Cited by 611Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

The Dynamics of Dendritic Structure in Developing Hippocampal Slices

Open access
Dailey, Michael E., Smith, Stephen J·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Time-lapse fluorescence confocal microscopy was used to directly visualize the formation and dynamics of postsynaptic target structures (i.e., dendritic branches and spines) on pyramidal neurons within developing tissue slices. Within a 2 week period of time, pyramidal neurons in cultured slices derived from early postnatal rat (postnatal days 2-7) developed complex dendritic arbors bearing numerous postsynaptic spines. At early stages (1-2 d in vitro), many fine filopodial protrusions on dendrite shafts rapidly extended (maximum rate approximately 2.5 microM/minute) and retracted (median filopodial lifetime, 10 min), but some filopodia transformed into growth cones and nascent dendrite branches. As dendritic arbors matured, the population of fleeting lateral filopodia was replaced by spine-like structures having a low rate of turnover. This developmental progression involved a transitional stage in which dendrites were dominated by persistent (up to 22 hr) but dynamic spiny protrusions (i.e., protospines) that showed substantial changes in length and shape on a timescale of minutes. These observations reveal a highly dynamic state of postsynaptic target structures that may actively contribute to the formation and plasticity of synaptic connections during CNS development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-09-02983.1996

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dailey, M. E., & Smith, S. J.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-05-01
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
2983-2994
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2130183688
Cited by
611
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 25
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01ns028587-08, 5p50mh048108-07, 1f32ns009027-01, MH48108)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 48108)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS28587, NS09027)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
dendritic development, dendritic spines, filopodia, growth cones, pyramidal neurons, hippocampal slices, dendritic branching, synaptic plasticity, postnatal rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Confocal, Culture Techniques, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review