Cited by 126Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Marine N-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Are Inversely Associated with Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Asians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Zheng, Ju-Sheng, Huang, Tao, Yang, Jing, Fu, Yuan-Qing, Li, Duo·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies in relation to the associations between n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) were inconsistent. Differences in tissue n-3 PUFA compositions in subjects with and without T2D were also inconsistent in both cohort and case-control studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to examine the associations of fish and n-3 PUFA intake with T2D risk. The differences in tissue n-3 PUFA compositions in subjects with and without T2D were investigated based on cohort and case-control studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese VIP database up to January 2012 was used to identify relevant studies, and reference lists from retrieved studies were reviewed. Two authors independently extracted the data. Random-effects models were used to pool the summary relative risk (RR). Twenty-four studies including 24,509 T2D patients and 545,275 participants were identified. For cohort studies, the summary RR of T2D for the highest vs lowest categories of total fish, marine n-3 PUFA and alpha-linolenic acid intake was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.25), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.20) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.07), respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated that summary RR (highest vs lowest category) of T2D for fish and marine n-3 PUFA intake was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.96) for Asian populations, and 1.20 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.44) and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.28) for Western populations. Asian subjects with T2D had significantly lower tissue compositions of C22:6n-3 (SMD: -1.43; 95% CI: -1.75, -1.12) and total n-3 PUFA (SMD: -1.41; 95% CI: -2.23, -0.59) compared with those without T2D. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that marine n-3 PUFA have beneficial effects on the prevention of T2D in Asian populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0044525

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fish and omega-3 intake have little association with diabetes risk, although protective associations are seen in Asian populations and fish oil supplementation modestly raises adiponectin.

    “Fish and omega-3 intake also have little association with diabetes risk, although protective associations are seen in Asian populations209-211 and fish oil supplementation modestly raises adiponectin.212”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Zhang B, Wang ZZ, Song HP (2011) The change of plasma long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in type 2 diabetes (in Chinese). Journal of China Traditional Chinese Medicine Information 3: 353– 354.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, J.-S., Huang, T., Yang, J., Fu, Y.-Q., & Li, D.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Duo
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-09-11
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e44525
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074950966
Cited by
126
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (973 Program, 2011CB504002, 30972464)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (30972464, 2011CB504002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, omega-3 fatty acids, marine fatty acids, fish consumption, alpha-linolenic acid, dietary intake, tissue fatty acid composition, Asian populations, Western populations, docosahexaenoic acid, EPA, diabetes risk, prospective cohort, subgroup analysis by ethnicity, omega-3 supplementation, diabetes remission, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Fish Oils, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Cohort Studies, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Case-Control Studies, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review