The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
A systematic review to examine the efficacy of computer-based cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults was conducted. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: average sample age of at least 55 years at time of training; participants did not have Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment; and the study measured cognitive outcomes as a result of training. Theoretical articles, review articles, and book chapters that did not include original data were excluded. We identified 151 studies published between 1984 and 2011, of which 38 met inclusion criteria and were further classified into three groups by the type of computerized program used: classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games. Reported pre-post training effect sizes for intervention groups ranged from 0.06 to 6.32 for classic cognitive training interventions, 0.19 to 7.14 for neuropsychological software interventions, and 0.09 to 1.70 for video game interventions. Most studies reported older adults did not need to be technologically savvy in order to successfully complete or benefit from training. Overall, findings are comparable or better than those from reviews of more traditional, paper-and-pencil cognitive training approaches suggesting that computerized training is an effective, less labor intensive alternative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Action video game modifies visual selective attention
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01647 · Cited by 2,540
Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Smith, D. M., Tennstedt, S. L., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 · Cited by 2,049
Self-citationMetabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer's disease
Minoshima, S., Giordani, B., Berent, S., Frey, K. A., Foster, N. L., & Kuhl, D. E. (1997) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410420114 · Cited by 1,802
Long-term Effects of Cognitive Training on Everyday Functional Outcomes in Older Adults
Willis, S. L., Tennstedt, S. L., Marsiske, M., Ball, K., Elias, J., Koepke, K. M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Unverzagt, F. W., Stoddard, A. M., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.23.2805 · Cited by 1,496
Self-citationCan training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults?
Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0013494 · Cited by 855
Mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: Predictors of dementia
Flicker, C., Ferris, S. H., & Reisberg, B. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.7.1006 · Cited by 838
Smith, G. E., Housen, P., Yaffe, K., Ruff, R., Kennison, R. F., Mahncke, H. W., & Zelinski, E. M. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02167.x · Cited by 785
Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study.
Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1992) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.242 · Cited by 601
Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use
Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860601086546 · Cited by 501 · cited 1×
“Common reasons for exclusion included pre-existing memory impairments in the sample (e.g., [19,20]), average age less than 55 years (e.g., [15]), and not measuring cognitive function (e.g., [21– 23]).”
Background
Cited by
Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 · Cited by 1,177
Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review
Rezende, L. F. M. D., Rey-López, J. P., Matsudo, V. K. R., & Luiz, O. D. C. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-333 · Cited by 685
Kelly, M. E., Loughrey, D., Lawlor, B. A., Robertson, I. H., Walsh, C., & Brennan, S. (2014) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.004 · Cited by 509
Coyle, H., Traynor, V., & Solowij, N. (2015) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009 · Cited by 274
Kimhy, D., Vakhrusheva, J., Bartels, M. N., Armstrong, H. F., Ballon, J. S., Khan, S., Chang, R. W., Hansen, M. C., Ayanruoh, L., Lister, A., et al. (2015) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv022 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Kueider, A. M., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Rebok, G. W.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-07-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e40588
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161493715
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588
- The paper
- Kueider, A. M., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Rebok, G. W. (2012). Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
