The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When the Interface Is a Face
Abstract
People behave differently in the presence of other people than they do when they are alone. People also may behave differently when designers introduce more human-like qualities into computer interfaces. In an experimental study we demonstrate that people's responses to a talking-face interface differ from their responses to a text-display interface. They attribute some personality traits to it; they are more aroused by it; they present themselves in a more positive light. We use theories of person perception, social facilitation, and self-presentation to predict and interpret these results. We suggest that as computer interfaces become more "human-like," people who use those interfaces may change their own personas in response to them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it is generally agreed that people who are aware of being observed adapt their attitudes and behavior to match what they perceive to be more B acceptable social norms ^ (Munger and Harris 1989; Sproull et al. 1996)”
From Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers (2018) · cites this paper as Sproull et al. 1996
Citations
Cites
Designing the user interface strategies for effective human-computer interaction
Shneiderman, B. (1998) · SIGB · doi:10.1145/25065.950626 · Cited by 4,680
Measurement and Control of Response Bias
Paulhus, D. L. (1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-x · Cited by 3,867
The Journal of social psychology
Online, T. F. (1930) · Cited by 2,316
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/191666.191703 · Cited by 2,148
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991) · Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50008-3 · Cited by 1,833
Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context
(1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90054-w · Cited by 1,718
Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers
Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.398894 · Cited by 1,680
Ousterhout, J. K. (1994) · Cited by 1,627
Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457 · Cited by 1,621
CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition.
Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.164 · Cited by 1,115
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Backstrom, C. H. & Hursh-Cesar, G. (1981). Survey research (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Deiner, E., Fraser, S. C., Beaman, A. L. & Kelem, R. T. (1976). Effects of deindividusting variables on stealing by Halloween Mck-or-treaters. Journal of PGrsomZily and SoGfal ~ d r o l o ~ , 33,178-183.
- Hall, A. (1979). Gender, gender roles, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. d osenthal (Ed.), Skid in ~nwrbal cmmunicatidn (pp. 32-67). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
- Holroyd K. A., 1978, Cognitive TlCrrapr and Research, 3, 165
- Kiesler S., 1986, Arblic Opinion Quarterly, 50, 243
- 10.1037//0033-295X.98.2.164 · DOI
- Oren, T., Salomon, G. & Kreitman, K. (1990). Guides: Characterizing the interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Tlu art of human-computcr interface d u e (pp. 367-381). New York: Addison-Wesley.
- O'Sullivan M., 1985, Journal of Personality and Social Psyhlogy, 48, 5442
- Snell W. E., Jr., 1989, Scx Rolcs, 27, 467
- Zajonc R., 1965, Scicnte, 149, 269
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 · Cited by 3,057
Who Sees Human?: The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369336 · Cited by 1,228
Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018 · Cited by 986
Walther, J. B. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 · Cited by 915
Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S. B., Weisband, S. P., & Drasgow, F. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754 · Cited by 821
Self-citationQiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250405 · Cited by 737
Can a Retail Web Site Be Social?
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143 · Cited by 672
Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 · Cited by 621
The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research
Dehn, D. M., & van Mulken, S. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0325 · Cited by 567
Pavlou, P. A. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00017-3 · Cited by 510
Ho, C.-C., & MacDorman, K. F. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015 · Cited by 532
All robots are not created equal
DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. B. (2002) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/778712.778756 · Cited by 498
Self-citationPitardi, V., & Marriott, H. R. (2021) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21457 · Cited by 455
Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction
Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. T. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017 · Cited by 459
Humanizing brands: When brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me
MacInnis, D. J., & Folkes, V. S. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.12.003 · Cited by 512
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
Walther, J. B., SLOVACEK, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028001004 · Cited by 433
Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, É. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557403 · Cited by 408
Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Merget, D., & Schroeder, R. (2006) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres.15.4.359 · Cited by 399
“It doesn’t matter what you are!” Explaining social effects of agents and avatars
von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S.-H. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012 · Cited by 389
Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. E. (2000) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00029-7 · Cited by 385
Social cognition unbound: insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization
Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721409359302 · Cited by 273
Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future.
