The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems
Abstract
Platform-based technology ecosystems are new forms of organizing independent actors’ innovations around a stable product system. This collective organization is proving superior to traditional, vertically integrated systems in many sectors because of greater “generativity”—the ecosystem’s capacity to foster complementary innovation from autonomous, heterogeneous firms—which extends the usage scope and value of the platform to users. However, greater generativity can also lead to greater variance in the way ecosystem members’ contributions satisfy users’ needs, and it could potentially hinder the ecosystems’ value creation. We draw on collective action theory to examine generativity’s impact on user satisfaction and the mechanisms driving it. We argue that products enhancing user satisfaction contribute to a collective, shared asset, the platform system reputation, from which all participants benefit. Thus, generativity has both a positive (system reputation) and negative (free-riding) effect on the ecosystem members’ incentives for developing products that enhance user satisfaction. We argue that the negative free-riding effect prevails as the platform system matures and competition with alternative platform systems increases. Using data from the video game industry, we find supportive evidence for the free-riding effect, which generates an average loss in total revenue for first-rate games of about $36.5 million and a drop of about 3.3% in the console’s market share. By identifying the conditions that exacerbate free riding in platform ecosystems, our study contributes to the understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of platform ecosystems. It also highlights one feedback mechanism governing collective action in ecosystems and its implications for value creation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, digital platform ecosystems commonly draw on consumer ratings of product quality as a measure indicating the value the platform offering has for its users (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019;Kircher & Foerderer, 2024).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cennamo & Santaló, 2019
In the citing paper
“As they design their digital product, complementors in platform ecosystems face a trade-off between value creation and value capture in their strategic decisions (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019;Jacobides et al., 2024).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cennamo & Santaló, 2019
In the citing paper
“Platforms alter how customers access and utilize products and services by extending their value and functionalities (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Cennamo & Santaló, 2019
In the citing paper
“Consequently, DPEs are likely to consist of a mix of complementors either being exclusively engaged or seeking to multi-home in competing ecosystems to boost sales (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Cennamo & Santaló, 2019
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression
Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005) · Identification and Inference for Econometric Models · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614491.006 · Cited by 7,211
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Self-citationCompetition in two-sided markets
Armstrong, M. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · Cited by 3,315
Two-sided markets: A progress report
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · Cited by 2,994
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Adner, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316678451 · Cited by 2,600
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555589 · Cited by 2,554
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Belsley DA, 2004, Regression Diagnostic: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
- Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Boston).
- Majchrzak A, 2012, Technology Affordances and Constraint Theory of MIS
- 10.2307/20159628 · DOI
- Zittrain JL, 2006, Harvard Law Rev., 119, 1974
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540
Integrating Research on Interorganizational Networks and Ecosystems
Shipilov, A. V., & Gawer, A. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0121 · Cited by 513
Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218 · Cited by 560
Competing in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective
Cennamo, C. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0048 · Cited by 487
Self-citationDigital transformation, for better or worse: a critical multi‐level research agenda
Dąbrowska, J., Almpanopoulou, A., Brem, A., Chesbrough, H. W., Cucino, V., Minin, A. D., Giones, F., Hakala, H., Marullo, C., Mention, A., et al. (2022) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12531 · Cited by 442
Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063211045023 · Cited by 345
Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods
Helfat, C. E., Kaul, A., Ketchen, D. J., Barney, J. B., Chatain, O., & Singh, H. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3500 · Cited by 405
Ecosystem Legitimacy Emergence: A Collective Action View
Thomas, L. D. W., & Ritala, P. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320986617 · Cited by 335
Wang, P. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15864 · Cited by 265
