The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations
Abstract
In an era of revolutionary new developments in basic information technology, innovation in its employment among organizations is increasingly crucial to competitive survival and success. The Information Systems (IS) unit within the business is largely responsible for meeting this challenge. Yet, current theory explains little about IS innovation and its role in organizational innovation in general. We suggest some needed foundations. IS innovations are posited to be of three types: Type I innovations confined to the IS task; Type II innovations supporting administration of the business; and Type III innovations imbedded in the core technology of the business. Diffusion among organizations is conjectured to occur by means of a communication circuit in which each IS unit is linked to its professional and business environments. Systematic differences in adoption and evolution patterns among IS innovation types are expected. Three specific IS innovations—data administration, the information center, and material requirements planning (MRP)—illustrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393552 · Cited by 947
Cited by
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective1
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.07 · Cited by 1,949
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0045 · Cited by 1,723
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487 · Cited by 1,440
The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework
Baker, J. (2012) · Integrated Series in Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12 · Cited by 1,275
Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption
Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571111161262 · Cited by 1,181
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1 · Cited by 1,108
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475 · Cited by 1,043
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12093 · Cited by 806
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Gurbaxani, V., & Xu, S. X. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148771 · Cited by 500
A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2018-0365 · Cited by 436
Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2005) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2005.11043963 · Cited by 429
Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore: An empirical study
Teo, T. S. H., Lin, S., & Lai, K.-H. (2009) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.001 · Cited by 397
Hong, W., & Zhu, K. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.06.003 · Cited by 390
Kim, D. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305281619 · Cited by 342
Defining and identifying disruptive innovations
Nagy, D., Schuessler, J., & Dubinsky, A. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.017 · Cited by 260
Organizational characteristics and the CRM adoption process
Ko, E., Kim, S. H., Kim, M., & Woo, J. Y. (2008) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.011 · Cited by 217
Dimensions of national culture and corporate adoption of IT infrastructure
Png, I. P. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wee, K.-L. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.913164 · Cited by 197
E-business value creation in Small and Medium Enterprises: a US study using the TOE framework
Wen, K. W., & Chen, Y. (2010) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2010.030717 · Cited by 88
Exploring the Role of Government in Information Technology Diffusion
Zhang, C., Cui, L., Huang, L., & Zhang, C. (2007) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_26 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Swanson, E. B.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1069-1092
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2080647889
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