Ritterband, L. M., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Cox, D. J., Clifton, A. D., West, R. W., & Borowitz, S. M. (2003) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.527 · Cited by 352
Gong, L. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.007 · Cited by 338
Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005) · Text, Speech and Language Technology · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2 · Cited by 324
Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real
Höök, K. (2000) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(99)00006-5 · Cited by 322
Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2000) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365000027006001 · Cited by 311
Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants
Han, S.-Y., & Yang, H. (2018) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-05-2017-0214 · Cited by 317
Effectiveness of an Empathic Chatbot in Combating Adverse Effects of Social Exclusion on Mood
de Gennaro, M., Krumhuber, E. G., & Lucas, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03061 · Cited by 265
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.006 · Cited by 278
Self-disclosure, Privacy and the Internet
Joinson, A., & Paine, C. B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0016 · Cited by 264
Relational agents : effecting change through human-computer relationships
Bickmore, T. (2003) · Cited by 252
Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2121038 · Cited by 244
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., & Rickertsen, K. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240626 · Cited by 243
The Persona Effect: How Substantial Is It?
van Mulken, S., André, E., & Müller, J. M. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_4 · Cited by 235
The Nature and Consequences of Trade-Off Transparency in the Context of Recommendation Agents1
Xu, D. J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.2.03 · Cited by 230
Pradhan, A., Findlater, L., & Lazar, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359316 · Cited by 223
Negotiating via Information Technology: Theory and Application
Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00251 · Cited by 210
Xiao, Z., Zhou, M. X., Liao, Q. V., Mark, G. J., Chi, C., Chen, W., & Yang, H. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3381804 · Cited by 206
A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers.
Kiesler, S. B., Sproull, L. S., & Waters, K. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.47 · Cited by 202
Self-citationTexting with Humanlike Conversational Agents: Designing for Anthropomorphism
Seeger, A.-M., University of Mannheim, G., Pfeiffer, J., Justus Liebig University Giessen, G., Heinzl, A., & University of Mannheim, G. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00685 · Cited by 200
Product intelligence: its conceptualization, measurement and impact on consumer satisfaction
Rijsdijk, S. A., Hultink, E. J., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0040-6 · Cited by 201
Pak, R., Fink, N. P., Price, M. M., Bass, B. M., & Sturre, L. (2012) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.691554 · Cited by 204
Janson, A. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107954 · Cited by 187
Self disclosure on computer forms
Weisband, S. P., & Kiesler, S. B. (1996) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/238386.238387 · Cited by 178
Self-citationTrusting Virtual Agents: The Effect of Personality
Zhou, M. X., Mark, G., Li, J., & Yang, H. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3232077 · Cited by 176
Griffith, D. A., Krampf, R. F., & Palmer, J. W. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044219 · Cited by 172
Design of animated pedagogical agents—A look at their look
Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.08.006 · Cited by 169
Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x · Cited by 168
The Influence of Anthropomorphism and Agency on Social Judgment in Virtual Environments
Nowak, K. L. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00284.x · Cited by 174
Donath, J., Karahalios, K. G., & Viégas, F. B. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772675 · Cited by 164
Contributing to Public Document Repositories: A Critical Mass Theory Perspective
Peddibhotla, N. B., & Subramani, M. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607076002 · Cited by 163
Self-citationDisinhibition and the Internet
Joinson, A. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012369425-6/50023-0 · Cited by 174
Rosenberg‐Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017 · Cited by 164
Personification of the Amazon Alexa: BFF or a Mindless Companion
Lopatovska, I., & Williams, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval - CHIIR '18 · doi:10.1145/3176349.3176868 · Cited by 160
Pickard, M. D., Roster, C. A., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.004 · Cited by 157
User involvement and user satisfaction with information-seeking activity
Santosa, P. I., Wei, K., & Chan, H. C. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000545 · Cited by 154
Schuetzler, R. M., Giboney, J. S., Grimes, G. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.08.011 · Cited by 154
“When a CA is given a facial representation, it makes the CA appear more humanlike [57] and increases the naturalness of the communication [58].”