A Resource-Based Theory of Hyperspecialization and Hyperscaling
Giustiziero, G., Kretschmer, T., Somaya, D., & Wu, B. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3365 · Cited by 301
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104906 · Cited by 220
Self-citationA complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology
Phillips, M., & Ritala, P. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119739 · Cited by 209
Palmié, M., Miehé, L., Oghazi, P., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121496 · Cited by 230
User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems
Panico, C., & Cennamo, C. (2020) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3149 · Cited by 188
Self-citationThe Translucent Hand of Managed Ecosystems: Engaging Communities for Value Creation and Capture
Altman, E. J., Nagle, F., & Tushman, M. L. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0244 · Cited by 200
Chen, L., Yi, J., Li, S., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320988337 · Cited by 177
“That sheds light on the key organizational challenge for platform owners to balance variety with ecosystem complexity (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialFocusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies
Baldwin, C. Y., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Kapoor, R., & West, J. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104949 · Cited by 179
Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination
Hong, H., & Shi, Y. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193 · Cited by 186
Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework
Thomas, L. D. W., & Tee, R. (2021) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12277 · Cited by 182
Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2021) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962211023780 · Cited by 176
Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China?s A-share listed companies
Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochоzka, M., & Vozňáková, I. (2022) · Oeconomia Copernicana · doi:10.24136/oc.2022.023 · Cited by 137
Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of TradeLens
Jovanovic, M., Kostić, N., Sebastian, I. M., & Sedej, T. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121981 · Cited by 146
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121648 · Cited by 129
Ritala, P. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12682 · Cited by 110
Sarwar, Z., Gao, J., & Khan, A. U. (2023) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09879-4 · Cited by 107
Platform Signaling for Generating Platform Content
Hukal, P., Henfridsson, O., Shaikh, M., & PARKER, G. G. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/15190 · Cited by 102
Zeng, J., Yang, Y., & Lee, S. H. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12854 · Cited by 114
The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards
Scott, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1056 · Cited by 120
Lei, S., Shi, Q., Parida, V., & Jovanovic, M. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114463 · Cited by 128
Be alert to dangers: Collapse and avoidance strategies of platform ecosystems
Duan, W., & Li, C. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113869 · Cited by 89
Zhao, W. K., Liang, Z., & Li, B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114199 · Cited by 94
Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Papoutsi, C., Shaw, S. E., Fleet, R. P., & Fortin, J. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x · Cited by 104
Murthy, R. K., & Madhok, A. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12748 · Cited by 77
He, J., & Zhang, S. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.004 · Cited by 76
Slicing the cake without baking it: Opportunistic platform entry strategies in digital markets
Karhu, K., & Ritala, P. (2020) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101988 · Cited by 82
Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Chaparro, X. A. F., Facin, A. L. F., & Borini, F. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120950 · Cited by 92
Innovation EcosystemsPreprint
Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3476925 · Cited by 78
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12555 · Cited by 71
Digital innovation: transforming research and practice
Bogers, M. L. A. M., Garud, R. B., Thomas, L. D. W., Tuertscher, P., & Yoo, Y. (2021) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.2005465 · Cited by 83
Platform design and governance in industrial markets: Charting the meta-organizational logic
Springer, V., Randhawa, K., Jovanovic, M., Ritala, P., & Piller, F. T. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105236 · Cited by 61
Leveraging innovation spaces to foster collaborative innovation
Caccamo, M. (2020) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12357 · Cited by 77
Inoue, Y. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120652 · Cited by 65
Managing multi-tiered innovation ecosystems
Reiter, A., Stonig, J., & Frankenberger, K. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104905 · Cited by 69
Engert, M., Evers, J., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10236-3 · Cited by 63
Enhancing social responsibility and resilience through entrepreneurship and digital environment
Awad, J. A. R., & Martín‐Rojas, R. (2023) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2655 · Cited by 63
