Cited by 165Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Effects of Whey Isolate, Creatine, and Resistance Training on Muscle Hypertrophy

Open access
CRIBB, PAUL J., WILLIAMS, ANDREW D., STATHIS, CHRIS G., CAREY, MICHAEL F., HAYES, ALAN·2007·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies that have attributed gains in lean body mass to dietary supplementation during resistance exercise (RE) training have not reported these changes alongside adaptations at the cellular and subcellular levels. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two popular supplements--whey protein (WP) and creatine monohydrate (CrM) (both separately and in combination)--on body composition, muscle strength, fiber-specific hypertrophy (i.e., type I, IIa, IIx), and contractile protein accrual during RE training. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized protocol, resistance-trained males were matched for strength and placed into one of four groups: creatine/carbohydrate (CrCHO), creatine/whey protein (CrWP), WP only, or carbohydrate only (CHO) (1.5 g x kg(-1) body weight per day). All assessments were completed the week before and after an 11-wk structured, supervised RE program. Assessments included strength (1RM, three exercises), body composition (DEXA), and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies for determination of muscle fiber type (I, IIa, IIx), cross-sectional area (CSA), contractile protein, and creatine (Cr) content. RESULTS: Supplementation with CrCHO, WP, and CrWP resulted in significantly greater (P < 0.05) 1RM strength improvements (three of three assessments) and muscle hypertrophy compared with CHO. Up to 76% of the strength improvements in the squat could be attributed to hypertrophy of muscle involved in this exercise. However, the hypertrophy responses within these groups varied at the three levels assessed (i.e., changes in lean mass, fiber-specific hypertrophy, and contractile protein content). CONCLUSIONS: Although WP and/or CrM seem to promote greater strength gains and muscle morphology during RE training, the hypertrophy responses within the groups varied. These differences in skeletal muscle morphology may have important implications for various populations and, therefore, warrant further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000247002.32589.ef

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The addition of creatine to whey protein supplementation appears to further augment adaptations.

    “The addition of creatine to whey protein supplementation appears to further augment these adaptations [27, 72, 95]”

    From International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise (2017) · cites this paper as [27]

    Paragraph 21 states that creatine-containing supplements produced greater strength and hypertrophy improvements than carbohydrate, but not than whey protein alone. The paper therefore does not find that adding creatine further augments those adaptations relative to whey protein supplementation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The average RET-induced increase in 1RM strength was 27 kg.

    “The average RET-induced increase, with all measures of 1RM included, was 27 kg (mean±SD; 27±22 kg22 32).”

    From A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults (2018) · cites this paper as [32]

    The 1RM strength-results passage (paragraph 15; page unavailable) reports that all groups improved on bench press, pulldown and squat after resistance training. It does not report an average increase of 27 kg across the 1RM measures or the cited 27 ± 22 kg statistic. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Co-ingesting creatine with different types of protein may have differential effects on gains in fat-free mass and/or training adaptations.

    “Additionally, co-ingesting creatine with different types of protein may have differential effects on gains in fat-free mass and/or training adaptations (Kerksick et al. 2007; Cribb et al. 2007b).”

    From Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and regulatory status of novel forms of creatine (2011) · cites this paper as Cribb et al. 2007b

    The Abstract describes a creatine–whey protein group and measures lean mass and training adaptations. But the study did not compare creatine co-ingested with different types of protein: its other creatine group received carbohydrate. The Body composition section reports no significant lean-mass difference between those two groups, so this paper does not establish the proposed differential effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many published investigations report that protein supplementation results in significant improvements in lean body weight/cross-sectional areas compared to placebo treatments.

    “many published investigations report that protein supplementation results in significant improvements in lean body weight/cross-sectional areas as compared to placebo treatments [15, 17, 21–23, 26, 27, 33, 37].”
  • Ten of the 17 reviewed studies showed superior muscular benefits of a higher protein intake over control.

    “Ten of the 17 studies [1-10] showed superior muscular benefits of a higher protein intake over control (Figure 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baechle TR and Earle RW. 2nd Ed. Human Kinetics: Champaign IL, 2000, pp. 20; 409.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CRIBB, P. J., WILLIAMS, A. D., STATHIS, C. G., CAREY, M. F., & HAYES, A.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2007-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
298-307
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096008312
Cited by
165
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
whey protein isolate, creatine monohydrate, resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, dietary supplementation, muscle fiber type, cross-sectional area, contractile proteins, muscle strength, body composition, lean body mass, creatine, vastus lateralis, squatting
MeSH terms
Whey Proteins, Adult, Contractile Proteins, Creatine, Humans, Male, Milk Proteins, Muscle Contraction, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review