The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations
Abstract
As both technologies and organizations undergo dramatic changes in form and function, organizational researchers are increasingly turning to concepts of innovation, emergence, and improvisation to help explain the new ways of organizing and using technology evident in practice. With a similar intent, I propose an extension to the structurational perspective on technology that develops a practice lens to examine how people, as they interact with a technology in their ongoing practices, enact structures which shape their emergent and situated use of that technology. Viewing the use of technology as a process of enactment enables a deeper understanding of the constitutive role of social practices in the ongoing use and change of technologies in the workplace. After developing this lens, I offer an example of its use in research, and then suggest some implications for the study of technology in organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some employees may react favorably to these changes, while the others may perceive these changes as a threat to their well-being (Orlikowski, 2000;Boudreau & Robey, 2005).”
From Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“Therefore, instead of conceptualizing opacity as inherent or fixed features of AI tools, we view opacity as something produced and enacted through practices situated in specific organizational configurations (Leonardi 2011, Orlikowski 2000).”
From To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as Orlikowski 2000
In the citing paper
“That is, people are an essential part of the information system, and business benefits are not produced by the technology alone (Orlikowski, 2000).”
From An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems (2012) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“They interpret their actions in order to make sense of what they are doing and, though their choices of how to proceed appear automatic or mindless at times, there is always the possibility of resisting expectations and doing otherwise (Giddens, 1984; Orlikowski, 2000).”
From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Orlikowski, 2000
In the citing paper
“From this perspective, non- or partial adoption, mis-use, non-use and workarounds, are not simply negative effects, pathologies or signs of failure, but are different enactments of the ‘technology-in-use’ [58,79].”
Citations
Cites
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,591
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
Central Problems in Social Theory
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 8,061
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Barley S. R., 1988, Res. Soc. Organ., 6, 33
- Bazerman C., 1994, Genre and the New Rhetoric, 79
- Bijker W. E., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems
- Bijker W. E., 1992, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change
- 10.2307/255924 · DOI
- Ciborra C. U., 1996, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, 369
- DeJean D., 1991, Lotus Notes at Work
- Greif I., 1988, Computer Supported Cooperative Work
- Grudin J., 1989, Office: Tech. and People, 4, 245
- Hedberg B., 1997, Virtual Organizations and Beyond
- Iacono S., IT and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice
- Lant T., 1999, Advances in Management Cognition and Organizational Information Processing, 6, 171
- Latour B., 1992, Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225
- Marx L., 1994, Does Technology Drive History?
- 10.2307/256817 · DOI
- Tenkasi R. V., 1993, Res. in Organ. Change and Development, 7, 77
- Walsham G., 1991, J. Appl. Systems Anal., 17, 77
- Weick K., 1990, Technology and Organizations, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,005
Practice? It’s a Matter of Taste!
Gherardi, S. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340812 · Cited by 239
Poston, R. S., & Speier, C. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148678 · Cited by 236
An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package–organisation misalignments
Soh, C., & Sia, S. K. (2004) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2004.11.001 · Cited by 235
Diniz, E. H., Birochi, R., & Pozzebon, M. (2011) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.006 · Cited by 236
Strategy after modernism: recovering practice
Whittington, R. (2004) · European Management Review · doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500006 · Cited by 236
Zhang, Y., Wang, H. C., & Zhou, X. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0412 · Cited by 238
Real time: Unwinding technocratic and anthropological knowledge
Riles, A. (2004) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.392 · Cited by 236
Opportunities as Artifacts and Entrepreneurship as Design
Berglund, H., Bousfiha, M., & Mansoori, Y. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0285 · Cited by 248
Leonardi, P. M. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0529 · Cited by 230
Toward a Process Theory of Making Sustainability Strategies Legitimate in Action
Hengst, I.-A., Jarzabkowski, P. A., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0960 · Cited by 233
Sociomateriality — Taking the wrong turning?
