Cited by 961Estrogen and related hormone effectsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence AnalysisHormonal and reproductive studies

The Free Hormone Hypothesis: A Physiologically Based Mathematical Model*

MENDEL, CARL M.·1989·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

The free hormone hypothesis states that the biological activity of a given hormone is affected by its unbound (free) rather than protein-bound concentration in the plasma. The fundamental mathematical and physiological principles relating to this hypothesis are reviewed, along with experimental data that shed light on its validity. It is shown that whether or not this hypothesis is likely to be valid for any given hormone will depend largely on which step in the tissue uptake process (plasma flow, dissociation from plasma binding proteins, influx, or intracellular elimination) is rate-limiting to the net tissue uptake of that hormone. It is further shown that the free hormone hypothesis could hold even if tissue uptake of hormone occurred by a mechanism that acted directly on one or more circulating protein-bound pools of hormone. Indeed, many of the data previously interpreted as being inconsistent with the free hormone hypothesis are in fact readily consistent with it when its predictions are fully understood. Nevertheless, the free hormone hypothesis is not likely to be valid for all hormones with respect to all tissues. It is likely to be valid with respect to all tissues for the thyroid hormones, for cortisol, and for the hydroxylated metabolites of vitamin D. For many of the other steroid hormones, however, it is likely to be valid with respect to some tissues, but not with respect to others (in particular, the liver). And for some of the steroid hormones (in particular, progesterone) it may not hold at all.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/edrv-10-3-232

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MENDEL, C. M.
Corresponding author
MENDEL, CARL M.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
1989-08
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
232-274
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2108958077
Cited by
961
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
free hormone hypothesis, hormone binding proteins, plasma protein binding, rate-determining step, mathematical model, thyroid hormones, cortisol, vitamin D metabolites, steroid hormones, progesterone, liver
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Blood Proteins, Hormones, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review