Cited by 123Immune responses and vaccinationsT-cell and B-cell ImmunologySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Heterogeneity and longevity of antibody memory to viruses and vaccines

Open access
Antia, Alice, Ahmed, Hasan, Handel, Andreas, Carlson, Nichole E., Amanna, Ian J., Antia, Rustom, Slifka, Mark·2018·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Determining the duration of protective immunity requires quantifying the magnitude and rate of loss of antibodies to different virus and vaccine antigens. A key complication is heterogeneity in both the magnitude and decay rate of responses of different individuals to a given vaccine, as well as of a given individual to different vaccines. We analyzed longitudinal data on antibody titers in 45 individuals to characterize the extent of this heterogeneity and used models to determine how it affected the longevity of protective immunity to measles, rubella, vaccinia, tetanus, and diphtheria. Our analysis showed that the magnitude of responses in different individuals varied between 12- and 200-fold (95% coverage) depending on the antigen. Heterogeneity in the magnitude and decay rate contribute comparably to variation in the longevity of protective immunity between different individuals. We found that some individuals have, on average, slightly longer-lasting memory than others-on average, they have higher antibody levels with slower decay rates. We identified different patterns for the loss of protective levels of antibodies to different vaccine and virus antigens. Specifically, we found that for the first 25 to 50 years, virtually all individuals have protective antibody titers against diphtheria and tetanus, respectively, but about 10% of the population subsequently lose protective immunity per decade. In contrast, at the outset, not all individuals had protective titers against measles, rubella, and vaccinia. However, these antibody titers wane much more slowly, with a loss of protective immunity in only 1% to 3% of the population per decade. Our results highlight the importance of long-term longitudinal studies for estimating the duration of protective immunity and suggest both how vaccines might be improved and how boosting schedules might be reevaluated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006601

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer-term follow-up will likely show further slowing of neutralizing antibody decay, with titres reaching a stable level similar to other viral pathogens.

    “It is likely that longer-term follow-up studies will reveal a further slowing of decay, with titres reaching a stable level analogous to humoral responses to other viral pathogens22,23.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Panum PL. Lagttagelser, anstillede under maeslinge-epidemien paa Faeroerne i aaret 1846 (Observations made during the epidemic of measles on the Faroe islands in the year 1846). Archiv fur pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und fur klinische Medizin. 1847; 1(Reprinted in Medical Classics vol 3 1939 pp828-886): 492– 512.
  2. [18]KL W, H D. Abschlies-sende untersuchungen uber die Tetanus Prophylaxe durch active Immunisierung. Zeitschrift fur Hyeitschrift. 1942; 124: 326– 32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antia, A., Ahmed, H., Handel, A., Carlson, N. E., Amanna, I. J., Antia, R., & Slifka, M.
Affiliations
  • Carleton College (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Najít Technologies (United States) (US)
  • Oregon National Primate Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Antia, Rustom
  • Slifka, Mark
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
e2006601
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2886131304
Cited by
123
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AI117891, GM111274, P51OD011092)
  • Oregon National Primate Research Center (P51OD011092)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM111274)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI132186, U19AI109948, R01AI110720, U19AI117891)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
antibody titers, antibody waning, individual heterogeneity, measles vaccine, rubella vaccine, smallpox vaccine, tetanus vaccine, diphtheria vaccine, vaccine immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Antibodies, Viral, Child, Child, Preschool, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Immunologic Memory, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Viruses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review