Mutch, A. (2013) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.001 · Cited by 231
General Strategy Concepts and the Ecology of Strategy Discourses: A Systemic-Discursive Perspective
Seidl, D. N. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606067994 · Cited by 232
Bader, V., & Kaiser, S. (2019) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508419855714 · Cited by 232
The politics of networked innovation
Swan, J. A., & Scarbrough, H. (2005) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726705057811 · Cited by 243
Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model1
Nan, N. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044054 · Cited by 236
Fuller, R. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0167 · Cited by 228
Burton‐Jones, A., & Volkoff, O. (2017) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0702 · Cited by 260
The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes1
Dennis, A. R., & Garfield (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036532 · Cited by 226
Toward a complexity theory of information systems development
Benbya, H., & McKelvey, B. (2006) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593840610649952 · Cited by 245
Flow in Knowledge Work: High Performance Experience in the Design of National Security Technology
Quinn, R. W. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.50.4.610 · Cited by 238
Davidson, & Chismar, W. G. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148818 · Cited by 223
Managing e‐Government: value positions and relationships
Rose, J., Persson, J. S., Heeager, L. T., & Zahir Irani, A. (2014) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12052 · Cited by 262
What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment
Slayton, R. (2017) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00267 · Cited by 224
Work–life boundary management and the personal digital assistant
Golden, A. G., & Geisler, C. (2007) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726707076698 · Cited by 224
Is e-marketing coming of age? An examination of the penetration of e-marketing and firm performance
Brodie, R. J., Winklhofer, H. M., Coviello, N. E., & Johnston, W. J. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20071 · Cited by 222
Research Note —A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams
Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0149 · Cited by 220
Bresman, H. M., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0783 · Cited by 230
Artificial intelligence as digital agency
Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1721947 · Cited by 217
Task-Technology Fit for Mobile Information Systems
Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. J., & Gribbins, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2010.10 · Cited by 225
Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach
Luna‐Reyes, L. F., Zhang, J., Gil-García, J. R., & Cresswell, A. M. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000524 · Cited by 215
Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change
Leonardi, P. M. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0284 · Cited by 222
Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880903483599 · Cited by 211
Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2014.01.004 · Cited by 213
Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies
Bailey, D. E., & Barley, S. R. (2019) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286 · Cited by 215
Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems
Butler, B. S., & Gray, P. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017307.2017309 · Cited by 208
Guest editors’ introduction: Actor‐network theory and information systems. What's so special?
Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M., & Berg, M. (2004) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593840410542466 · Cited by 224
Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems
Benders, J., Batenburg, R. S., & van der Blonk, H. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.06.002 · Cited by 207
Deconstructing information packages
Kallinikos, J. (2004) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593840410522152 · Cited by 205
Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use
Vaast, E., & Walsham, G. (2004) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.10.001 · Cited by 206
Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals1
Schmitz, K. W., Teng, J. T. C., & Webb, K. J. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07 · Cited by 205
Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism
Jarzabkowski, P. A., Matthiesen, J. K., & de Ven, A. H. V. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596605.011 · Cited by 207
Coping with Information Technology: Mixed Emotions, Vacillation, and Nonconforming Use Patterns
Stein, M.-K., Newell, S., Wagner, E., & Galliers, R. (2015) · MIS Q. · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.2.05 · Cited by 217
Extracting Business Value from IT: A Sensemaking Perspective of Post-Adoptive Use
Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., Rai, A., & Xu, S. X. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1398 · Cited by 210
IM = Interruption Management? Instant Messaging and Disruption in the Workplace
Garrett, R., & Danziger, J. Ν. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00384.x · Cited by 206
Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511777882.002 · Cited by 208
Self-citationFayard, A., & Weeks, J. M. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001 · Cited by 230
Black, L. J., Carlile, P. R., & Repenning, N. P. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131491 · Cited by 203
Failures of Fairness in Automation Require a Deeper Understanding of Human–ML Augmentation
Teodorescu, M. H., Morse, L., Awwad, Y., & Kane, G. C. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16535 · Cited by 219
Attitude towards E‐HRM: an empirical study at Philips
Voermans, M., & van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. (2007) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480710822418 · Cited by 197
Iyengar, K. P., Sweeney, J. R., & Montealegre, R. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.3.05 · Cited by 204
Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena
Luna‐Reyes, L. F., & Gil-García, J. R. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007 · Cited by 202
Comparing Organizational Routines as Recurrent Patterns of Action
Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840610373200 · Cited by 202
The social media innovation challenge in the public sector
Mergel, I. A. (2012) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-2012-000281 · Cited by 195
Developing Issue-Selling Effectiveness over Time: Issue Selling as Resourcing
Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0266 · Cited by 193
Theorizing about the service dominant logic: The bridging role of middle range theory
Brodie, R. J., Saren, M., & Pels, J. (2011) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110393714 · Cited by 205
Working Alone Together: Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise
Bruns, H. C. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0756 · Cited by 200
