The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science
Abstract
Complex organizations exhibit surprising, nonlinear behavior. Although organization scientists have studied complex organizations for many years, a developing set of conceptual and computational tools makes possible new approaches to modeling nonlinear interactions within and between organizations. Complex adaptive system models represent a genuinely new way of simplifying the complex. They are characterized by four key elements: agents with schemata, self-organizing networks sustained by importing energy, coevolution to the edge of chaos, and system evolution based on recombination. New types of models that incorporate these elements will push organization science forward by merging empirical observation with computational agent-based simulation. Applying complex adaptive systems models to strategic management leads to an emphasis on building systems that can rapidly evolve effective adaptive solutions. Strategic direction of complex organizations consists of establishing and modifying environments within which effective, improvised, self-organized solutions can evolve. Managers influence strategic behavior by altering the fitness landscape for local agents and reconfiguring the organizational architecture within which agents adapt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, R. A. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393493 · Cited by 1,018
Horgan, J. (1995) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0695-104 · Cited by 407
Cited by
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0298 · Cited by 861
Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413 · Cited by 804
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006 · Cited by 599
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567
Keshavarz, N., Nutbeam, D., Rowling, L., & Khavarpour, F. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.034 · Cited by 335
Organizational Learning, Innovation and Internationalization: A Complex System Model
Chiva, R., Ghauri, P., & Alegre, J. (2014) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12026 · Cited by 291
Studying Complex Discursive Systems..: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication
Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., Mcphee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00802.x · Cited by 274
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: How a Systems Perspective Informs Paradox Research
Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12398 · Cited by 266
Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14520 · Cited by 236
A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 · Cited by 141
Nilsson, F., & Darley, V. (2006) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570610710588 · Cited by 125
How “smart cities” will change supply chain management
Tachizawa, E. M., Alvarez-Gil, M. J., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-03-2014-0108 · Cited by 124
Business group characteristics and affiliated firm innovation: The case of Taiwan
Hsieh, T.-J., Yeh, R.-S., & Chen, Y.-J. (2010) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.018 · Cited by 110
Coordinated Exploration for Grand Challenges: The Role of Advocacy Groups in Search Consortia
Olsen, A. Ø., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0730 · Cited by 110
Knowledge Creation and Organizational Capabilities of Innovating and Imitating Firms
Lewin, A. Y., & Massini, S. (2004) · Organizations as Knowledge Systems · doi:10.1057/9780230524545_10 · Cited by 108
Harnessing the Power of Self-Organization in an Online Community During Organizational Crisis1
Nan, N., & Lu, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.09 · Cited by 107
The Sustainability of Polycentric Information Commons1
Mindel, V., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14015 · Cited by 90
Rethinking Virtuality and Its Impact on Teams
Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X., & Wilbon, A. D. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415573795 · Cited by 71
Entrepreneurial ecosystems: towards a systemic approach to entrepreneurship?
Fredin, S., & Lidén, A. (2020) · Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography · doi:10.1080/00167223.2020.1769491 · Cited by 70
Understanding customer journey from the lenses of complexity theory
Varnali, K. (2019) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2018.1445725 · Cited by 64
Brunswicker, S., Almirall, E., & Majchrzak, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13561 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 216-232
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1979058254
- Cited by
- 2,118
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.