Cited by 73Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein 1 Feedback Loop Is Necessary for Consolidation of Long-Term Synaptic Facilitation in Aplysia

Open access
Liu, Rong-Yu, Fioravante, Diasinou, Shah, Shreyansh, Byrne, John H.·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The transcription factor cAMP response element (CRE)-binding protein (CREB) plays an essential role in the induction of many forms of long-term synaptic plasticity. Levels of CREB1, the Aplysia homolog of CREB, show sustained elevations for several hours after the induction of long-term synaptic facilitation (LTF). Furthermore, CREB1 binds to the promoter of its own gene. These results suggest the existence of a CREB1-positive feedback loop that contributes to the consolidation of LTF. In the present study, we provide a detailed, quantitative characterization of the dynamics of CREB1 mRNA and protein as well as CREB1 phosphorylation after LTF induction. Injections of CRE oligonucleotides prevented the increase in CREB1 in response to 5-HT, corroborating the existence of the CREB1 feedback loop. This loop probably sustains CRE-dependent gene transcription, which remains elevated for at least 12 h after LTF induction. LTF is blocked by injection of CREB1 antibody after the induction phase, suggesting that the CREB1-positive feedback is required for consolidation of LTF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3848-07.2008

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spaced training may be more effective, in part, because it may allow sufficient time for transcription factors such as CREB to be activated, bind to promoters and induce a round of transcription for consolidation of LTP or long-term facilitation.

    “Spaced training may be more effective, in part, because it may allow sufficient time for transcription factors such as CREB to be activated, bind to promoters and induce a round of transcription for the consolidation of LTP53 or for long-term facilitation (LTF) of synapses54.”
  • In Aplysia californica sensory neurons, levels of the transcription activator CREB1 are elevated for at least 24 hours after spaced 5-HT treatments.

    “In these sensory neurons, levels of the transcription activator CREB1 are elevated for at least 24 hours after the spaced 5-HT treatments54,55.”
  • The prolonged elevation of CREB1 levels is due to a positive feedback loop in which CREB1 binds to a CRE regulatory element near creb1 and increases expression of creb1 and other genes upregulated by CREB1.

    “This prolonged elevation of CREB1 levels is due to a positive feedback loop in which this protein, by binding to a CRE regulatory element near creb1, increases the expression of creb1 (REFS 54,55) and other genes that are upregulated by CREB1.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, R.-Y., Fioravante, D., Shah, S., & Byrne, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1970-1976
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2005304682
Cited by
73
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS019895)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS019895, R01NS019895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
CREB1, CREB, positive feedback loop, Aplysia, serotonin
MeSH terms
Animals, Aplysia, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Afferent, Synapses, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Long-Term Potentiation, Coculture Techniques, Feedback, Physiological, Structural Homology, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review