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.585696 · Cited by 109
“The five-item functional well-being subscale (M¼ 2.35, SD¼ 1.00) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B) was used to assess the effect of breast cancer on quality of life (Brady et al., 1997).”
MethodInfluentialMontazeri, A., Harirchi, I., Vahdani, M., Khaleghi, F., Jarvandi, S., Ebrahimi, M., & Haji‐Mahmoodi, M. (2000) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1008918310251 · Cited by 111
Han, J. Y., Shah, D. V., Kim, E., Namkoong, K., Lee, S., Moon, T. J., Cleland, R., Bu, Q. L., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2011) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.544283 · Cited by 108
“Breast cancer-related concerns is one of the most widely used scales for cancer patients’ quality of life, as it addresses breast cancer patients’ emotional, physical, and body image concerns and distress related to treatments and side effects (Brady et al., 1997).”
Cella, D. F., Paul, D., Yount, S., Winn, R. J., Chang, C., Banik, D., & Weeks, J. C. (2003) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1081/cnv-120022366 · Cited by 107
Self-citationRosen, K. D., Paniagua, S. M., Kazanis, W., Jones, S., & Potter, J. S. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4764 · Cited by 106
“B is a valid and reliable measure of physical (7‐items), functional (7‐items), emotional (5‐items), and social (7‐items) domains of QOL.35 An additional 9‐item sub‐scale of breast cancer‐related wellbeing is included in the total score.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHurvitz, S. A., O’Shaughnessy, J., Mason, G., Yardley, D. A., Jahanzeb, M., Brufsky, A., Rugo, H. S., Swain, S. M., Kaufman, P. A., Tripathy, D., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2366 · Cited by 103
Self-citationWagner, L. I., Gray, R. J., Sparano, J. A., Whelan, T. J., Garcia, S. F., Yanez, B. R., Tevaarwerk, A. J., Carlos, R. C., Albain, K. S., Olson, J. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.01866 · Cited by 112
“HRQL was assessed at baseline, 12 months, and 36 months using the FACT-General (FACT-G), a 27-item measure that assesses physical (n = 7 items), functional (n = 7 items), emotional (n = 6 items), and social/family well-being (n = 7 items).(39) For the FACT-G, a higher score indicates better HRQL.”
MethodSelf-citationYoo, H. J., Kim, J. C., Eremenco, S. L., & Han, O. S. (2005) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.12.009 · Cited by 104
Matsuda, A., Yamaoka, K., Tango, T., Matsuda, T., & Nishimoto, H. (2014) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0460-3 · Cited by 105
“The standard deviation was taken from a study of the reliability and validity of the FACT-B [23] and QOL-CS [24] if it was not reported in the literature.”
MethodInfluentialSwain, S. M., Land, S. R., Ritter, M. W., Costantino, J. P., Cecchini, R. S., Mamounas, E. P., Wolmark, N., & Ganz, P. A. (2008) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-008-9937-0 · Cited by 105
Shim, M., Cappella, J. N., & Han, J. Y. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01555.x · Cited by 105
“P A A uthor M anuscript Cancer Form (FACT-B: a multidimensional quality of life measure consisting of subscales of social well-being, physical well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and breast cancer concerns, Brady et al, 1997) and the Impact of Event Scale (Horowitz, Wilner, & Alvarez, 1979).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExpressing Positive Emotions within Online Support Groups by Women with Breast Cancer
Han, J. Y., Shaw, B. R., Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2008) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105308097963 · Cited by 110
“Breast cancer-related concerns is one of the most widely used scales for cancer patients’ quality of life as it addresses breast cancer patients’ emotional, physical, and body image concerns and distress related to treatments and side-effects (Brady et al., 1997).”