A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation
Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2020) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12307 · Cited by 219
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191
Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726711405552 · Cited by 208
A time use perspective on the materials intensity of consumption
Jalas, M. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00018-6 · Cited by 187
Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS
Peppard, J., Galliers, R. D., & Thorogood, A. (2014) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2014.01.002 · Cited by 183
Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use
Rennecker, J. A., & Godwin, L. N. (2005) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.004 · Cited by 183
Dossick, C. S., & Neff, G. (2011) · Engineering Project Organization Journal · doi:10.1080/21573727.2011.569929 · Cited by 196
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
Bolívar–Ramos, M. T., Morales, V. J. G., & Sánchez, E. G. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.006 · Cited by 191
Markham, A. N. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820929322 · Cited by 211
On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function
Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40632318 · Cited by 179
Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective
Wagner, E. L., Newell, S., Piccoli, G., & de Manage, G. E. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00227 · Cited by 181
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178
Jones, M. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.12 · Cited by 181
Canato, A., Ravasi, D., & Phillips, N. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0093 · Cited by 191
Organizing practices in services: capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation
Dougherty, D. (2004) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127004040914 · Cited by 177
A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S‐D logic and service systems
Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/17566691311316220 · Cited by 184
Drivers of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing
Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., & Vogelsang, K. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.493 · Cited by 191
Meijer, A., Lorenz, L., & Wessels, M. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13391 · Cited by 174
HUMAN-CENTERED VS. USER-CENTERED APPROACHES TO INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN
Gasson, S. (2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 171
Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D
Bresman, H. M. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0725 · Cited by 175
Unity in Diversity: Electronic Patient Record Use in Multidisciplinary Practice
Oborn, E., Barrett, M. I., & Davidson, E. (2011) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0372 · Cited by 179
Affordance potency: Explaining the actualization of technology affordances
Anderson, C. S., & Robey, D. (2017) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.03.002 · Cited by 203
Predicting knowledge sharing practices through intention: A test of competing models
Kuo, F., & Young, M. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.015 · Cited by 172
Cocreating Rigorous and Relevant Knowledge
Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0487 · Cited by 172
Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects — A game theoretic analysis
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Pathak, P. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.006 · Cited by 171
Carlo, J. L., Lyytinen, K., & Boland (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703499 · Cited by 181
Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organisations
Wu, S. H., Lin, L. Y., & Hsu, M. (2007) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2007.013496 · Cited by 169
A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems
Bostrom, R. P., Gupta, S., & Thomas, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260102 · Cited by 202
Does e-HRM lead to better HRM service?
Bondarouk, T. V., Harms, R., & Lepak, D. P. (2015) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1118139 · Cited by 202
Faik, I., Barrett, M. I., & Oborn, E. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14193 · Cited by 188
The corporeality of practice-based learning
Yakhlef, A. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609357384 · Cited by 166
Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice
Barassi, V., & Treré, E. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812445878 · Cited by 166
Untapped Riches of Meso-Level Applications in Multilevel Entrepreneurship Mechanisms
Kim, P. H., Wennberg, K. J., & Croidieu, G. P. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2015.0137 · Cited by 166
How are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation
Ansari, S. S., Reinecke, J., & Spaan, A. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614539310 · Cited by 173
Institutional Multiplicity in Practice: A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel
Zilber, T. B. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0611 · Cited by 165
Actionable Strategy Knowledge:
Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Wilson, D. C. (2006) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2006.05.009 · Cited by 174
Actualizing big data analytics affordances: A revelatory case study
Dremel, C., Herterich, M. M., Wulf, J., & Brocke, J. V. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.10.007 · Cited by 188
Valentine, M., Retelny, D., To, A., Rahmati, N., Doshi, T. S., & Bernstein, M. S. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025811 · Cited by 168
Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda
Zamith, R. (2018) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999 · Cited by 162
What academic research tells us about service
Rust, R. T., & Miu, C. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1139922.1139948 · Cited by 163
Creative Projects: A Less Routine Approach Toward Getting New Things Done
Obstfeld, D. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0706 · Cited by 163
Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts
Soderstrom, S. B., & Weber, K. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219836670 · Cited by 161
Paolo Quattrone, A., & Hopper, T. (2006) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.06.001 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlikowski, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- ORCID
- Orlikowski, Wanda J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-428
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1996293917
- Cited by
- 4,760
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 251 · 2025: 197 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 173 · 2017: 151 · 2016: 192 · 2015: 240 · 2014: 289 · 2013: 270 · 2012: 262
- FWCI
- 160.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- technology in organizations, enactment, social practices, improvisation, innovation, situated practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
