Cited by 84Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Phasic activation of locus ceruleus neurons by the central nucleus of the amygdala

Open access
Bouret, Sebastien, Duvel, Adam, Onat, Selim, Sara, Susan J.·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The role of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeN) in modulating output of noradrenaline in the forebrain was evaluated by recording extracellular, single-unit activity from the noradrenergic nucleus locus ceruleus (LC) during stimulation of the CeN. Short high-frequency trains (200 Hz) delivered at 800 microA in the CeN evoked phasic responses in 90% of the neurons recorded in LC. Single pulses were also effective but less reliably. The responses were complex, multiphasic with an initial latency of 10-20 msec. This early peak was diminished or, in some cases, completely blocked by local or intracerebroventricular application of the corticotrophin releasing factor antagonist alpha helical CRF (9-41). The later excitatory peak and subsequent inhibition were not effected by the drug treatment. The results underline the reciprocal functional relationship between the amygdaloid complex and the LC and suggest that the LC might be an important "effector" of CeN activation during learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03491.2003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouret, S., Duvel, A., Onat, S., & Sara, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-04-15
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
3491-3497
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1502932036
Cited by
84
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
locus coeruleus, central amygdala, norepinephrine, corticotropin-releasing factor, alpha-helical CRF(9-41), noradrenergic neurons, single-unit activity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amygdala, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Drug Administration Routes, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Evoked Potentials, Hormone Antagonists, Injections, Intraventricular, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Reaction Time, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review