BackgroundBurris, H. A., Lebrun, F., Rugo, H. S., Beck, J. T., Piccart, M. J., Neven, P., Baselga, J. M., Petráková, K., Hortobágyi, G. N., Komorowski, A. W., et al. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28010 · Cited by 105
“and HRQOL is now regarded as an important outcome in clinical cancer trials.(14,16,17) These outcomes are especially important in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, in whom endocrine therapy”
BackgroundQuality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study
Kwan, M. L., Ergas, I. J., Somkin, C. P., Quesenberry, C. P., Neugut, A. I., Hershman, D. L., Mandelblatt, J. S., Pelayo, M., Timperi, A. W., Miles, S. Q., et al. (2010) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0764-8 · Cited by 105
Heneghan, H., Prichard, R. S., Lyons, R., Regan, P. J., Kelly, J. L., Malone, C. M., McLaughlin, R. P., Sweeney, K. J., & Kerin, M. J. (2011) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.126 · Cited by 102
Loughney, L. A., West, M. A., Kemp, G. J., Grocott, M. P. W., & Jack, S. (2015) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.027 · Cited by 101
Hershman, D. L., Unger, J. M., Crew, K. D., Awad, D., Dakhil, S. R., Gralow, J. R., Greenlee, H., Lew, D. L., Minasian, L. M., Till, C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.5595 · Cited by 101
“Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) measures physical, social and family, emotional, and functional well-being and endocrine symptoms.(25) The FACT scales have five response levels (“not at all” to “very much”), where higher scores reflect better well-being and fewer symptoms.”
BackgroundGonzalez-Hernandez, E., Romero, R., Campos, D., Burychka, D., Diego-Pedro, R., Baños, R., Negi, L. T., & Cebolla, A. (2018) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735418772095 · Cited by 97
Evolution of symptom burden of advanced lung cancer over a decade
Sung, M. R., Patel, M. V., Djalalov, S., Le, L. W., Shepherd, F. A., Burkes, R. L., Feld, R., Lin, S., Tudor, R., & Leighl, N. B. (2017) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2016.12.010 · Cited by 98
Geiger, A. M., West, C. N., Nekhlyudov, L., Herrinton, L. J., Liu, I.-L. A., Altschuler, A., Rolnick, S. J., Harris, E., Greene, S. M., Elmore, J. G., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.9901 · Cited by 100
Patient Navigation in Breast Cancer Treatment and Survivorship: A Systematic Review
Baik, S. H., Gallo, L. C., & Wells, K. J. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.67.5454 · Cited by 99
Li, J., Liu, Y., Jiang, J., Peng, X., & Hu, X. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103970 · Cited by 98
Liu, M., Li, J., Zhao, D., Yan, N. J., Zhang, H., Liu, M., Tang, X., Hu, Y., Ding, J., Zhang, N., et al. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121415 · Cited by 100
Outcome Measurement in Clinical Genetics Services: A Systematic Review of Validated Measures
Payne, K., Nicholls, S. G., McAllister, M., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. M. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00259.x · Cited by 99
Taira, N., Shimozuma, K., Shiroiwa, T., Ohsumi, S., Kuroi, K., Saji, S., Saito, M., Iha, S., Watanabe, T., & Katsumata, N. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1631-y · Cited by 98
“The FACT-B is a breast cancer-specific HRQOL questionnaire consisting of FACT-G and an additional 9 items in the breast subscale [30].”