Extended Generativity Theory on Digital Platforms
Fürstenau, D., Baiyere, A., Schewina, K., Schulte‐Althoff, M., & Rothe, H. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2023.1209 · Cited by 72
Haki, K., Blaschke, M., Aier, S., Winter, R., & Tilson, D. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2136542 · Cited by 67
Thatchenkery, S. M., & Katila, R. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3470 · Cited by 57
Ricart, J. E., Snihur, Y., Carrasco-Farré, C., & Berrone, P. (2020) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2020.0104 · Cited by 66
A bibliometric review of service ecosystems research: current status and future directions
Gölgeci̇, İ., Ali, I., Ritala, P., & Arslan, A. (2021) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-07-2020-0335 · Cited by 61
From product to platform: How incumbents' assumptions and choices shape their platform strategy
Dyck, M. V., Lüttgens, D., Diener, K., Piller, F. T., & Pollok, P. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104904 · Cited by 66
Building digital incentives for digital customer orientation in platform ecosystems
Sun, X., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.068 · Cited by 58
Designing boundary resources in digital government platforms for collaborative service innovation
Gong, Y., & Li, X. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101777 · Cited by 60
Coordination in a Digital Platform Organization
Leong, C., Lin, S., Tan, F. T. C., & Yu, J. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2023.1226 · Cited by 70
Key Challenges and Opportunities for Cloud Technology in Health Care: Semistructured Interview Study
Cresswell, K. M., Hernández, A. D., Williams, R., & Sheikh, A. (2021) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/31246 · Cited by 64
Regulating Professional Players in Peer-to-Peer Markets: Evidence from Airbnb
Chen, W., Wei, Z., & Xie, K. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4480 · Cited by 51
Patterns of business model innovation for advancing IoT platforms
Markfort, L., Arzt, A., Kögler, P., Jung, S., Gebauer, H., Haugk, S., Leyh, C., & Wortmann, F. (2021) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-11-2020-0429 · Cited by 57
Miremadi, I., Khoshbash, M., & Saeedian, M. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104781 · Cited by 55
Mei, J., Zheng, G. W., & Zhu, L. (2021) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12494 · Cited by 56
Agarwal, S., Miller, C. D., & Ganco, M. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3487 · Cited by 49
A framework for mapping actor roles and their innovation potential in digital ecosystems
Brea, E. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102783 · Cited by 54
From platform growth to platform scaling: The role of decision rules and network effects over time
Varga, S., Cholakova, M., Jansen, J. J. P., Mom, T. J. M., & Kok, G. J. M. (2023) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106346 · Cited by 56
The emergence of smart service ecosystems—The role of socio‐technical antecedents and affordances
Herterich, M. M., Dremel, C., Wulf, J., & Brocke, J. V. (2022) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12412 · Cited by 57
Özcan, P., & Hannah, D. P. (2020) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2020.1366 · Cited by 46
The emergence of the ecosystem management function in B2B firms
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Leal, L. F., Zancul, E. D. S., Salerno, M. S., & Borini, F. M. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.12.015 · Cited by 57
Managerial Competencies and Development in the Digital Age
Neumeyer, X., & Liu, M. (2021) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2021.3101950 · Cited by 43
Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies
Shi, X., Liang, X., & Luo, Y. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104783 · Cited by 51
The dApp economy: a new platform for distributed innovation?
Leiponen, A., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wang, Q. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2021.1965887 · Cited by 35
Paradox of Middleware: Innovation Enabler and Creativity Constraint
Miric, M., Ozalp, H., & Yilmaz, E. D. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3457 · Cited by 47
The implications of multi-sided platforms in managing digital business ecosystems
Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Saunila, M., Rantala, T., & Rantanen, H. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114544 · Cited by 48
Peng, H. H., Lu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122338 · Cited by 44
Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions
Silva, L. E. N., Gomes, L. A. D. V., de Faria, A. M., & Borini, F. M. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102984 · Cited by 47
Self-Organization and Governance in Digital Platform Ecosystems: An Information Ecology Approach
Engert, M., Hein, A., Maruping, L. M., Thatcher, J. B., & Krcmar, H. (2024) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/18413 · Cited by 40
Positive, Negative, and Amplified Network Externalities in Platform Markets
Karhu, K., Heiskala, M., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2024) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2023.0119 · Cited by 41
Lekkas, C.-K., & Souitaris, V. (2022) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406221130857 · Cited by 38
Decentralization in Organizations: A Revolution or a Mirage?
