Cited by 226Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease

Tiraboschi, P., Hansen, L. A., Masliah, E., Alford, M., Thal, L. J., Corey-Bloom, J.·2004·Neurology

Abstract

Background The APOE epsilon4 allele has emerged as a major genetic factor for Alzheimer disease (AD), and its presence has been associated with an increase in beta-amyloid senile plaques (SPs) and neuritic plaques (NPs). Whether it affects neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) accumulation or cholinergic losses in AD remains controversial. In contrast, the epsilon2 allele has been reported to decrease the risk for AD. However, its effect on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of disease is unclear. Objective To investigate the relationship between APOE genotype and both pathologic severity and cholinergic dysfunction in AD. Methods In an autopsy series of 296 patients with AD, APOE genotype was determined in blood or postmortem brain tissue. NPs and NFTs were counted in the midfrontal (MF), inferior parietal (IP), and superior temporal (ST) cortices and the hippocampus. Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity was assessed in the MF, IP, and ST cortices. Results Compared with patients with no epsilon4 alleles, epsilon4 carriers (patients with either one or two epsilon4 alleles) did not differ significantly with regard to any pathologic or neurochemical measures, except for increased ST NPs. However, when cases were stratified into three groups according to the number of epsilon4 alleles, patients with two epsilon4 alleles had significantly more NPs and NFTs in all neocortical regions than those with either one or no epsilon4 alleles. The association of the epsilon4/4 genotype w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000128091.92139.0f

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ε4 allele is the strongest common genetic risk factor for sporadic AD.

    “The ε4 allele is the strongest common genetic risk factor for sporadic AD”
  • The ε4 allele influences disease risk, age at onset, and multiple aspects of the biological phenotype in a dose-dependent manner.

    “influencing disease risk, age at onset, and multiple aspects of the biological phenotype in a dose-dependent manner [6, 7].”
  • A more conclusive study with many more subjects strongly suggested that apoε4 allele dosage is associated with increased neuritic plaques in AD.

    “Nonetheless, a more conclusive study with many more subjects strongly suggested that apoε4 allele dosage is associated with increased neuritic plaques in AD (Tiraboschi et al., 2004).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Tiraboschi et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiraboschi, P., Hansen, L. A., Masliah, E., Alford, M., Thal, L. J., & Corey-Bloom, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • From the Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche (Dr. Tiraboschi), Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano, Italy; and Department of Neurosciences (Drs. Tiraboschi, Hansen, Masliah, Alford, Thal, and Corey-Bloom), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, and Neurology Service (Drs. Thal and Corey-Bloom), VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2004-06-08
Volume
62
Issue
11
Pages
1977-1983
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2117156629
Cited by
226
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG05131, P50AG005131)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE genotype, APOE ε4, APOE ε2 allele, neuropathology, neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, cholinergic dysfunction, choline acetyltransferase, amyloid plaques, genetic risk, neocortex
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, California, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Cohort Studies, Single-Blind Method, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review