MethodScan-associated distress in lung cancer: Quantifying the impact of “scanxiety”
Bauml, J. M., Troxel, A. B., Epperson, C. N., Cohen, R. B., Schmitz, K. H., Stricker, C. T., Shulman, L. N., Bradbury, A. R., Mao, J. J. J., & Langer, C. J. (2016) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.002 · Cited by 98
A randomised, controlled trial of the psychological effects of reflexology in early breast cancer
Sharp, D. M., Walker, M. B., Chaturvedi, A., Upadhyay, S., Hamid, A., Walker, A. A., Bateman, J. S., Braid, F., Ellwood, K., Hebblewhite, C., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.006 · Cited by 98
“The FACT-B comprises two scales; the FACT-General Scale and the breast cancer concerns subscale.(28) The Trial Outcome Index (TOI), composed of the sum of scores on the physical, functional and breast cancer concerns subscales, has been used in previous trials,(29) and its use in this investigation permits comparisons…”
MethodProspective Study of Outcomes after Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Robson, P., Heffernan, N., Gönen, M., Thornton, R. H., Brody, L. A., Holmes, R., Brown, K. T., Covey, A. M., Fleischer, D., Getrajdman, G. I., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1045-9 · Cited by 97
Aggressiveness of care in a prospective cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC
Temel, J. S., McCannon, J. B., Greer, J. A., Jackson, V. A., Ostler, P. A., Pirl, W. F., Lynch, T. J., & Billings, J. A. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23620 · Cited by 97
Galantino, M. L., Desai, K., Greene, L. A., DeMichele, A. M., Stricker, C. T., & Mao, J. J. J. (2011) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/1534735411413270 · Cited by 97
Phillips, S. M., Salerno, E. A., Conroy, D. E., Pellegrini, C. A., Mailey, E. L., & McAuley, E. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29620 · Cited by 102
“The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) assessed the Physical, Social, Emotional, and Functional Well-Being scales and breast cancer-specific concerns.(29,30) Participants were asked to indicate how true each statement was for them over the last 7 days from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much).”
MethodEmployment status and quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors
Timperi, A. W., Ergas, I. J., Rehkopf, D. H., Roh, J. M., Kwan, M. L., & Kushi, L. H. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3157 · Cited by 96
“The instrument has been well validated elsewhere [27,28], and the internal validity in our study population is high (Cronbach’s alphas are 0.”
Louie, A. V., van Werkhoven, E. D., Chen, H., Smit, E. F., Paul, M. A., Widder, J., Groen, H. J. M., van den Borne, B. E. E. M., Jaeger, K. D., Slotman, B. J., et al. (2015) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2015.08.011 · Cited by 96
The effectiveness of case management for cancer patients: an umbrella review
Wang, N., Chen, J., Chen, W., Shi, Z., Yang, H., Liu, P., Wei, X., Dong, X., Wang, C., Mao, L., et al. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08610-1 · Cited by 96
“Other versions of FACT (FACT-B [32], FACT-L [33] and FACT-E [34]) for specific type of cancer patients were developed by incorporating the four dimensions of FACT-G with additional cancer type-specific questions.”
MethodAbernethy, A. P., Zafar, S. Y., Uronis, H. E., Wheeler, J. L., Sykes, A. D., Rowe, K., Shelby, R. A., Fowler, R., & Herndon, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.017 · Cited by 96
Mathias, S. D., Crosby, R. D., Qian, Y., Jiang, Q., Dansey, R., & Chung, K. (2011) · The Journal of Supportive Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.004 · Cited by 96
Burckhardt, C., & Jones, K. (2005) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-30 · Cited by 15
“The FACT-B consists of the FACTG plus additional items that make up the breast cancer subscale [44].”
A pilot study of expressive writing intervention among Chinese-speaking breast cancer survivors.
Lü, Q., Zheng, D., Young, L., Kagawa‐Singer, M., & Loh, A. (2012) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026834 · Cited by 99
“The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) measured quality of life in physical, social, emotional, functional domains, and breast cancer concerns during the past week (Brady et al., 1997).”
Han, J. Y., Hou, J., Kim, E., & Gustafson, D. H. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.816911 · Cited by 95
“The seven-item functional well-being subscale ( M = 2.59, SD = .79) of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) was used to assess a woman’s ability to carry out everyday activities (Brady et al., 1997; Cella et al., 2003).”