Reineke, P., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2025) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2022.0206 · Cited by 43
Smania, G. S., Osiro, L., Ayala, N. F., Coreynen, W., & Mendes, G. H. D. S. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102957 · Cited by 38
Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems
Nerbel, J. F., & Kreutzer, M. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00625-8 · Cited by 37
Comparing Business, Innovation, and Platform Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Liu, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Mutukumira, A. N., Feng, Y., Cui, Y., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2024) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics9040216 · Cited by 51
Ofe, H., & Sandberg, J. (2022) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12404 · Cited by 49
Bustamante, M. J. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122549 · Cited by 35
Somaya, D., & You, J. (2024) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106345 · Cited by 30
Vertical and horizontal complementarities in platform ecosystems
Thomas, L. D. W., Ritala, P., Karhu, K., & Heiskala, M. (2025) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2024.2303593 · Cited by 34
Liu, G., Aroean, L., & Ko, W. W. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108709 · Cited by 37
Mobilising new frontiers in digital transformation research: A problematization review
Ashrafi, A., Constantinides, P., Mehandjiev, N., & Thatcher, J. B. (2025) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12531 · Cited by 33
“Subsequent studies have extended this research trajectory by pointing at two types of generativity, namely, product generativity (Cennamo & Santaló, 2019) and user generativity (Shaikh & Vaast, 2016).”
Peña, M. L. M., Cabanelas, P., & Meyer, N. (2024) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-024-00772-y · Cited by 46
Zhang, J., Yu, B., & Lu, C. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Research Journal · doi:10.1515/erj-2020-0529 · Cited by 40
Ruokolainen, J., Nätti, S., Juutinen, M., Puustinen, J., Holm, A., Vehkaoja, A., & Nieminen, H. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102551 · Cited by 27
Ecosystems and supply chains: How do they differ and relate
Legenvre, H., Hameri, A., & Golini, R. (2022) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100029 · Cited by 40
From open business model to ecosystem business model: A processes view
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Farago, F. E., Facin, A. L. F., Chaparro, X. A. F., & Silva, L. E. N. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122668 · Cited by 40
The platform economy and futures of market societies: Salient tensions in ecosystem evolution
Zander, U., Lu, L., & Chimenti, G. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115037 · Cited by 36
The Race for Online Reputation: Implications for Platforms, Firms and Consumers
Yang, M., Zheng, Z., & Mookerjee, V. S. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1005 · Cited by 35
Costabile, C. (2023) · Data and Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.dim.2023.100053 · Cited by 47
da Rosa, F. S., Compagnucci, L., Lunkes, R. J., & Monteiro, J. J. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3430 · Cited by 33
Chen, X., Yang, Y., & Wei, J. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13063 · Cited by 33
Competition and cooperation in a platform-based business ecosystem within complementary partners
Hong, Z., Zhang, Q., Xu, X., & Lyu, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109337 · Cited by 29
Shifting Dynamics: How Generative AI as a Boundary Resource Reshapes Digital Platform Governance
Mayer, A., Kostis, A., Strich, F., & Holmström, J. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487312 · Cited by 37
The option value in complements within platform‐based ecosystems
Toh, P. K., & Agarwal, S. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3448 · Cited by 28
Complementor Value Co-Creation in Generative AI Platform Ecosystems
Heimburg, V., Schreieck, M., & Wiesche, M. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2487310 · Cited by 33
Mosterd, L., Sobota, V., van de Kaa, G., Ding, A. Y., & de Reuver, M. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102331 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J.
- Affiliations
- Bocconi University (IT)
- Department of Strategy, IE Business School, 28006 Madrid, Spain
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 617-641
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2946420406
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 48.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Keywords
- platform ecosystems, generativity, value creation, free-riding, user satisfaction, collective action theory, complementary innovation, video game industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review