Cited by 526Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Model of the Development of Frontal Lobe Functioning: Findings From a Meta-Analysis

Romine, Cassandra B., Reynolds, Cecil R.·2005·Applied Neuropsychology

Abstract

Although past research has provided an initial examination of maturational trends of frontal lobe functioning, it has not yielded a unifying developmental model. The purpose of this study was to generate a model representing the maturation of frontal lobe function as determined principally through neuropsychological tests. A meta-analytic review of the literature on the development of frontal lobe functioning was conducted. Journal articles were identified through an initial search of PsycInfo, Medline, and ERIC for the years 1984-2004 using key words executive function*, frontal function*, development*, and age. Analyses of effect size differences across age groups assisted in determining the developmental patterns for commonly used measures of frontal functioning by providing a common metric of growth. Age-related increases across the different frontal functions were averaged providing overall age-related increases in performance. A plot was made of the development of frontal lobe functioning using the mean effect size of change in performance across age groups. The model of the development of frontal lobe functioning suggests a staging of development that begins in early childhood with the maturation of frontal functioning and continues, although at a decreased rate, into adolescence and early adulthood.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324826an1204_2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Huttenlocher, P. R. (1994). Synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex.In G. Dawson & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Human behavior and the developing brain (pp. 137-152). New York: Guilford.
  2. Huttenlocher P. R., 1987, Human Neurobiology, 6, 1
  3. Paniak C., 1996, Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9, 233
  4. 10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00076-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 526

Metadata

Authors
Romine, C. B., & Reynolds, C. R.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Published
2005-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
190-201
ISSN
  • 0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4826
OpenAlex
W1975355938
Cited by
526
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
frontal lobe development, executive function, frontal lobe function, brain maturation, developmental model, age-related cognitive change, neuropsychological assessment, early childhood, adolescence, early adulthood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review