Cited by 3,209Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEstrogen and related hormone effectsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 854 of the 858 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses

Open access

Abstract

For decades, studies of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have challenged traditional concepts in toxicology, in particular the dogma of "the dose makes the poison," because EDCs can have effects at low doses that are not predicted by effects at higher doses. Here, we review two major concepts in EDC studies: low dose and nonmonotonicity. Low-dose effects were defined by the National Toxicology Program as those that occur in the range of human exposures or effects observed at doses below those used for traditional toxicological studies. We review the mechanistic data for low-dose effects and use a weight-of-evidence approach to analyze five examples from the EDC literature. Additionally, we explore nonmonotonic dose-response curves, defined as a nonlinear relationship between dose and effect where the slope of the curve changes sign somewhere within the range of doses examined. We provide a detailed discussion of the mechanisms responsible for generating these phenomena, plus hundreds of examples from the cell culture, animal, and epidemiology literature. We illustrate that nonmonotonic responses and low-dose effects are remarkably common in studies of natural hormones and EDCs. Whether low doses of EDCs influence certain human disorders is no longer conjecture, because epidemiological studies show that environmental exposures to EDCs are associated with human diseases and disabilities. We conclude that when nonmonotonic dose-response curves occur, the effects of low doses cannot be predicted by the effects observed at high doses. Thus, fundamental changes in chemical testing and safety determination are needed to protect human health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/er.2011-1050

Cites

854 of 854 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 858 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Centers for Disease Control, 2008, National Biomonitoring Program
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2009, Information for consumers (drugs)
  3. Jones, 1996, Summation of basic endocrine data, 1
  4. Hayes, 2011, Demasculinization and feminization of male gonads by atrazine: consistent effects across vertebrate classes, J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 127, 64, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.03.015 · DOI
  5. Carrasco, 2000, Thyroid iodide transport: the Na+/I− symporter (NIS), 52
  6. Ghassabian, 2011, Maternal thyroid function during pregnancy and parent-report problem behavior of the offspring up to age three years. The Generation R Study, Pediatr Res, 69, 454, 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182125b0c · DOI
  7. Sheehan, 1997, Low dose effects of hormones: a challenge for risk assessment, Risk Policy Report, 4, 31
  8. vom Saal, 1998, Challenging risk assessment, Forum Appl Res Public Policy, 13, 11
  9. Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction, 2008, Bisphenol A: public comments
  10. Taylor, 2011, Similarity of bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys and mice: relevance for human exposure, Environ Health Perspect, 119, 422, 10.1289/ehp.1002514 · DOI
  11. Carson, 1962, Silent spring
  12. Hayes, 1998, Endocrine disruptors in amphibians: potential impacts and the usefulness of amphibian screens for detecting endocrine disrupting compounds, Sci J (Kagaku), 68, 557
  13. Lee, 2010, Low dose of some persistent organic pollutants predicts type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study, Environ Health Perspect, 118, 1235, 10.1289/ehp.0901480 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,209

Metadata

Authors
Vandenberg, L. N., Colborn, T., Hayes, T. B., Heindel, J. J., Jacobs, D. R., Lee, D.-H., Shioda, T., Soto, A. M., vom Saal, F. S., Welshons, W. V., Zoeller, R. T., & Myers, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • The Endocrine Disruption Exchange (T.C.), Paonia, Colorado 81428;
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Kyungpook National University (KR)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Division of Biological Sciences (F.S.v.S.) University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211;
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Environmental Health Sciences (J.P.M.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
Corresponding author
Vandenberg, Laura N.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2012-03-14
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
378-455
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2097327668
Cited by
3,209
References
858
Citations by year
2026: 237 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 193 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 263 · 2020: 233 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 224 · 2015: 215 · 2014: 254 · 2013: 195 · 2012: 69
FWCI
27.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R56HL053560, HL 53560, R01HL053560)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM087107, GM 087107)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES08314, R01ES008314, ES010026, ES 018764, R56ES010026, R01ES010026, RC2ES018764)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, low-dose effects, non-monotonic dose-response, dose-response relationship, hormesis, chemical safety assessment, chemical testing
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Amphibians, Animals, Animals, Wild, Atrazine, Benzhydryl Compounds, Breast, Dioxins, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Environmental Exposure, Female, Herbicides, Humans, Male, Perchlorates, Phenols, Prostate, Spermatogenesis, Thyroid Gland, Twins, Sexual Development, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review