Cited by 29Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Deficit in Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity Is Rescued by a Computationally Predicted Stimulus Protocol

Open access
Liu, Rong-Yu, Zhang, Yili, Baxter, Douglas A., Smolen, Paul, Cleary, Leonard J., Byrne, John H.·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Mutations in the gene encoding CREB-binding protein (CBP) cause deficits in long-term plasticity, learning, and memory. Here, long-term synaptic facilitation (LTF) at Aplysia sensorimotor synapses in cell culture was used as a model system to investigate methods for overcoming deficits in LTF produced by a CBP knockdown. Injecting CBP–siRNA into individual sensory neurons reduced CBP levels and impaired LTF produced by a standard protocol of five 5-min pulses of serotonin (5-HT) delivered at 20 min interstimulus intervals. A computational model, which simulated molecular processes underlying LTF induction, predicted a rescue protocol of five pulses of 5-HT at non-uniform interstimulus intervals that overcame the consequences of reduced CBP and restored LTF. These results suggest that complementary empirical and computational studies can identify methods for ameliorating impairments of learning attributable to molecular lesions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0643-13.2013

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models have simulated the activity time courses of PKA, CaMKII, other key enzymes and downstream transcription factors during LTP induction.

    “Models have also simulated the activity time courses of PKA, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), other key enzymes and downstream transcription factors during LTP induction88–90.”
  • The recent study used siRNA knockdown of CBP in A. californica sensory neurons to impair LTF.

    “The recent study90 used small-interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of CBP in A. californica sensory neurons to impair LTF.”
  • This rescue protocol was empirically validated to restore normal LTF in A. californica.

    “This rescue protocol was empirically validated to restore normal LTF in A. californica.”
  • A 'rescue' protocol with irregularly spaced intervals was predicted to restore peak pC/EBP levels and, correspondingly, LTF.

    “A ‘rescue’ protocol with irregularly spaced intervals was predicted to restore peak pC/EBP levels and, correspondingly, LTF.”
  • Simulations showed a substantial decrease in pC/EBP levels when the level of CBP was reduced by a decrement that corresponded to the siRNA effect.

    “Simulations showed a substantial decrease in pC/EBP levels when the level of CBP was reduced by a decrement that corresponded to the siRNA effect.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, R.-Y., Zhang, Y., Baxter, D. A., Smolen, P., Cleary, L. J., & Byrne, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-04-17
Volume
33
Issue
16
Pages
6944-6949
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1977776764
Cited by
29
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS073974, NS019895, R01NS019895, R01NS073974, R37NS019895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
CREB-binding protein, long-term synaptic plasticity, long-term facilitation, serotonin, interstimulus interval, siRNA knockdown, learning and memory impairment, molecular lesions
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Aplysia, Biophysics, Cells, Cultured, Computer Simulation, Electric Stimulation, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Neuronal Plasticity, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensory Receptor Cells, Serotonin, Synapses, Coculture Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, RNA, Small Interfering, CREB-Binding Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review