CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Failure of Protein to Improve Time Trial Performance when Added to a Sports Drink

VAN ESSEN, MARTIN, GIBALA, MARTIN J.·2006·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000228958.82968.0a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have reported that adding approximately 2% protein to a carbohydrate sports drink increased cycle endurance capacity compared with carbohydrate alone. However, the practical implications of these studies work are hampered by the following limitations: (a) the rate of carbohydrate ingestion was less than what is considered optimal for endurance performance, and (b) the performance test (exercise time to fatigue) did not mimic the way in which athletes typically compete (i.e., a race in which a fixed distance or set amount of work is performed as quickly as possible). PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that adding 2% protein to a 6% carbohydrate drink (CHO-PRO) would improve 80-km cycling time trial performance, as compared with a 6% carbohydrate drink (CHO) and a nonenergetic sweetened placebo (PLAC). METHODS: Ten trained male cyclists (24 +/- 2 yr; VO2peak = 63 +/- 2 mL.kg(-1).min(-1); mean +/- SE) performed an 80-km laboratory time trial (TT) on three occasions separated by 7 d. In a double-blind crossover manner, subjects ingested CHO-PRO, CHO, or PLAC at a rate of 250 mL every 15 min with no temporal, verbal, or physiological feedback. RESULTS: Time to complete the TT was 4.4% lower (P < 0.002) during CHO (135 +/- 9 min) and CHO-PRO (135 +/- 9) compared with PLAC (141 +/- 10), with no difference between CHO and CHO-PRO (P = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Ingesting 6% carbohydrate at a rate of 1 L.h(-1) (60 g.h(-1)) improved an 80-km TT performance in trained male cyclists. However, adding 2% protein to a 6% carbohydrate drink provided no additional performance benefit during a task that closely simulated the manner in which athletes typically compete.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000228958.82968.0a

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
VAN ESSEN, M., & GIBALA, M. J.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
ORCID
GIBALA, MARTIN J.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2006-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1476-1483
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1249/01.mss.0000228958.82968.0a
OpenAlex
W2093997012
Cited by
118
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
protein supplementation, sports drinks, carbohydrate intake, time trial performance, cycling, endurance performance, trained cyclists
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Beverages, Bicycling, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Humans, Insulin, Male, Physical Endurance, Proteins, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Treatment Failure, Cross-Over Studies, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review