MethodInfluentialQuality of Life and Psychological Well-Being of Breast Cancer Survivors in Jordan
Abu-Helalah, M. A., Al-Hanaqta, M. M., Alshraideh, H. A., AbdulBaqi, N., & Hijazeen, J. (2014) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5927 · Cited by 96
“…the Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) (Levine et al., 1988), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire (Brady et al., 1997), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire and breast module (EORTC BR 3) (Sprangers…”
MethodNyrop, K. A., Deal, A. M., Reeder‐Hayes, K. E., Shachar, S. S., Reeve, B. B., Basch, E., Choi, S. K., Lee, J. T., Wood, W. A., Anders, C. K., et al. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.32175 · Cited by 95
Milbury, K., & Badr, H. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3079 · Cited by 94
“Patients’ functional and physical well-being were assessed with the respective subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer measure [55].”
MethodUnmet Needs of Breast Cancer Patients Relative to Survival Duration
Park, B., & Hwang, S. Y. (2011) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2012.53.1.118 · Cited by 94
Watanabe, T., Sano, M., Takashima, S., Kitaya, T., Tokuda, Y., Yoshimoto, M., Kohno, N., Nakagami, K., Iwata, H., Shimozuma, K., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.3939 · Cited by 92
“Assessment of Quality of Life Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Breast 23 (EORTC QLQ-C30/B23)(16) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B).(17) QOL was assessed at baseline and 1, 4, 12, and 2…”
MethodHealth-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
Demierre, M., Tien, A., & Miller, D. R. (2005) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.141.3.325 · Cited by 92
“Through ongoing validation studies, the FACT-G has demonstrated sound psychometric properties to support its usefulness in evaluating HRQOL in cancer populations.(13,15,16) It was chosen based on its prior successful use in studies of CTCL(17) and other malignancies.”
MethodLangendijk, J. A., Aaronson, N. K., Jong, J. M. A. D., ten Velde, G. P. M., Muller, M. J., Lamers, R. J. S., Slotman, B. J., & Wouters, E. F. �. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2123 · Cited by 92
Hanna, L., Nguo, K., Furness, K., Porter, J. A., & Huggins, C. E. (2022) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12928 · Cited by 97
“The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale(54) was used in three studies: one study used the 27 item general scale (FACT-G),(28) and two studies(39,47) used the breast cancer-specific version of this tool (FACT-B).(55) Other tools used for quality of life assessment are reported in Table 1.”
MethodHe, X., Ng, M. S. N., Choi, K. C., & So, W. K. W. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104317 · Cited by 91
Cormier, J. N., Ross, M. I., Gershenwald, J. E., Lee, J. E., Mansfield, P. F., Camacho, L. H., Kim, K., Webster, K., Cella, D. F., & Palmer, J. L. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23424 · Cited by 91
Self-citationKwon, S. I., Park, Y. S., Lee, E. S., Yun, Y. H., Bae, S., Kang, I. O., Shin, K. H., & Lee, R. (2004) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0632-3 · Cited by 91
Matchim, Y., & Armer, J. M. (2007) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/07.onf.1059-1066 · Cited by 92
“…Depression Inventory (Beck et al., 1961) Penn State Worry Questionnaire (Meyer et al., 1990) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (Brady et al., 1997) Shapiro Control Inventory (Shapiro, 1992) Sense of Coherence (Antonovsky, 1987) Number of Studies 1 1 1 1 1 Number of…”
BackgroundReed, E., Simmonds, P., Haviland, J., & Corner, J. L. (2011) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.005 · Cited by 90
Physical Activity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Aune, D., Markozannes, G., Abar, L., Balducci, K., Cariolou, M., Nanu, N., Vieira, R. D. C. P. A., Anifowoshe, Y. O., Greenwood, D. C., Clinton, S. K., et al. (2022) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkac072 · Cited by 88
“Despite being self-reported, the tools assessed in this review have been validated and were also relevant to the population of interest, with some, such as the FACT-B, being specifically tailored to breast cancer survivors (122).”
MethodUtilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients
Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Brogan, B. M., Peshkin, B., Isaacs, C., Demarco, T. A., Halbert, C., Pennanen, M., & Finch, C. (2005) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0545 · Cited by 95
Hack, T. F., Pickles, T., Ruether, J. D., Weir, L. M., Bultz, B. D., Mackey, J. R., & Degner, L. F. (2009) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1590 · Cited by 89
Noal, S., Levy, C., Hardouin, A., Rieux, C., Heutte, N., Ségura, C., Collet, F., Allouache, D., Switsers, O., Delcambre, C., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.037 · Cited by 108
Validation of QuickDASH Outcome Measure in Breast Cancer Survivors for Upper Extremity Disability
LeBlanc, M., Stineman, M. G., DeMichele, A. M., Stricker, C. T., & Mao, J. J. J. (2013) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016 · Cited by 88
“Severity of arm, shoulder, or hand pain within the last 7 days 59 (39) 55 (37) 26 (17) 7 (5) 3 (2) Severity of tingling (pins and needles) in your arm, shoulder, or hand”
Assessment of Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome in Pancreatic and Other Hepatobiliary Cancers
Yount, S., Cella, D. F., Webster, K., Heffernan, N., Chang, C., Odom, L., & van Gool, R. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00422-0 · Cited by 88
Self-citationThe talking touchscreen: A new approach to outcomes assessment in low literacy
Hahn, E. A., Cella, D. F., Dobrez, D. G., Shiomoto, G., Marcus, E., Taylor, S. G., Vohra, M., Chang, C., Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., et al. (2003) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.719 · Cited by 88
Self-citationCampbell, K. L., Van Patten, C. L., Neil, S. E., Kirkham, A. A., Gotay, C. C., Gelmon, K. A., & McKenzie, D. C. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.10.022 · Cited by 88
Turnbull, L., Brown, S., Olivier, C., Harvey, I., Brown, J., Drew, P. J., Hanby, A., Manca, A., Napp, V., Sculpher, M., et al. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14010 · Cited by 70
Manning-Walsh, J. (2005) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010104272019 · Cited by 63
“Mean QOL scores of this sample were compared to normative data from a sample of women with breast cancer (FACT-B) (Brady et al., 1997) and persons with cancer or HIV (FACIT-Sp-12) (Brady et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCrew, K. D., Capodice, J. L., Greenlee, H., Apollo, A., Jacobson, J. S., Raptis, G., Blozie, K., Sierra, A., & Hershman, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0034-x · Cited by 87
“The FACT-G measures four domains of quality of life, including physical, functional, social, and emotional well-being [17].”
BackgroundTeo, I., Reece, G. P., Christie, I. C., Guindani, M., Markey, M. K., Heinberg, L. J., Crosby, M. A., & Fingeret, M. C. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3952 · Cited by 87
“Quality of life was measured by the 37-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, Breast Cancer [10,28].”
MethodDanhauer, S. C., Crawford, S. L., Farmer, D. F., & Avis, N. E. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9211-x · Cited by 87
“Quality of Life Cancer-specific QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast scale (FACT-B) (Brady et al. 1997).”
MethodInfluentialHan, J. Y., Wise, M. E., Kim, E., Pingree, R. J., Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2010) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01508.x · Cited by 87
Promise of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Oncology Practice
Beg, M. S., Gupta, A., Stewart, T. F., & Rethorst, C. D. (2017) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2016.016857 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., Deasy, S., Cobleigh, M., & Shiomoto, G.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Rush University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 974-986
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1857624176
- Cited by
- 1,752
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 86
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r29ca051926-01a1)
- National Cancer Institute (R29CA51926)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- FACT-B, breast cancer, quality of life, FACT-G, instrument validation, sensitivity to change, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, known-groups validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, physical well-being, functional well-being, emotional well-being, Functional Living Index-Cancer, self-report questionnaire
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Translations, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review