Cited by 60Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

The Requirement for Enhanced CREB1 Expression in Consolidation of Long-Term Synaptic Facilitation and Long-Term Excitability in Sensory Neurons of Aplysia

Open access
Liu, Rong-Yu, Cleary, Leonard J., Byrne, John H.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that the transcriptional activator cAMP response element-binding protein 1 (CREB1) is important for serotonin (5-HT)-induced long-term facilitation (LTF) of the sensorimotor synapse in Aplysia. Moreover,creb1 is among the genes activated by CREB1, suggesting a role for this protein beyond the induction phase of LTF. The time course of the requirement for CREB1 synthesis in the consolidation of long-term facilitation was examined using RNA interference techniques in sensorimotor cocultures. Injection of CREB1 small-interfering RNA (siRNA) immediately or 10 h after 5-HT treatment blocked LTF when measured at 24 and 48 h after treatment. In contrast, CREB1 siRNA did not block LTF when injected 16 h after 5-HT treatment. These results demonstrate that creb1 expression must be sustained for a relatively long time to support the consolidation of LTF. In addition, LTF is also accompanied by a long-term increase in the excitability (LTE) of sensory neurons (SNs). Because LTE was observed in the isolated SN after 5-HT treatment, this long-term change was intrinsic to that element of the circuit. LTE was blocked when CREB1 siRNA was injected into isolated SNs immediately after 5-HT treatment. These data suggest that 5-HT-induced CREB1 synthesis is required for consolidation of both LTF and LTE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5071-10.2011

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prolonged elevation of CREB1 levels is due to a positive feedback loop in which CREB1 binds to a CRE regulatory element near creb1 and increases expression of creb1 and other genes upregulated by CREB1.

    “This prolonged elevation of CREB1 levels is due to a positive feedback loop in which this protein, by binding to a CRE regulatory element near creb1, increases the expression of creb1 (REFS 54,55) and other genes that are upregulated by CREB1.”
  • In Aplysia californica sensory neurons, levels of the transcription activator CREB1 are elevated for at least 24 hours after spaced 5-HT treatments.

    “In these sensory neurons, levels of the transcription activator CREB1 are elevated for at least 24 hours after the spaced 5-HT treatments54,55.”
  • Slow dynamics of additional biochemical cascades contribute to LTM, such as changes in the synthesis of transcription factors CREB1 and CREB2.

    “For example, the slow dynamics of additional biochemical cascades contribute to LTM (e.g., changes in the synthesis of transcription factors such as CREB1 and CREB22,32).”

    From Computational design of enhanced learning protocols (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Increased levels of CREB1 phosphorylation are associated with the induction and consolidation of LTF at sensorimotor synapses.

    “For example, increased levels of CREB1 phosphorylation are associated with the induction and consolidation of LTF at sensorimotor synapses2,25,28.”

    From Computational design of enhanced learning protocols (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, R.-Y., Cleary, L. J., & Byrne, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
31
Issue
18
Pages
6871-6879
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2081408258
Cited by
60
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS019895, R01NS019895, R37NS019895)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
CREB1, long-term facilitation, sensory neurons, Aplysia, serotonin, transcriptional regulation, siRNA knockdown, neuronal excitability
MeSH terms
Animals, Aplysia, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Sensory Receptor Cells, Synapses, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Long-Term Potentiation, Coculture Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review