Cited by 323Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Non-Fc-Mediated Mechanisms Are Involved in Clearance of Amyloid-β In Vivo by Immunotherapy

Open access
Bacskai, Brian J., Kajdasz, Stephen T., McLellan, Megan E., Games, Dora, Seubert, Peter, Schenk, Dale, Hyman, Bradley T.·2002·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Transgenic (Tg) mouse models overexpressing amyloid precursor protein (APP) develop senile plaques similar to those found in Alzheimer's disease in an age-dependent manner. Recent reports demonstrated that immunotherapy is effective at preventing or removing amyloid-beta deposits in the mouse models. To characterize the mechanisms involved in clearance, we used antibodies of either IgG1 (10d5) or IgG2b (3d6) applied directly to the brains of 18-month-old Tg2576 or 20-month-old PDAPP mice. Both 10d5 and 3d6 led to clearance of 50% of diffuse amyloid deposits in both animal models within 3 d. Fc receptor-mediated clearance has been shown to be important in an ex vivo assay showing antibody-mediated clearance of plaques by microglia. We now show, using in vivo multiphoton microscopy, that FITC-labeled F(ab')2 fragments of 3d6 (which lack the Fc region of the antibody) also led to clearance of 45% of the deposits within 3 d, similar to the results obtained with full-length 3d6 antibody. This result suggests that direct disruption of plaques, in addition to Fc-dependent phagocytosis, is involved in the antibody-mediated clearance of amyloid-beta deposits in vivo. Dense-core deposits that were not cleared were reduced in size by approximately 30% with full-length antibodies and F(ab')2 fragments 3 d after a topical treatment. Together, these results indicate that clearance of amyloid deposits in vivo may involve, in addition to Fc-dependent clearance, a non-Fc-mediated disruption of plaque structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.22-18-07873.2002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous in vivo results range from showing that microglia are effective at phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid to suggesting that microglia play no role in the control of amyloid deposition.

    “Previous in vivo results range from showing that microglia are effective at phagocytosis of fibrillar amyloid (Frautschy et al., 1991; Bacskai et al., 2002; Bolmont et al., 2008) to suggesting that microglia play no role in the control of amyloid deposition (Grathwohl et al., 2009).”

    From CX3CR1 in Microglia Regulates Brain Amyloid Deposition through Selective Protofibrillar Amyloid-β Phagocytosis (2010) · cites this paper as Bacskai et al., 2002

    The Results report in vivo clearance of dense-core amyloid plaques after antibody treatment, and the Discussion treats microglial phagocytosis as a possible clearance mechanism. But the paper attributes direct evidence of microglial phagocytosis to ex vivo work; its own in vivo experiments also found effective Fc-independent clearance. It therefore does not show that microglia phagocytosed fibrillar amyloid in vivo. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Microglia may only be able to remove fibrillar amyloid from plaques during heightened levels of activation such as in injury models or after Aβ immunization.

    “Thus microglia may only be able to remove fibrillar amyloid from plaques during heightened levels of activation such as in injury models (DiCarlo et al., 2001) or after Aβ immunization (Bacskai et al., 2002).”

    From CX3CR1 in Microglia Regulates Brain Amyloid Deposition through Selective Protofibrillar Amyloid-β Phagocytosis (2010) · cites this paper as Bacskai et al., 2002

    The introduction links microglial activation after topical antibody treatment to a possible Fc-mediated clearance mechanism, and the Results report clearance of some dense-core plaques after antibody treatment. But the paper does not establish that microglia themselves cleared those plaques or that heightened activation is required; it also finds evidence for non-Fc-mediated clearance. Its experiments used topical antibodies, not Aβ immunization. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treatment with anti-Aβ antibodies in APP transgenic mice can remove plaques.

    “treatment with anti-A␤ antibodies in APP transgenic mice can remove plaques (Bacskai et al., 2002)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Janus C, Pearson J, McLaurin J, Mathews PM, Jiang Y, Schmidt SD, Chishti MA, Horne P, Heslin D, French J, Mount HT, Nixon RA, Mercken M, Bergeron C, Fraser PE, St George-Hyslop P, Westaway D (2000) A beta peptide immunization reduces behavioural impairment and plaques in a model of Alzheimer's disease. Nature 408:979 -982.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacskai, B. J., Kajdasz, S. T., McLellan, M. E., Games, D., Seubert, P., Schenk, D., & Hyman, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Ireland) (IE)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2002-09-15
Volume
22
Issue
18
Pages
7873-7878
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1528113046
Cited by
323
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 22
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fidelity Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08487, P01AG15453, R01AG008487, P01AG015453)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM07753, T32GM007753)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyloid-beta clearance, antibody immunotherapy, F(ab')2 fragments, Fc receptors, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, Tg2576 mice, PDAPP mice, plaque disruption, microglial phagocytosis
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antibodies, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Immunotherapy, Mice, Transgenic, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Mutation, Phagocytosis, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice, Benzothiazoles, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review