Cited by 107Mind wandering and attentionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Dynamical Properties of BOLD Activity from the Ventral Posteromedial Cortex Associated with Meditation and Attentional Skills

Open access
Pagnoni, Giuseppe·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroimaging data suggest a link between the spontaneous production of thoughts during wakeful rest and slow fluctuations of activity in the default mode network (DMN), a set of brain regions with high basal metabolism and a major neural hub in the ventral posteromedial cortex (vPMC). Meta-awareness and regulation of mind-wandering are core cognitive components of most contemplative practices and to study their impact on DMN activity, we collected functional MRI (fMRI) data from a cohort of experienced Zen meditators and meditation-naive controls engaging in a basic attention-to-breathing protocol. We observed a significant group difference in the skewness of the fMRI BOLD signal from the vPMC, suggesting that the relative incidence of states of elevated vPMC activity was lower in meditators; furthermore, the same parameter was significantly correlated with performance on a rapid visual information processing (RVIP) test for sustained attention conducted outside the scanner. Finally, a functional connectivity analysis with the vPMC seed revealed a significant association of RVIP performance with the degree of temporal correlation between vPMC and the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a region strongly implicated in stimulus-triggered reorienting of attention. Together, these findings suggest that the vPMC BOLD signal skewness and the temporal relationship of vPMC and TPJ activities reflect the dynamic tension between mind-wandering, meta-awareness, and directed attention, and may represent a useful endophenotype for studying individual differences in attentional abilities and the impairment of the latter in specific clinical conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4135-11.2012

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term meditators display reduced default mode network activity even during resting states, suggesting a lasting effect of meditation on self-referential thought and DMN connectivity.

    “Moreover, long-term meditators display reduced DMN activity even during resting states, suggesting a lasting effect of meditation on self-referential thought and DMN connectivity [51].”

    From Mindfulness meditation and psychedelics: potential synergies and commonalities (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report that experienced Zen meditators had a lower relative incidence of elevated activity in one DMN region, the vPMC, during an attention-to-breathing task—not during unconstrained rest. The Results section on vPMC-seeded functional connectivity found no significant group differences, so the paper does not establish a lasting change in DMN connectivity. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pagnoni, G.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Pagnoni, Giuseppe
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-04-11
Volume
32
Issue
15
Pages
5242-5249
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2022682914
Cited by
107
References
72
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P30AT000609)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
default mode network, Zen meditation, mind wandering, meta-awareness, sustained attention, temporoparietal junction, functional connectivity, attentional reorienting, endophenotypes, rapid visual information processing, meditation experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Respiration, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review