Cited by 2,896Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex

Open access
Bienenstock, EL, Cooper, LN, Munro, PW·1982·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The development of stimulus selectivity in the primary sensory cortex of higher vertebrates is considered in a general mathematical framework. A synaptic evolution scheme of a new kind is proposed in which incoming patterns rather than converging afferents compete. The change in the efficacy of a given synapse depends not only on instantaneous pre- and postsynaptic activities but also on a slowly varying time-averaged value of the postsynaptic activity. Assuming an appropriate nonlinear form for this dependence, development of selectivity is obtained under quite general conditions on the sensory environment. One does not require nonlinearity of the neuron's integrative power nor does one need to assume any particular form for intracortical circuitry. This is first illustrated in simple cases, e.g., when the environment consists of only two different stimuli presented alternately in a random manner. The following formal statement then holds: the state of the system converges with probability 1 to points of maximum selectivity in the state space. We next consider the problem of early development of orientation selectivity and binocular interaction in primary visual cortex. Giving the environment an appropriate form, we obtain orientation tuning curves and ocular dominance comparable to what is observed in normally reared adult cats or monkeys. Simulations with binocular input and various types of normal or altered environments show good agreement with the relevant experimental data. Experiments are suggested that could test our theory further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.02-01-00032.1982

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anderson, J. A. (1970) Two models for memory organization Hebb, D. 0. (1949) Organization of Behavior, John Wiley and using interacting traces. Math. Biosci. 8: 137-160.
  2. selectivity. Doctoral thesis, Brown University, Providence, Hirsch, H. V. B., and D. N. Spinelli (1971) Modification of the RI. distribution of receptive field orientation in cats by selective
  3. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel (1962) Receptive fields, binoc- Vol. 2, No. 1, Jan. 1982 ular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160: 106-154.
  4. LeventhaI, A. G., and H. V. B. Hirsch (1977) Effects of early experience upon orientation selectivity and binocularity of neurons in visual cortex of cats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74: 1272-1276.
  5. Pettigrew, J. D. (1978) The paradox of the critical period for striate cortex. In Neuronal Plasticity, C. W. Cotman, ed., pp. 311-330, Raven Press, New York.
  6. Singer, W. (1979) Central-core control of visual functions. In Neuroscience Fourth Study Program, F. Schmitt and F. Worden, eds., pp. 1093-1109, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  7. Trotter, Y., Y. Fregnac, P. Buisseret (1981) Gating control of developmental plasticity by extraocular proprioception in kitten area 17. In Fourth European Conference on Visual Perception, Gouzieux, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,006

Metadata

Authors
Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., & Munro, P.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1982-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
32-48
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1733248925
Cited by
2,896
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 119 · 2012: 112
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ittleson Foundation
  • Brown University
  • Fondation de France
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
orientation selectivity, binocular interaction, primary visual cortex, ocular dominance, synaptic plasticity, orientation tuning curves, synaptic efficacy, cortical development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Dominance, Cerebral, Mathematics, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Orientation, Retina, Sensory Deprivation, Synapses, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review