MethodGender affordances of conversational agents
Brahnam, S., & Angeli, A. D. (2012) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.05.001 · Cited by 158
Kron, F. W., Fetters, M. D., Scerbo, M. W., White, C. B., Lypson, M. L., Padilla, M. A., Gliva‐McConvey, G. A., Belfore, L. A., West, T. D., Wallace, A. M., et al. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.024 · Cited by 163
Marakas, G. M., Johnson, R. D., & Palmer, J. W. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0348 · Cited by 151
Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system
Moundridou, M., & Virvou, M. K. (2002) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00237.x · Cited by 141
I hate you! Disinhibition with virtual partners
Angeli, A. D., & Brahnam, S. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.02.004 · Cited by 140
Seymour, M., Yuan, L., Dennis, A. R., & Riemer, K. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00674 · Cited by 155
Obrenovic, B., Gu, X., Wang, G., Godinić, D., & Jakhongirov, I. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01889-0 · Cited by 171
Cooperating with life-like interface agents
Parise, S., Kiesler, S. B., Sproull, L. S., & Waters, K. (1999) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(98)00035-1 · Cited by 137
Self-citationKrämer, N. C., von der Pütten, A., & Eimler, S. (2012) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25691-2_9 · Cited by 135
Perceiving artificial social agents
Holtgraves, T. M., Ross, S. J., Weywadt, C. R., & Han, T. L. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.017 · Cited by 131
Five Design Principles for Experiments on the Effects of Animated Pedagogical Agents
Clark, R. E., & Choi, S. (2005) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/7lrm-3br2-44gw-9qqy · Cited by 137
Appel, J., von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., & Gratch, J. S. (2012) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2012/324694 · Cited by 133
Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys
Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., & Steiger, D. M. (2003) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00032-8 · Cited by 129
Fang, Y. (2016) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20972 · Cited by 128
Mumm, J., & Mutlu, B. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.002 · Cited by 125
Personalizing e-Learning. The Social Effects of Pedagogical Agents
Krämer, N. C., & Bente, G. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9123-x · Cited by 124
Georgescu, A. L., Kuzmanovic, B., Roth, D., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00807 · Cited by 123
Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys
Joinson, A., Woodley, A., & Reips, U. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.012 · Cited by 126
Gervais, W. M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613489836 · Cited by 127
Realism is not all! User engagement with task-related interface characters
Vugt, H. C. V., Konijn, E. A., Hoorn, J. F., Keur, I., & Eliëns, A. (2006) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2006.08.005 · Cited by 116
Social Facilitation Effects of Virtual Humans
Park, S. M., & Catrambone, R. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x249910 · Cited by 115
Krämer, N. C., Kopp, S., Becker-Asano, C., & Sommer, N. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.006 · Cited by 124
Sah, Y. J., & Peng, W. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.055 · Cited by 113
Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task
Berry, D. C., Butler, L. T., & de Rosis, F. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.006 · Cited by 113
Söderlund, M., & Oikarinen, E.-L. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-09-2019-0748 · Cited by 120
On‐screen characters: their design and influence on consumer trust
Luo, J. T., Mcgoldrick, P. J., Beatty, S., & Keeling, K. A. (2006) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040610657048 · Cited by 111
Scholten, M. R., Kelders, S. M., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7351 · Cited by 97
“Multiple studies have supported this notion by demonstrating that users preferred to interact with a “talking face” instead of a text-only interface [64], an anthropomorphic agent together with a human voice has led to greater agent credibility [55], and visible agents have led to greater positive…”
BackgroundSong, Y., & Luximon, Y. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20185087 · Cited by 113
The impact of avatar realism and anonymity on effective communication via mobile devices
Kang, S.-H., & Watt, J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.010 · Cited by 93
Sivaramakrishnan, S., Wan, F., & Tang, Z. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20075 · Cited by 106
Demeure, V., Niewiadomski, R., & Pélachaud, C. (2011) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres_a_00065 · Cited by 108
Examining the Use of Nonverbal Communication in Virtual Agents
Wang, I., & Ruiz, J. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1898851 · Cited by 103
Keeping it between us: Managerial endorsement of public versus private voice.
Isaakyan, S., Sherf, E. N., Tangirala, S., & Guenter, H. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000816 · Cited by 100
Krämer, N. C., Eimler, S. C., von der Pütten, A. M., & Payr, S. (2011) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2011.587153 · Cited by 109
Modeling Multimodal Expression of User’s Affective Subjective Experience
Bianchi‐Berthouze, N., & Lisetti, C. (2002) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1013365332180 · Cited by 97
Attractive Agents Are More Persuasive
Khan, R., & Sutcliffe, A. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.839904 · Cited by 105
Kim, T., Sung, Y., & Moon, J. H. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101406 · Cited by 112
Lee, E. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.003 · Cited by 94
Looking at human–computer interface design: Effects of ethnicity in computer agents
Pratt, J. A., Hauser, K., Ugray, Z., & Patterson, O. V. (2007) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.02.003 · Cited by 90
Automatic intention recognition in conversation processing☆
Holtgraves, T. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.001 · Cited by 93
Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B., Allen, M. R., & Kim, S. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12179 · Cited by 92
Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future
(2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470183373 · Cited by 95
User evaluation: Synthetic talking faces for interactive services
Pandzic, I. S., Östermann, J., & Millen, D. R. (1999) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s003710050182 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., & Waters, K.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Subramani, Mani
- Venue
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-124
- ISSN
- 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121965518
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- person perception, social facilitation, self-presentation, arousal, personality attribution, personas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review