Cited by 584Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings

Maguire, Eleanor·2001·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The clinical and neuroimaging literatures are surveyed in order to collate for the first time the available data on retrosplenial involvement in human navigation. Several notable features emerge from consideration of the case reports of relatively pure topographical disorientation in the presence of a retrosplenial lesion. The majority of cases follow damage to the right retrosplenial cortex, with Brodmann's area 30 apparently compromised in most cases. All patients displayed impaired learning of new routes, and defective navigation in familiar environments complaining they could not use preserved landmark recognition to aid orientation. The deficit generally resolved within eight weeks of onset. The majority of functional neuroimaging studies involving navigation or orientation in large-scale space also activate the retrosplenial cortex, usually bilaterally, with good concordance in the locations of the voxel of peak activation across studies, again with Brodmann's area 30 featuring prominently. While there is strong evidence for right medial temporal lobe involvement in navigation, it now seems that the inputs the hippocampus and related structures receive from and convey to right retrosplenial cortex have a similar spatial preference, while the left medial temporal and left retrosplenial cortices seem primarily concerned with more general aspects of episodic memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9450.00233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unilateral retrosplenial damage can cause topographic disorientation.

    “Meanwhile, unilateral retrosplenial damage, which presumably involves the cingulum, can cause topographic disorientation (Maguire, 2001; Takahashi et al., 1997)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Maguire, 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maguire, E.
Affiliations
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Maguire, Eleanor
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
225-238
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2084404187
Cited by
584
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 21
FWCI
46.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
retrosplenial cortex, human navigation, spatial orientation, topographical disorientation, route learning, landmark detection, hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, episodic memory, hemispheric lateralization, lesion studies, functional neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Animals, Gyrus Cinguli, Homing Behavior, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Orientation, Space Perception, Tomography, Emission-Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review